Moderators: jestingrabbit, Moderators General, Prelates
poxic wrote:Y'know, tina-mat, I hadn't realised until today that your avatar was a stabby little girl. I just thought she was wanking her ponytails.
Box Boy wrote:tina-mat is my lord and master.
poxic wrote:Y'know, tina-mat, I hadn't realised until today that your avatar was a stabby little girl. I just thought she was wanking her ponytails.
Box Boy wrote:tina-mat is my lord and master.
poxic wrote:Y'know, tina-mat, I hadn't realised until today that your avatar was a stabby little girl. I just thought she was wanking her ponytails.
Box Boy wrote:tina-mat is my lord and master.
tina-mat wrote:Tillan wrote:ok!
Let's link these two threads together!
tina-mat wrote:I fixed the whitespace for you.Tillan wrote:Wow! awesome idea!tina-mat wrote:Let's link these two threads together!Tillan wrote:ok!
tina-mat wrote:You are most welcome.Tillan wrote:Oh, Thanks ^_^tina-mat wrote:I fixed the whitespace for you.Tillan wrote:Wow! awesome idea!tina-mat wrote:Let's link these two threads together!Tillan wrote:ok!
I do, alas T_Ttina-mat wrote:If only we had more space in our signatures. Do you know what I mean?Tillan wrote:tina-mat wrote:You are most welcome.Tillan wrote:Oh, Thanks ^_^tina-mat wrote:I fixed the whitespace for you.Tillan wrote:Wow! awesome idea!tina-mat wrote:Let's link these two threads together!Tillan wrote:ok!
You know, this is a much more ffiecent use of the forums, by doing this anybody can browse to a thread quickly, and see all the previous conversation in one post. On top of that its repeated in a couple of threads, and so you are less likely to miss it ^_^
hmm, there may be other ways...tina-mat wrote:We could do it the DROP DATABASE way, with an embedded, spoilered image with the conversation, but I don't orc.Tillan wrote:I do, alas T_Ttina-mat wrote:If only we had more space in our signatures. Do you know what I mean?Tillan wrote:tina-mat wrote:You are most welcome.Tillan wrote:Oh, Thanks ^_^tina-mat wrote:I fixed the whitespace for you.Tillan wrote:Wow! awesome idea!tina-mat wrote:Let's link these two threads together!Tillan wrote:ok!
You know, this is a much more ffiecent use of the forums, by doing this anybody can browse to a thread quickly, and see all the previous conversation in one post. On top of that its repeated in a couple of threads, and so you are less likely to miss it ^_^
After a quick google, i think you may be right, i seem to remember a site that converted text into an encoded image, but it looks like it conks out after fewer characters then the sig allows.tina-mat wrote:I can think of other ways, but they require javascript in order to be inline. If they aren't, we could just mail each other, and that wouldn't make the other's happier.Tillan wrote:hmm, there may be other ways...tina-mat wrote:We could do it the DROP DATABASE way, with an embedded, spoilered image with the conversation, but I don't orc.Tillan wrote:I do, alas T_Ttina-mat wrote:If only we had more space in our signatures. Do you know what I mean?Tillan wrote:tina-mat wrote:You are most welcome.Tillan wrote:Oh, Thanks ^_^tina-mat wrote:I fixed the whitespace for you.Tillan wrote:Wow! awesome idea!tina-mat wrote:Let's link these two threads together!Tillan wrote:ok!
You know, this is a much more ffiecent use of the forums, by doing this anybody can browse to a thread quickly, and see all the previous conversation in one post. On top of that its repeated in a couple of threads, and so you are less likely to miss it ^_^
Tillan wrote:After a quick google, i think you may be right, i seem to remember a site that converted text into an encoded image, but it looks like it conks out after fewer characters then the sig allows.tina-mat wrote:I can think of other ways, but they require javascript in order to be inline. If they aren't, we could just mail each other, and that wouldn't make the other's happier.Tillan wrote:hmm, there may be other ways...tina-mat wrote:We could do it the DROP DATABASE way, with an embedded, spoilered image with the conversation, but I don't orc.Tillan wrote:I do, alas T_Ttina-mat wrote:If only we had more space in our signatures. Do you know what I mean?Tillan wrote:tina-mat wrote:You are most welcome.Tillan wrote:Oh, Thanks ^_^tina-mat wrote:I fixed the whitespace for you.Tillan wrote:Wow! awesome idea!tina-mat wrote:Let's link these two threads together!Tillan wrote:ok!
You know, this is a much more ffiecent use of the forums, by doing this anybody can browse to a thread quickly, and see all the previous conversation in one post. On top of that its repeated in a couple of threads, and so you are less likely to miss it ^_^
Tillian wrote:Yeah, but the polar bears get more territorial during the summer, so we have to stay indoors.
hmm, i could host it, but coding it is a lil out my league.tina-mat wrote:Hm. I might be able to whip something up in Python, but I don't have time right now. Also, I don't have anywhere to host it.Tillan wrote:After a quick google, i think you may be right, i seem to remember a site that converted text into an encoded image, but it looks like it conks out after fewer characters then the sig allows.tina-mat wrote:I can think of other ways, but they require javascript in order to be inline. If they aren't, we could just mail each other, and that wouldn't make the other's happier.Tillan wrote:hmm, there may be other ways...tina-mat wrote:We could do it the DROP DATABASE way, with an embedded, spoilered image with the conversation, but I don't orc.Tillan wrote:I do, alas T_Ttina-mat wrote:If only we had more space in our signatures. Do you know what I mean?Tillan wrote:tina-mat wrote:You are most welcome.Tillan wrote:Oh, Thanks ^_^tina-mat wrote:I fixed the whitespace for you.Tillan wrote:Wow! awesome idea!tina-mat wrote:Let's link these two threads together!Tillan wrote:ok!
You know, this is a much more ffiecent use of the forums, by doing this anybody can browse to a thread quickly, and see all the previous conversation in one post. On top of that its repeated in a couple of threads, and so you are less likely to miss it ^_^
poxic wrote:Y'know, tina-mat, I hadn't realised until today that your avatar was a stabby little girl. I just thought she was wanking her ponytails.
Box Boy wrote:tina-mat is my lord and master.
hmm, ild need to check, however even if i cant i should be able to whip something up with somebody else.tina-mat wrote:Hm, that would be awesome. Can you install third-party libraries (which I would need)?Tillan wrote:hmm, i could host it, but coding it is a lil out my league.tina-mat wrote:Hm. I might be able to whip something up in Python, but I don't have time right now. Also, I don't have anywhere to host it.Tillan wrote:After a quick google, i think you may be right, i seem to remember a site that converted text into an encoded image, but it looks like it conks out after fewer characters then the sig allows.tina-mat wrote:I can think of other ways, but they require javascript in order to be inline. If they aren't, we could just mail each other, and that wouldn't make the other's happier.Tillan wrote:hmm, there may be other ways...tina-mat wrote:We could do it the DROP DATABASE way, with an embedded, spoilered image with the conversation, but I don't orc.Tillan wrote:I do, alas T_Ttina-mat wrote:If only we had more space in our signatures. Do you know what I mean?Tillan wrote:tina-mat wrote:You are most welcome.Tillan wrote:Oh, Thanks ^_^tina-mat wrote:I fixed the whitespace for you.Tillan wrote:Wow! awesome idea!tina-mat wrote:Let's link these two threads together!Tillan wrote:ok!
You know, this is a much more ffiecent use of the forums, by doing this anybody can browse to a thread quickly, and see all the previous conversation in one post. On top of that its repeated in a couple of threads, and so you are less likely to miss it ^_^
yes, another server, i have a few static ip's to play with, so if my webhoster (well, email really) didnt want me to use 3rd party libraries (which i would say is probable) i could have set up one myself pretty easily myself anyways.tina-mat wrote:I just realized I'm not an expert on CGI security issues, and I don't want to cause any harm, so on second thought, I may not be the best person to do this.tina-mat wrote:As in another server or another method?Tillan wrote:hmm, ild need to check, however even if i cant i should be able to whip something up with somebody else.tina-mat wrote:Hm, that would be awesome. Can you install third-party libraries (which I would need)?Tillan wrote:hmm, i could host it, but coding it is a lil out my league.tina-mat wrote:Hm. I might be able to whip something up in Python, but I don't have time right now. Also, I don't have anywhere to host it.Tillan wrote:After a quick google, i think you may be right, i seem to remember a site that converted text into an encoded image, but it looks like it conks out after fewer characters then the sig allows.tina-mat wrote:I can think of other ways, but they require javascript in order to be inline. If they aren't, we could just mail each other, and that wouldn't make the other's happier.Tillan wrote:hmm, there may be other ways...tina-mat wrote:We could do it the DROP DATABASE way, with an embedded, spoilered image with the conversation, but I don't orc.Tillan wrote:I do, alas T_Ttina-mat wrote:If only we had more space in our signatures. Do you know what I mean?Tillan wrote:tina-mat wrote:You are most welcome.Tillan wrote:Oh, Thanks ^_^tina-mat wrote:I fixed the whitespace for you.Tillan wrote:Wow! awesome idea!tina-mat wrote:Let's link these two threads together!Tillan wrote:ok!
You know, this is a much more ffiecent use of the forums, by doing this anybody can browse to a thread quickly, and see all the previous conversation in one post. On top of that its repeated in a couple of threads, and so you are less likely to miss it ^_^
Actually, if worried about security, i could maybe host it on a virtual server, and lock it off from the rest of the network. hmm....tina-mat wrote:Coolio!Tillan wrote:yes, another server, i have a few static ip's to play with, so if my webhoster (well, email really) didnt want me to use 3rd party libraries (which i would say is probable) i could have set up one myself pretty easily myself anyways.tina-mat wrote:I just realized I'm not an expert on CGI security issues, and I don't want to cause any harm, so on second thought, I may not be the best person to do this.tina-mat wrote:As in another server or another method?Tillan wrote:hmm, ild need to check, however even if i cant i should be able to whip something up with somebody else.tina-mat wrote:Hm, that would be awesome. Can you install third-party libraries (which I would need)?Tillan wrote:hmm, i could host it, but coding it is a lil out my league.tina-mat wrote:Hm. I might be able to whip something up in Python, but I don't have time right now. Also, I don't have anywhere to host it.Tillan wrote:After a quick google, i think you may be right, i seem to remember a site that converted text into an encoded image, but it looks like it conks out after fewer characters then the sig allows.tina-mat wrote:I can think of other ways, but they require javascript in order to be inline. If they aren't, we could just mail each other, and that wouldn't make the other's happier.Tillan wrote:hmm, there may be other ways...tina-mat wrote:We could do it the DROP DATABASE way, with an embedded, spoilered image with the conversation, but I don't orc.Tillan wrote:I do, alas T_Ttina-mat wrote:If only we had more space in our signatures. Do you know what I mean?Tillan wrote:tina-mat wrote:You are most welcome.Tillan wrote:Oh, Thanks ^_^tina-mat wrote:I fixed the whitespace for you.Tillan wrote:Wow! awesome idea!tina-mat wrote:Let's link these two threads together!Tillan wrote:ok!
You know, this is a much more ffiecent use of the forums, by doing this anybody can browse to a thread quickly, and see all the previous conversation in one post. On top of that its repeated in a couple of threads, and so you are less likely to miss it ^_^
^ Is awesomeFractal_Tangent wrote:^is wrong.(sorry again)Tillan wrote:^ Is wrong about < being confusedFractal_Tangent wrote:Tillan wrote:^ Needs to look at two threads and piece two and two together.Fractal_Tangent wrote:^Is correct. =]
< Wonders what is with the misquotings and time travel.
V Will explain?
< Will explain no more than that, has this post as something of a clue.
v will not reply to this message.
> LOVES!
^Kind of explained.
< Thinks she gets it now.
V Is confused?
< Is one of the people that started it
v will probably reply to this thread and be boring
> LOVES!
< would have expected nothing less from her bff.
V Is a genius.
mickyj300x wrote:I choose to post here! MWUHAHAHAhahahahahaha.aa *cough*
BigBoss wrote:mickyj300x wrote:I choose to post here! MWUHAHAHAhahahahahaha.aa *cough*

Now that I finally got the chance to bump this, I've forgotten what I was to say. It might have been along the lines of "yes".Tillan wrote:a while ago, myself and tina went a lil bit crazy, replying to questions in different threads, quoting the whole of the previous conversation. Tina's half will be in a different thread somewhere, I would say try the maximise thread, or the 1000 days thread if you really wanted to see, but really, everything he said was quoted in my posts.
poxic wrote:Y'know, tina-mat, I hadn't realised until today that your avatar was a stabby little girl. I just thought she was wanking her ponytails.
Box Boy wrote:tina-mat is my lord and master.
Nemphael wrote:CD-ROM drives were originally designed to send small pancakes through the internet. This didn't work, and has since made a lot of people sad.
Tillan wrote:=p
Nemphael wrote:CD-ROM drives were originally designed to send small pancakes through the internet. This didn't work, and has since made a lot of people sad.
Silvyr wrote:I fucking love cocaine. I wish I could buy it somewhere...
videogamesizzle wrote:Wait, are you saying you're not a goddess?
Man, I made a shrine and everything!
Users browsing this forum: Amianym, Bakstoola, Bing [Bot], GuetraGma, patzer and 4 guests