rachel wrote:Don't be bitter! Guys. Guys! Hermaj and I are waiting on these pictures of boys in dresses.
Well I'm waiting for world peace*, but we can't all be so selfish
*and a gf**
**post not come yet
Moderators: Moderators General, Magistrates, Prelates
rachel wrote:Don't be bitter! Guys. Guys! Hermaj and I are waiting on these pictures of boys in dresses.
myoumyouou wrote:weird how?
there's nothing weird about crossdressing.
nothing at all. unless you're one of those homophobic people
TheTankengine wrote:myoumyouou wrote:weird how?
there's nothing weird about crossdressing.
nothing at all. unless you're one of those homophobic people
Unless all crossdressers are homosexuals (I was under the impression that was not so) then homophobia has nothing to do with it.
no-genius wrote:TheTankengine wrote:myoumyouou wrote:weird how?
there's nothing weird about crossdressing.
nothing at all. unless you're one of those homophobic people
Unless all crossdressers are homosexuals (I was under the impression that was not so) then homophobia has nothing to do with it.
No, i think homosexuals who cross-dress are a subset of cross-dressers and homosexuals. Also I like Eddie Izzard, but he does look weird in a dress. Yeah, that probably is homophobia.
TheTankengine wrote:Your pictures have showed me why my so called phobia of seeing exactly what you posted are not irrational. I think it is actually quite justified.
lani wrote:My favoritest picture ever.
(I'm sorry, I don't know how to thumbnail)
lani wrote:I am a sad panda because this is about the only thread I can contribute much to. My math and physics skills are no longer ninja-like and sharp, and I didn't go past calc II. That was also ...a long time ago that I took that class.
There should be more non-nerd threads for other peeps like me.
...not that I actually have time to read/post in them...
Gelsamel wrote:The brutal and disgusting homosexuality is dwarfed by the beauty if your face.
If your face wasn't there I'd be scarred for life
Jesster wrote:Need not feel left out. I am the rough outcast of these forums by being a writer over science/math-related worker, my knowledge of such things is limited to reading these forums and my subscription to NewScientist.
Casey wrote:lani wrote:(I'm sorry, I don't know how to thumbnail)
Well, unlike my 900-pixel monstrosities, your photo is already a tidy and compact size, unlikely to break anyone's view of the discussion.
-c.
hermaj wrote:This is because you would be a giggle-ee and not a giggle-er.Maybe it is kind of like when a girl is walking down the street with killer heels and a slinky dress or something, and a group of boys all whistle and shout out at her? It is not really fun for the lady, but the boys look like they are having fun.
lani wrote:And I've heard only one song by the Dandy Warhols...is Come Down a song/music video or something?
lani wrote:And by now, do you mean then? 'Cause I'm online now, but I wasn't then. Then again, who's to know if now will be then when then becomes now for you?
That may have no made any sense...shut up, I'm tired
Interesting bit of trivia: I once read an article that said that men who had a bit of a feminine look are actually considered more attractive than the straight up rugged look. I guess the world's fascination with Orlando Bloom is support for that.
Saladin wrote:Interesting bit of trivia: I once read an article that said that men who had a bit of a feminine look are actually considered more attractive than the straight up rugged look. I guess the world's fascination with Orlando Bloom is support for that.
Even interestinger (what?), I saw on the natgeo channel or something how women like the rugged or more feminine look depending on what time of the month it is.
Users browsing this forum: abranosib, Bkppiw39, Fekeenuisance, Fiejoibre, FiemiBrarkemi, geueraptewaymnat, geuUrbataabith, geuwerAnorkgog, mqmsju22, rogerUrbataabith, Slageammalymn, SlefBalia, spanceapoke, ThirdParty, WeMbrerveguet, Yoshisummons and 11 guests