Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates
mrbaggins wrote:There are two tools in life, duct tape and WD40. If it moves and shouldn't, use the tape. If it doesn't move and should, use the WD40.
Bobber wrote:My favorites are the ones where you can easily discern between the e and t - it shows something about the etymology instead of just being some arbitrary wiggly shape.
Felstaff wrote:Serves you goddamned right. I hope you're happy, Cake Ruiner
thinglie wrote:What's that one on the far right? Looks swirly and nice.
I'm inclined to agree, but in an odd contradiction, I don't like it when people write "&c." instead of "etc." Not sure why...Bobber wrote:My favorites are the ones where you can easily discern between the e and t - it shows something about the etymology instead of just being some arbitrary wiggly shape.
roc314 wrote:America is a police state that communicates in txt speak...
"i hav teh dissentors brb""¡This cheese is burning me! u pwnd them bff""thx ur cool 2"

Kizyr wrote:I'm not sure how or why, but I got into the habit of writing mine like a 3 with a vertical line
gmalivuk wrote:Kizyr wrote:I'm not sure how or why, but I got into the habit of writing mine like a 3 with a vertical line
It would make more sense to be the mirror image of that, which is probably the version on which you originally based your own ampersand. (Because reversing the 3 makes it look like an E. But probably you hadn't seen E written that way when you first saw an ampersand written that way, so you mentally categorized it as being 3-like.)

Kizyr wrote:Huh... surprised that came back to me so quickly. KF
gmalivuk wrote:Kizyr wrote:Huh... surprised that came back to me so quickly. KF
Well, to be fair, human beings are very good at making up things and giving them the patina of real memories. Especially if it's a logical-sounding explanation for something.

Velifer wrote:What are the chances that the ampersand is actually E/ ? Is there any real way to know?
mrbaggins wrote:There are two tools in life, duct tape and WD40. If it moves and shouldn't, use the tape. If it doesn't move and should, use the WD40.
Bobber wrote:I have been looking for handwritten Latin texts here, but have yet to find anything that I can identify as & or e/.
Velifer wrote:I might have to bite the • and say I was wrong. While I'd like to join the ♣, I don't see too many people using the @ symbol the same way we use &, so my initial thought fell a bit ♭. We use % and currency symbols more widely, perhaps we should make them an ∫ part of the alphabet first.
Somebody's gonna put a † in my eye for this post.
Ceci n'est pas une |.
(But that's what I learned it was called! Vertical bar? How dull.)
∫=integral. Shame on you for posting in the linguistics board without proper knowledge of calculus.thinglie wrote:an new part
smw543 wrote:∫=integral. Shame on you for posting in the linguistics board without proper knowledge of calculus.thinglie wrote:an new part
thinglie wrote:Somebody's gonna put a dart in my eye for this post.
This is why.smw543 wrote:Also, isn't "pipe" the French word for "pipe" (pronounced differently)? Why is that last part in French?
thinglie wrote:For those without Unicode
gmalivuk wrote:thinglie wrote:For those without Unicode
Pretty sure all of that was basic ASCII...
mrbaggins wrote:There are two tools in life, duct tape and WD40. If it moves and shouldn't, use the tape. If it doesn't move and should, use the WD40.
But yours only has twenty-seven letters...thinglie wrote:ABCDEFGHIJLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ&@.
Perhaps we do have a 28-letter alphabet after all...
"Et" means "and" in Latin. It happened to survive unchanged until today in French.fimzo wrote:Did "&/et" come to represent "and" due to the usage of another language, French for example? I guess I could just look it up, but I thought I'd mention it here. Also, "ampersand" is a neat name, but who came up with it?
&&&Et&
Beware of the shrolymerase!Hammer wrote:We are only mildly modly.
Bobber wrote:My favorites are the ones where you can easily discern between the e and t - it shows something about the etymology instead of just being some arbitrary wiggly shape.

Joeldi wrote:None of my teachers permitted ampersands in typed or written work, at least in early grades. I never found out if teacher's in year 11 and 12 would've have minded, because I never got in to the habit. Though I've never really used them (outside of programming), I still appreciate them. &&&&&
fimzo wrote:Did "&/et" come to represent "and" due to the usage of another language, French for example? I guess I could just look it up, but I thought I'd mention it here. Also, "ampersand" is a neat name, but who came up with it?
&&&Et&
Kizyr wrote:
Return to Language/Linguistics
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest