Moderators: Mighty Jalapeno, Moderators General, Prelates
General_Norris wrote:I notice a lack of counter-arguments and a lot of fisting.
Izawwlgood wrote:Training for the tri, did a 10k bike, 5k run in 40 minutes. The swim was a joke (joke like, ow, ow, drowning... i hate swimming...)
Anyone ever crash an official event? Just ninja it, get in and run, come out of the chute and walk off?
Captain Kirk wrote:Hey, everybody.
I have recently felt the urge to lose some weight, by dieting, running, and doing home exercises(i.e. push-ups, sit-ups, etc.). I'm not planning on doing anything completely drastic to my diet, just cutting out excessive and fatty things and eating more fruits and veggies. I weigh about 185-190, and am 5'10-11". I was an athletic and active child, and I'm still good at sports, but to be frank, I'm lazy. I want to start running and exercising again. I know I can run 1/2 a mile in under four minutes, and a full mile at about ten.
I just got this pair of Puma shoes:
http://www.shop.puma.com/Cell-Cerae-III ... cgid=23120
Are these good for running? I'm on a budget right now, so they're all I've got.
Anyway, I plan to start running early every morning before I get ready for school. I plan on running for a good 20-30 minutes. My main question is, for optimum weight loss, how often should I run and how long for?
Thanks for any advice
voidPtr wrote:Apologies if this has already been asked..I glanced through the thread and couldn't see anything.
I'm just getting into running now.All the literature on the blagotube I'm reading suggest starting with the walk/run routine. Walk for 5 minutes, run for 1 minute, repeat for a half hour gradually building up to running for 20minutes over 6-8weeks.
This seems pretty tedious to me. I ran a bit many years ago, and although I'm not in the best shape of my life at the moment, I can still maintain a good running pace for 3-4km, or say, 20minutes, and I'd rather just do that with a 5-minute warmup/cooldown walk at the beginning and end of the run.
The question is, by going for the all-out run, am I setting myself up for injury or poor longterm results? Should I go with the run/walk routine for a few weeks and weeks (maybe fasttracking it a little bit..say 4 weeks and weeks..)?
I did this when I was in Rome last weekend, sort of... I knew about a race going on in a big park downtown, so I ran ~5 miles to get there, it was already just starting, I jumped in the pack in probably about 50th place, worked my way up and enjoyed the course, probably finishing around 25th. (The lucky part was they happened to give out T-shirts after the race, rather than before, and they had plenty so they still gave me one.)Izawwlgood wrote:Anyone ever crash an official event? Just ninja it, get in and run, come out of the chute and walk off?
Dynokate wrote:I do enjoy running, though...once it's over. After a good run ("good" being entirely relative), I feel AWESOME! I just need to figure out how to get the distance/time up. I'm not sure how long, realistically, it's going to take for me to get better at this. Any tips?
Dynokate wrote:Hello everyone! I'm just starting running this week, and I'm having issues. I can only keep up running steadily for a couple minutes straight. I know that I should aim for 30-ish minutes, but after five or ten I feel like I'm DYING.
If by the 'end' you mean the last 2-400m, just keep it steady. Unless it's a race, it's not worth wasting a burst of energy and could be unnecessarily bad for your legs... It is good, I think, to run strides after a run (~100m, 3 or 4 times, run harder than normal but not sprinting) because they help smoothen out form and build that muscle memory to run more efficiently. If by the 'end' of the run you mean the last significant portion of the run (the last couple miles or so), there's nothing wrong with picking up the pace, but there's no need to sprint the last little bit.Taiyo wrote:PS: General question: is it better to try to accelerate at the end of your run, or is it better to just keep going at a steady pace to finish off?
General_Norris wrote:I notice a lack of counter-arguments and a lot of fisting.
Awesome time. Your goal is similar to mine. 2:50 pace is a good target.duckshirt wrote:Well, I now have a marathon in the books. 3:07...
RoadieRich wrote:Thicknavyrain is appointed Nex Artifex, Author of Death of the second FaiD Assassins' Guild.
Nath wrote:Any forefoot runners here? I've been looking for some minimalist running shoes without too much heel. Considering the Puma Speeder M. Any experience with this shoe?
I've also considered the K Street II (a favorite of the POSE community), and a couple of Saucony shoes (Bullet and Kilkenny XC).
More general recommendations on this sort of running are also welcome.
General_Norris wrote:I notice a lack of counter-arguments and a lot of fisting.
Nath wrote:Any forefoot runners here? I've been looking for some minimalist running shoes without too much heel. Considering the Puma Speeder M. Any experience with this shoe?
I've also considered the K Street II (a favorite of the POSE community), and a couple of Saucony shoes (Bullet and Kilkenny XC).
More general recommendations on this sort of running are also welcome.
Nath wrote:I currently don't run at all. I'm probably reasonably conditioned from my sport, but I'll have to start slow on the running, forefoot or otherwise.
From what I've read online about the Speeder, it's a reasonable shoe, but wears out quickly. Considering the Onitsuka Tiger 81 instead.
Nath wrote:True. Then again, the Tiger 81 is in the same price range, and weighs about an ounce more.
Nath wrote:True. Then again, the Tiger 81 is in the same price range, and weighs about an ounce more.
viscusanima wrote:I've begun to run 10k quite often in the past couple of months, and I'm curious as to what the best strategy would be to get my time down, stamina up, sprint length up etc?
LE4dGOLEM wrote:if you cannot choose, flip a coinSpoiler:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests