0683: "Science Montage"

This forum is for the individual discussion thread that goes with each new comic.

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

User avatar
plin25
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 5:32 am UTC
Location: Lost in my mind
Contact:

0683: "Science Montage"

Postby plin25 » Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:03 am UTC

Image
Title text: The rat's perturbed; it must sense nanobots! Code grey! We have a Helvetica scenario!

Crazy movies and their unrealistic science
´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸ }<((((((º>

Capissen
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:06 am UTC

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby Capissen » Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:08 am UTC

I registered just now simply to express how awesome Randall is for making a "Look Around You" reference. For those who don't get it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aY7XH2ulTEU

spiffytech
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:09 am UTC

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby spiffytech » Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:13 am UTC

Bonus points for the Look Around You reference!

JustMe
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:21 pm UTC
Location: Washington (the real one - not D.C)

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby JustMe » Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:15 am UTC

This is AWESOME! I've spent so much of my life explaining concepts such as "margin of error". From now on, I'm just handing out copies of this comic.
I have traveled from 1963 to be a member of the unofficial board Council of Elders. Phear M3

erhbr
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:06 am UTC

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby erhbr » Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:16 am UTC

Danger!
Helvetica!

acidcj
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:27 pm UTC

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby acidcj » Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:16 am UTC

Aw, no New Year's/Decade's Comic? Also, didn't catch the reference. :(

westrim
Posts: 153
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:51 am UTC

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby westrim » Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:20 am UTC

Oh god, not Helvetica! Anything but Helvetica! :shock:

User avatar
TheChewanater
Posts: 1279
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:24 am UTC
Location: lol why am I still wearing a Santa suit?

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby TheChewanater » Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:32 am UTC

Disappointing. Though, it might be because I didn't get the reference.
ImageImage
http://internetometer.com/give/4279
No one can agree how to count how many types of people there are. You could ask two people and get 10 different answers.

User avatar
XbHW_TestEngr
Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 9:29 pm UTC
Location: Kirkland, WA
Contact:

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby XbHW_TestEngr » Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:39 am UTC

Nicely done. But, my non-science friends and family still won't understand.
... and there will be cake.

I have traveled from 1960 to be a member of the unofficial Council of Elders. Phear M3

benbald72 wrote:I feel connected to the author and therefore appreciate the comic, regardless of whether or not I understand the joke ....

10nitro
Posts: 192
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 pm UTC
Contact:

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby 10nitro » Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:41 am UTC

Dissapointing. The first decade of the future is now over.
~ Luke Shumaker
FRC1024 Programmer
IT technician, GNU/Linux admin, comp. security guy
Eagle Scout
http://lukeshu.ath.cx

SolkaTruesilver
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 11:30 am UTC

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby SolkaTruesilver » Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:51 am UTC

TheChewanater wrote:Disappointing. Though, it might be because I didn't get the reference.


you do know that you just given this comic's rant for Xkcd Sucks? Otherwise, the comic was perfect ennough that these loosers wouldn't have found flaw without making up one :-(




;-)


User avatar
Chicostick
Posts: 410
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 4:19 am UTC
Location: The boonies of Maine

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby Chicostick » Fri Jan 01, 2010 6:11 am UTC

The Helvetica scenario seriously terrifies me. I hope it never happens to me...

User avatar
chridd
Has a vermicelli title
Posts: 846
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 10:07 am UTC
Location: ...Earth, I guess?
Contact:

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby chridd » Fri Jan 01, 2010 6:31 am UTC

Chicostick wrote:The Helvetica scenario seriously terrifies me. I hope it never happens to me...

Considering that calcium is an atom, not a molecule, and that there is no such thing as a "queen atom"... I think you'll be okay.
~ chri d. d. /tʃɹɪ.di.di/ (Phonotactics, schmphonotactics) · she · Forum game scores
mittfh wrote:I wish this post was very quotable...

User avatar
Amnesiasoft
Posts: 2573
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 4:28 am UTC
Location: Colorado
Contact:

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby Amnesiasoft » Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:32 am UTC

chridd wrote:Considering that calcium is an atom, not a molecule, and that there is no such thing as a "queen atom"... I think you'll be okay.

No wonder I got a 1 on my AP Chem exam :(

Draco18s
Posts: 89
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 7:50 am UTC

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby Draco18s » Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:54 am UTC

At least you know Helvetica is a font family, right?

fealuinix
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:39 pm UTC

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby fealuinix » Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:48 am UTC

That video clip only raises more questions...

So we have some pseudo-science on calcium, and if the molecule falls apart...people lose their face? Seriously, what does that have to do with anything?

Unless it's instead a reference to whatever the hell that was, I'm assuming 'code grey' is in reference to grey goo.

blackenedbutterfly
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:53 am UTC

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby blackenedbutterfly » Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:55 am UTC

Capissen wrote:I registered just now simply to express how awesome Randall is for making a "Look Around You" reference. For those who don't get it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aY7XH2ulTEU


This. This right here and then.

fealuinix - see the rest of the series for your answer.

User avatar
LtBonzai
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:48 pm UTC

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby LtBonzai » Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:59 am UTC

Capissen wrote:I registered just now simply to express how awesome Randall is for making a "Look Around You" reference. For those who don't get it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aY7XH2ulTEU



Wow, that faceless guy has me scarred for life. No amount of cheese burns can ever save me, now.

User avatar
Omegaton
Posts: 700
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 6:23 pm UTC

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby Omegaton » Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:10 am UTC

Yeah, doing real science isn't like the movies...

User avatar
Mo6eB
Posts: 60
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 9:20 pm UTC
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby Mo6eB » Fri Jan 01, 2010 10:50 am UTC

Randall's art makes it hard to determine, but I'm almost certain there are two men in the right half, while in the left there is a male and a female scientist.
GENERATION [imath]\aleph_{1}[/imath] : Whenever you wish, copy this into your sig on any forum and increase the generation to the next transfinite cardinal. Social experiment NOT over.
Image

Rabbethan
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 12:32 pm UTC

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby Rabbethan » Fri Jan 01, 2010 12:33 pm UTC

I don't know what was in the vial on the right but it made her lab coat see-through!

Technical Ben
Posts: 2986
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 10:42 pm UTC

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby Technical Ben » Fri Jan 01, 2010 12:41 pm UTC

I thought only we watched here and now in the uk? It's great someone else "got it" in a humour sense. It's like a photocopy [xerox] of my old Science Video lessons at school. Only photocopied so many times that it stops making sense. It is scary that they could have been saying the exact same things at school and I'd be none the wiser. For a little while at least.

On the comic note, it needs to be much longer. Most movie science takes one hour or one day. In the real world it can take days or weeks for some things to be grown, tested or pulled apart.
It's all physics and stamp collecting.
It's not a particle or a wave. It's just an exchange.

lingomaniac88
Posts: 127
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 2:52 am UTC

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby lingomaniac88 » Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:09 pm UTC

I'm just wondering why the guy in the Actual Science Montage set of panels took off his safety goggles in the third panel.
"It is common sense to take a method and try it. If it fails, admit it frankly and try another. But above all, try something."
-- Franklin D. Roosevelt

User avatar
You, sir, name?
Posts: 6983
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:07 am UTC
Location: Chako Paul City
Contact:

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby You, sir, name? » Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:21 pm UTC

"Actual Science Montage" needs to be in a room half the size, with a substandard fluorescent light, and a very noisy but ineffective ventilation. Oh, and take 4 hours longer.
I edit my posts a lot and sometimes the words wrong order words appear in sentences get messed up.

User avatar
BioTube
Posts: 362
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 2:11 am UTC

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby BioTube » Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:32 pm UTC

lingomaniac88 wrote:I'm just wondering why the guy in the Actual Science Montage set of panels took off his safety goggles in the third panel.
Considering the two-hour time skip, he was clearly busy elsewhere on just came to check on the thing. He merely brought them with him in case it had finished.
Frédéric Bastiat wrote:Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else.

User avatar
Stripy-Artist
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:27 pm UTC

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby Stripy-Artist » Fri Jan 01, 2010 3:38 pm UTC

Mo6eB wrote:Randall's art makes it hard to determine, but I'm almost certain there are two men in the right half, while in the left there is a male and a female scientist.


On both sides, one of the scientists has a ponytail . Be sure to take another look!
Image

User avatar
You, sir, name?
Posts: 6983
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:07 am UTC
Location: Chako Paul City
Contact:

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby You, sir, name? » Fri Jan 01, 2010 3:49 pm UTC

Stripy-Artist wrote:
Mo6eB wrote:Randall's art makes it hard to determine, but I'm almost certain there are two men in the right half, while in the left there is a male and a female scientist.


On both sides, one of the scientists has a ponytail . Be sure to take another look!


Well, since long haire is overrepresented among scientists, and women are underrepresented among scientists, that really doesn't give any clue to the gender of either pony tailed scientist.
I edit my posts a lot and sometimes the words wrong order words appear in sentences get messed up.

User avatar
SunDawg
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:17 pm UTC

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby SunDawg » Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:04 pm UTC

In the second panel of movie-science, one of the rats is on the girl's head.

That is all I have to say.

User avatar
You, sir, name?
Posts: 6983
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:07 am UTC
Location: Chako Paul City
Contact:

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby You, sir, name? » Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:11 pm UTC

This is also relevant to this comic: http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive ... micid=1156
I edit my posts a lot and sometimes the words wrong order words appear in sentences get messed up.

Technical Ben
Posts: 2986
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 10:42 pm UTC

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby Technical Ben » Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:49 pm UTC

SunDawg wrote:In the second panel of movie-science, one of the rats is on the girl's head.

That is all I have to say.


Oh My Gosh! I never noticed that! How did I not notice that...?
It's all physics and stamp collecting.
It's not a particle or a wave. It's just an exchange.

User avatar
Eikinkloster
Posts: 211
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 1:07 pm UTC
Location: Brazil

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby Eikinkloster » Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:05 pm UTC

But is the term Helvetica Scenario on Look Around You anything but random? Any reference to the fractured nature of Switzerland?
Chaos Reigns!

santiago
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 9:35 pm UTC

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby santiago » Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:23 pm UTC

I always imagine it like this. A huge room with an LHC-like machine and guys in white coats. Theres a lot of monitors around showing pointlessly stylized, moving, flashing graphs. They press a button.

-Time?
-93 seconds
-Damn, we're so close. More power
*scared looks between colleagues*
-But sir...
-I SAID MORE POWER. I know the risks damnit, we're about to lose our funding.

Then of course something goes wrong and they are taught a lesson of humility, because them scientists should have never messed with creation.

Foweraker
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:33 pm UTC

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby Foweraker » Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:38 pm UTC

To those of you asking for an end of the decade comic, you are aware we have another 365 days of the 2000s left?

Seriously it is like the millenium all over again! The first thing you count is not 0!

rcox1
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:23 pm UTC

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby rcox1 » Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:47 pm UTC

The worst thing about movie science is that it tricks kids into thinking that science has that level of excitement and instant gratification. Then they get into college and realize the truth. I suspect it is the same thing for kids who got into law after watching legally blonde. I just imagine a bunch of kids thinking that there must be something more to physics than free body or Feynman diagrams. Those crafty profs must be hiding the good stuff for themselves. The kids are probably right.

User avatar
DoctorSubmarine
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:35 am UTC
Location: Someplace Clever
Contact:

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby DoctorSubmarine » Fri Jan 01, 2010 6:09 pm UTC

Foweraker wrote:To those of you asking for an end of the decade comic, you are aware we have another 365 days of the 2000s left?

Seriously it is like the millenium all over again! The first thing you count is not 0!


A decade is a unit of time measuring 10 years.

Year 1: 2000
Year 2: 2001
Year 3: 2002
Year 4: 2003
Year 5: 2004
Year 6: 2005
Year 7: 2006
Year 8: 2007
Year 9: 2008
Year 10: 2009

Therefore, this IS the end of the decade.
Careful, we don't want to learn from this.

User avatar
You, sir, name?
Posts: 6983
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:07 am UTC
Location: Chako Paul City
Contact:

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby You, sir, name? » Fri Jan 01, 2010 6:35 pm UTC

DoctorSubmarine wrote:
Foweraker wrote:To those of you asking for an end of the decade comic, you are aware we have another 365 days of the 2000s left?

Seriously it is like the millenium all over again! The first thing you count is not 0!


A decade is a unit of time measuring 10 years.

Year 1: 2000
Year 2: 2001
Year 3: 2002
Year 4: 2003
Year 5: 2004
Year 6: 2005
Year 7: 2006
Year 8: 2007
Year 9: 2008
Year 10: 2009

Therefore, this IS the end of the decade.


It is the end of the decade that started year 2000. Obviously, you are free to arbitrarily define the start of a decade. It is most certainly not the end of the decade that started April 21 2004.
I edit my posts a lot and sometimes the words wrong order words appear in sentences get messed up.

User avatar
DoctorSubmarine
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:35 am UTC
Location: Someplace Clever
Contact:

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby DoctorSubmarine » Fri Jan 01, 2010 6:48 pm UTC

You, sir, name? wrote:
DoctorSubmarine wrote:
Foweraker wrote:To those of you asking for an end of the decade comic, you are aware we have another 365 days of the 2000s left?

Seriously it is like the millenium all over again! The first thing you count is not 0!


A decade is a unit of time measuring 10 years.

Year 1: 2000
Year 2: 2001
Year 3: 2002
Year 4: 2003
Year 5: 2004
Year 6: 2005
Year 7: 2006
Year 8: 2007
Year 9: 2008
Year 10: 2009

Therefore, this IS the end of the decade.


It is the end of the decade that started year 2000. Obviously, you are free to arbitrarily define the start of a decade. It is most certainly not the end of the decade that started April 21 2004.


Point, taken.

Anyway, loved the comic!
Careful, we don't want to learn from this.

User avatar
BioTube
Posts: 362
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 2:11 am UTC

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby BioTube » Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:18 pm UTC

Foweraker wrote:Seriously it is like the millenium all over again! The first thing you count is not 0!
C would like a word with you.
Frédéric Bastiat wrote:Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else.

User avatar
Steve the Pocket
Posts: 707
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 4:02 am UTC
Location: Going downtuuu in a Luleelurah!

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby Steve the Pocket » Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:19 pm UTC

I'm still convinced there needs to be a band called The Helvetica Scenario. Preferably a good band, since otherwise that would be kind of embarrassing.
cephalopod9 wrote:Only on Xkcd can you start a topic involving Hitler and people spend the better part of half a dozen pages arguing about the quality of Operating Systems.

Baige.

User avatar
TheChewanater
Posts: 1279
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:24 am UTC
Location: lol why am I still wearing a Santa suit?

Re: "Science Montage" Discussion

Postby TheChewanater » Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:21 pm UTC

Foweraker wrote:To those of you asking for an end of the decade comic, you are aware we have another 365 days of the 2000s left?

Seriously it is like the millenium all over again! The first thing you count is not 0!

Image
ImageImage
http://internetometer.com/give/4279
No one can agree how to count how many types of people there are. You could ask two people and get 10 different answers.


Return to “Individual XKCD Comic Threads”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: serutan and 100 guests