Count up in Increasing Bases
Moderators: jestingrabbit, Moderators General, Prelates
 Quantum Sunshine
 Posts: 43
 Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:58 am UTC
 Location: Missouri
 Contact:
Count up in Increasing Bases
This is basically another weird count up thread, but with a twist.
I start in base 2 and say 1. The next person would increase the base and increase the count (so the next post would be base 3, 2). Since we don't have an infinite amount of characters we'll use base 2 through base 16, resetting each time we reach base 16.*
I'll start:
1, base 2.
*sorry if this is a bit confusing.
I start in base 2 and say 1. The next person would increase the base and increase the count (so the next post would be base 3, 2). Since we don't have an infinite amount of characters we'll use base 2 through base 16, resetting each time we reach base 16.*
I'll start:
1, base 2.
*sorry if this is a bit confusing.
Re: Count up in Increasing Bases
2, base 3
we could go all the way up to base 62 adding letters.
we could go all the way up to base 62 adding letters.
Belial wrote:Listen, what I'm saying is that he committed a felony with a zoo animal.
 Quantum Sunshine
 Posts: 43
 Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:58 am UTC
 Location: Missouri
 Contact:
Re: Count up in Increasing Bases
3, base 4.
Resetting also increases the 'challenge' because the number won't just be one less than the base.
Resetting also increases the 'challenge' because the number won't just be one less than the base.
Re: Count up in Increasing Bases
4, base 5.
So I guess this thread is pretty boring until we get to our base cap. Are we still sticking with only up to base 16? We could go up to base 90 with a normal qwerty keyboard without resorting to unicode.
So I guess this thread is pretty boring until we get to our base cap. Are we still sticking with only up to base 16? We could go up to base 90 with a normal qwerty keyboard without resorting to unicode.
 eggdudeguy
 Posts: 9
 Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 3:24 am UTC
 Contact:
Re: Count up in Increasing Bases
5...
Isn't this just count in Base 16?
Base 256 is accessible with the full range of bits.
Isn't this just count in Base 16?
Base 256 is accessible with the full range of bits.
 LucasBrown
 Posts: 293
 Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 2:57 am UTC
 Location: Poway, CA
Re: Count up in Increasing Bases
6_{7}
It's not just counting in base 16... it's counting by sixteens, first in base 2, then 3, then 4, then 5, ...
It's not just counting in base 16... it's counting by sixteens, first in base 2, then 3, then 4, then 5, ...
 Quantum Sunshine
 Posts: 43
 Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:58 am UTC
 Location: Missouri
 Contact:
Re: Count up in Increasing Bases
8_{9}
It's really up to you guys to decide what you want to do for the base cap, and how to decide the base. Once we decide, I'll modify the first post.
It's really up to you guys to decide what you want to do for the base cap, and how to decide the base. Once we decide, I'll modify the first post.

 Posts: 295
 Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 5:07 am UTC
 Location: New Zealand
Re: Count up in Increasing Bases
1A_{11}

 Posts: 0
 Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:52 am UTC
Re: Count up in Increasing Bases
C_{13}
its gonna get funny with F_{16} > 1 0000_{2} > 200_{3}......
its gonna get funny with F_{16} > 1 0000_{2} > 200_{3}......
 Quantum Sunshine
 Posts: 43
 Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:58 am UTC
 Location: Missouri
 Contact:

 Posts: 295
 Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 5:07 am UTC
 Location: New Zealand
Re: Count up in Increasing Bases
10000_{2}
 Magnanimous
 Madmanananimous
 Posts: 3467
 Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:11 pm UTC
 Location: Land of Hipsters and Rain (LOHAR)

 Posts: 295
 Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 5:07 am UTC
 Location: New Zealand
Re: Count up in Increasing Bases
103_{4}
Last edited by mickyj300x on Fri Sep 17, 2010 9:25 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Count up in Increasing Bases
40_{5}
Last edited by _infina_ on Sat Sep 18, 2010 2:35 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.
Spoiler:

 Posts: 295
 Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 5:07 am UTC
 Location: New Zealand
 Magnanimous
 Madmanananimous
 Posts: 3467
 Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:11 pm UTC
 Location: Land of Hipsters and Rain (LOHAR)

 Posts: 0
 Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:52 am UTC
Re: Count up in Increasing Bases
26_{8} = 22_{10}
 Quantum Sunshine
 Posts: 43
 Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:58 am UTC
 Location: Missouri
 Contact:
Re: Count up in Increasing Bases
MuschMusch wrote:26_{8} = 22_{10}
I'm assuming this is the right count, so:
25_{9}
 LucasBrown
 Posts: 293
 Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 2:57 am UTC
 Location: Poway, CA
 Magnanimous
 Madmanananimous
 Posts: 3467
 Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:11 pm UTC
 Location: Land of Hipsters and Rain (LOHAR)

 Posts: 0
 Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:52 am UTC
Re: Count up in Increasing Bases
21_{13}

 Posts: 0
 Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:52 am UTC
Re: Count up in Increasing Bases
1E_{15}
 LucasBrown
 Posts: 293
 Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 2:57 am UTC
 Location: Poway, CA
Re: Count up in Increasing Bases
Did this die because people were confused by the last posts?
Aren't the last two supposed to be:
14, base 15
1E, base 16
and then:
11111, base 2
Aren't the last two supposed to be:
14, base 15
1E, base 16
and then:
11111, base 2
“Never underestimate the power of dreams and the influence of the human spirit. We are all the same in this notion: The potential for greatness lives within each of us.” (Wilma Rudolph)

 Posts: 0
 Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:52 am UTC
Re: Count up in Increasing Bases
Necro!
Supposed to be:
1E base 15
1D base 16
11111 base 2
And now (actual):
1012 base 3
Creep on going.
Supposed to be:
1E base 15
1D base 16
11111 base 2
And now (actual):
1012 base 3
Creep on going.
Re: Count up in Increasing Bases
Whoops, yes, I've no idea how I got that.
Anyway:
201_{4}
Anyway:
201_{4}
“Never underestimate the power of dreams and the influence of the human spirit. We are all the same in this notion: The potential for greatness lives within each of us.” (Wilma Rudolph)

 Posts: 0
 Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:52 am UTC
Re: Count up in Increasing Bases
114_{5}
 NecklaceOfShadow
 Posts: 775
 Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 7:40 pm UTC
 Location: In the alchemical aether
 Contact:
Re: Count up in Increasing Bases
55_{6}
Significantly less weird than I used to be. Still pretty weird.
οὗτός ἐστιν Ἀγαμέμνων, ἐμὸς
πόσις, νεκρὸς δὲ τῆσδε δεξιᾶς χερός
ἔργον δικαίας τέκτονος. τάδ’ ὧδ’ ἔχει.
οὗτός ἐστιν Ἀγαμέμνων, ἐμὸς
πόσις, νεκρὸς δὲ τῆσδε δεξιᾶς χερός
ἔργον δικαίας τέκτονος. τάδ’ ὧδ’ ἔχει.

 Posts: 0
 Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:52 am UTC
 Quantum Sunshine
 Posts: 43
 Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:58 am UTC
 Location: Missouri
 Contact:

 Posts: 0
 Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:52 am UTC
 cjmcjmcjmcjm
 Posts: 1158
 Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:15 am UTC
 Location: Anywhere the internet is strong
Re: Count up in Increasing Bases
39_{10}
frezik wrote:Antiphotons move at the speed of dark
DemonDeluxe wrote:Paying to have laws written that allow you to do what you want, is a lot cheaper than paying off the judge every time you want to get away with something shady.

 Posts: 0
 Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:52 am UTC
Re: Count up in Increasing Bases
37_{11}
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ucim and 15 guests