Moderators: Moderators General, Magistrates, Prelates
SadinaSaphrite wrote:Okay, we're almost at the spawn point ... separate the labia, but watch out, there are more inside them ............Leerooooy Jeeeenkiiiiins!
nealh wrote:Suggestion: Separate thread for people to discuss whether or not the comic was up to par. Maybe we can even add a poll shaped like a thermometer with cold cheese at the bottom and cheese fusion at the top. I'd appreciate it so I don't have to wade through the inane opinions to get to what I really want; hilarious commentary like the following:SadinaSaphrite wrote:Okay, we're almost at the spawn point ... separate the labia, but watch out, there are more inside them ............Leerooooy Jeeeenkiiiiins!
Also kudos to the additional Pylons guy, though I'm not sure what that would even mean in this context. Boobs = pylons?
neoliminal wrote:Nitrocloud wrote:It's sad that society has such the preoccupation with sexual encounters, individual pleasure, and lack of want of service.
Citation needed.
Thanks, I didn't know that.thorvoquien wrote:Try m.xkcd.com for devices without title text viewing capability. Not sure why they don't advertise this better!
Taco wrote:nealh wrote:Suggestion: Separate thread for people to discuss whether or not the comic was up to par. Maybe we can even add a poll shaped like a thermometer with cold cheese at the bottom and cheese fusion at the top. I'd appreciate it so I don't have to wade through the inane opinions to get to what I really want; hilarious commentary like the following:SadinaSaphrite wrote:Okay, we're almost at the spawn point ... separate the labia, but watch out, there are more inside them ............Leerooooy Jeeeenkiiiiins!
Also kudos to the additional Pylons guy, though I'm not sure what that would even mean in this context. Boobs = pylons?
You know that you are basically saying, "I don't want to hurt Randall's ego, put the criticism somewhere else," right? Please tell me that you were being sarcastic.
Taco wrote:You know that you are basically saying, "I don't want to hurt Randall's ego, put the criticism somewhere else," right? Please tell me that you were being sarcastic.
Pfhorrest wrote:Taco wrote:You know that you are basically saying, "I don't want to hurt Randall's ego, put the criticism somewhere else," right? Please tell me that you were being sarcastic.
Separate threads idea aside, I really do like the idea of a cheese thermometer to rate each comic. It would allow people to do easy searches for most or least popular comics (maybe have the five thumbnails at the bottom of the main page be auto-generated from the top five most popular comics?), and possibly give Randall some better-quantified feedback, too.
Something about the word "pylon" evokes a shaft-like image in my mind. Um...moving on.nealh wrote:Suggestion: Separate thread for people to discuss whether or not the comic was up to par. Maybe we can even add a poll shaped like a thermometer with cold cheese at the bottom and cheese fusion at the top. I'd appreciate it so I don't have to wade through the inane opinions to get to what I really want; hilarious commentary like the following:SadinaSaphrite wrote:Okay, we're almost at the spawn point ... separate the labia, but watch out, there are more inside them ............Leerooooy Jeeeenkiiiiins!
Also kudos to the additional Pylons guy, though I'm not sure what that would even mean in this context. Boobs = pylons?
Oh snap! I almost forgot.Kelaos wrote:P.S.
Also completely off-topic but: Don't forget that tomorrow is Towel Day. (Surprised today's comic wasn't a Hitchhiker's reference)
Some Sort of Shuriken-Based PropulsionGeogriffith wrote:Dad, where is Grandpa right now?
"His source code was forked, backups moved off-site, and merged with a compatible project with similar goals. As was mine, as will yours be, someday."

mosc wrote:Endless Mike wrote:The military wrote custom PS3 software and bought a bunch of them for some very specific application.
A modern warfare lan party, duh.
db85 wrote:So am I the only one that thought that "speed run" referred to his sexual performance and not the walkthrough? It seems like all the comments here are attaching the "speed run" to the walkthrough... but the other guy asked him how his date went, and he's answering that question. Plus, it makes the 'ouch' much more funny.
xkcd sucks wrote:Guys, remember how xkcd used to be super obsessed with sex? I had almost forgotten, it had been so long. Luckily the theme's absence has now ended. This quirky character was so nerdy that he has confused sex with video games! How is that even possible??
The humor begins with the fact that this character is going to be uneducated about sex. You see, that will lead to awkwardness and if there is anything funnier than sex, it is awkward sex. So we know, simply because he says he'll need instructions, that he will have some hilarious troubles.
And then he can't even do that right! He gets the video wrong, and so he had even more awkward sex! I haven't laughed this hard since middle school when a teacher farted.
My goodness. How much lamer can you get than this comic? It's like a machine was told to look at all the previous xkcd comics and figure out how to make new ones, and it spit out "SEX PLUS VIDEO GAME. COMBINE THEM. THINK OF ONE IN TERMS OF THE OTHER." Does it matter that there couldn't even be a speedrun of sex? That it doesn't make sense as an idea?
I guess there will always be adults who are still amused by this sort of thing. Look: I have no problem with jokes about sex and stuff. It's just like reference-based humor: There's nothing wrong with making jokes that reference other works, and there's nothing wrong with making jokes about sex. The problem is when there is no real joke, and instead you are supposed to laugh merely because sex was brought up at all, and ha ha we are all still nervous about that.
That's really all this joke is: there's sort of a pun thing about video games and speed runs but it makes so little sense that i think we can all agree that the only reason anyone laughs at it is because: sex. and that is just lazy, when you get down to it.
Taco wrote:xkcd sucks wrote:Guys, remember how xkcd used to be super obsessed with sex? I had almost forgotten, it had been so long. Luckily the theme's absence has now ended. This quirky character was so nerdy that he has confused sex with video games! How is that even possible??
The humor begins with the fact that this character is going to be uneducated about sex. You see, that will lead to awkwardness and if there is anything funnier than sex, it is awkward sex. So we know, simply because he says he'll need instructions, that he will have some hilarious troubles.
And then he can't even do that right! He gets the video wrong, and so he had even more awkward sex! I haven't laughed this hard since middle school when a teacher farted.
My goodness. How much lamer can you get than this comic? It's like a machine was told to look at all the previous xkcd comics and figure out how to make new ones, and it spit out "SEX PLUS VIDEO GAME. COMBINE THEM. THINK OF ONE IN TERMS OF THE OTHER." Does it matter that there couldn't even be a speedrun of sex? That it doesn't make sense as an idea?
I guess there will always be adults who are still amused by this sort of thing. Look: I have no problem with jokes about sex and stuff. It's just like reference-based humor: There's nothing wrong with making jokes that reference other works, and there's nothing wrong with making jokes about sex. The problem is when there is no real joke, and instead you are supposed to laugh merely because sex was brought up at all, and ha ha we are all still nervous about that.
That's really all this joke is: there's sort of a pun thing about video games and speed runs but it makes so little sense that i think we can all agree that the only reason anyone laughs at it is because: sex. and that is just lazy, when you get down to it.
xkcd sucks gets it right once again, and far more concisely than last comic.
Terry Pratchett wrote:The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.
sourmìlk wrote:Taco wrote:xkcd sucks wrote:...tldr rant...
xkcd sucks gets it right once again, and far more concisely than last comic.
just because a joke is formulaic (think about one thing in terms of another) doesn't mean it can't be SPARTA!!!
sourmìlk wrote:just because a joke is formulaic (think about one thing in terms of another) doesn't mean it can't be funny. See: every funny meme ever.

SirMustapha wrote:sourmìlk wrote:just because a joke is formulaic (think about one thing in terms of another) doesn't mean it can't be funny. See: every funny meme ever.
The problem is when the joke is formulaic AND the formula is boring. In other words:Spoiler:
let me fix that for SPARTA!!
Terry Pratchett wrote:The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.
SirMustapha wrote:sourmìlk wrote:just because a joke is formulaic (think about one thing in terms of another) doesn't mean it can't be funny. See: every funny meme ever.
The problem is when the joke is formulaic AND the formula is boring. In other words:Spoiler:
Return to Individual XKCD Comic Threads
Users browsing this forum: akacat, Angelastic, azule, dreiarmumig, Exodies, fatness, k.bookbinder, lmjb1964, macraw83, Opiboble, spamjam, ttscp, ucim, yappobiscuits and 43 guests