House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

A slow, analog alternative to the internet

Moderators: SecondTalon, Prelates, Moderators General

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby Jesse » Fri May 14, 2010 10:57 pm UTC

Only Revolutions isn't House of Leaves, it's still incredibly written and coded and played with, but it's an epic poem and if you're into that kind of stuff it will entirely blow you away. But if you go in expecting to read House of Leaves again then there's no point.
User avatar
Jesse
Vocal Terrorist
 
Posts: 8614
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 6:33 pm UTC
Location: Blackpool, England.

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby Sir-Taco » Mon May 17, 2010 2:53 am UTC

After finally some of my friends finished it, we agreed that its probably the only book that's just weird and harmless until you finish it, then you just don't go down dark hallways for a while. I really hope he releases something like House again, Only Rev. was good, but I want more Truant/Z/Navidson!
The world is a cold and dark place, so start fire.
User avatar
Sir-Taco
 
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 2:39 pm UTC
Location: California

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby Jesse » Mon May 17, 2010 7:28 pm UTC

You will never, ever get that. And it pleases me.
User avatar
Jesse
Vocal Terrorist
 
Posts: 8614
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 6:33 pm UTC
Location: Blackpool, England.

Re: House of Leaves

Postby Midnight » Wed May 19, 2010 6:48 pm UTC

oracle989 wrote:I've gotten around to starting into House of Leaves, but the style of the book has prompted me to ask you fine people a question about it. Do you think it would be better to read it straight through, page by page, or to read the manuscript and its footnotes first, then go back for Truant's story?

Also, has anyone read Only Revolutions? If so, how is that?



it's a book. it's meant to be read straight through, page by page. everything on each page, in sequence. it all hangs together better that way.
uhhhh fuck.
User avatar
Midnight
 
Posts: 2172
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 3:53 am UTC
Location: Twixt hither and thither. Ergo, Jupiter.

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby Rowadanr » Wed Jun 30, 2010 10:59 pm UTC

I just finished this... And as I noticed from the end of my last session of reading it, that book is an f'ing state of mind. I find it quite hard to describe how I feel after finally closing it. I wouldn't describe the book as horror at all, even if the house is intensely creepy, it's just... It. An experience. When I closed the book and went to make tea, everything in my house looked somehow different. I've been paying more attention even than I usually do to relative scale and the exact shape of things, the way they're placed relative to me. "Things". "Placed". For the first time since I reinvented myself nouns have seemed to have real meaning, as opposed to just convenience labels. Things seem to be things. I've tried meshing this sharpness with my 'usual' worldveiw and found an interesting contrast, which tells me more about the two concepts than they do on their own.
My mood after putting it down is... clear. Sharp. something like contentment spliced with focus. Happy, but not in any way as messy as my normal ecstatic state. There's so much to think about couched inside those pages.

Interesing... but I'm drifting.

I generally recommend this book to anyone, especially other self-styled philosophers. It's both beautiful in itself and a useful seed for something greater.
The first question I ask myself when something doesn't seem to be beautiful is why do I think it's not beautiful. And very shortly you discover that there is no reason.
- John Cage
User avatar
Rowadanr
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 11:34 am UTC
Location: Living in my solar dome on a platform in... somerset.

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby vaguelyhumanoid » Thu Jul 01, 2010 2:52 am UTC

I'm probably going to reread it this summer, might want to snag a copy of Introducing Semiotics while I'm at it, for reading comprehension. I saw the house as being sort of a psychoanalytic take on the Norse/Celtic/Hungarian/Vedic/probably a bunch of other cultures as well "world tree" myth that reflects the inner, as opposed to the outer, universe of everyone in it, sort of a "collective unconscious" if you will.
I had a bunch of other theories, but I haven't read them in so long that I kind of forgot them...
I love how easy it is to create blue and red text on these forums... House of Leaves was the first thing it made me think of, too.
Spoiler:
tesseraktik wrote: of course you need to gornax your frifftop to a proper taibou (which, as the construction of this tempered tutatu suggests, consists of two bed.pans joined by a haiku), or else angry zubat are going to flork off your penis.'
vaguelyhumanoid
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 4:27 am UTC

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby Woopate » Sat Jul 03, 2010 2:51 pm UTC

Mmmm. This sounds like a gorgeous book for me to pick up for these late night shifts at my closed mall, with all of it's dark dusty twisting service basement coorridors, many of which are sealed up resulting in bizarre things like staircases to nowhere and patches of drywall exactly the size of a door, with no possible route to what's on the other side. This book sounds like it'll be a very delicious read for work.
Image
User avatar
Woopate
Scrapple
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 10:34 am UTC

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby vaguelyhumanoid » Sat Jul 03, 2010 8:42 pm UTC

You just made me envy your job.
Spoiler:
tesseraktik wrote: of course you need to gornax your frifftop to a proper taibou (which, as the construction of this tempered tutatu suggests, consists of two bed.pans joined by a haiku), or else angry zubat are going to flork off your penis.'
vaguelyhumanoid
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 4:27 am UTC

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby Woopate » Sun Jul 04, 2010 4:52 am UTC

I know. One day I'm gonna bring a crowbar and open up some of the trap doors and take a look around.
Image
User avatar
Woopate
Scrapple
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 10:34 am UTC

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby Ivor Zozz » Tue Jul 06, 2010 12:07 am UTC

One of my favorite books. I haven't read anything else quite like it.
The Classical I call the healthy, the Romantic the sick. - Goethe
User avatar
Ivor Zozz
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 7:35 pm UTC

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby Bassoon » Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:03 am UTC

I'm rereading it a second time, and I've already picked up on some things that I missed last time. This is so exciting!
Bassoon
 
Posts: 472
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:58 pm UTC
Location: Wisconsin

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby vaguelyhumanoid » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:33 am UTC

I'm rereading it for the first time, and this time really geeking out with all the linguistics/semiotics.
It's fun1.


FOOTNOTES
1. Though it does make me cautious of my very house, and drive me closer to madness.
Spoiler:
tesseraktik wrote: of course you need to gornax your frifftop to a proper taibou (which, as the construction of this tempered tutatu suggests, consists of two bed.pans joined by a haiku), or else angry zubat are going to flork off your penis.'
vaguelyhumanoid
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 4:27 am UTC

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby Asleep or Wrong » Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:58 pm UTC

I got it a few weeks ago but I want to read everything else ever written as introductory material before it. I know people coming in with less than me still get a lot out of it but I can't shake the ridiculous idea. It's like raising a child or something.

edit: can anyone give a shorter list of recommened reading/watching/experiencing?
Asleep or Wrong
 
Posts: 78
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 10:34 am UTC
Location: sirmio

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby Jesse » Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:32 am UTC

Read Labyrinths by Borges. It's a great collection of short stories and one of the main inspirations for House of Leaves.
User avatar
Jesse
Vocal Terrorist
 
Posts: 8614
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 6:33 pm UTC
Location: Blackpool, England.

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby ian » Mon Aug 09, 2010 4:40 am UTC

I just started reading this, 60 pages odd in. It is night time here (or was, now early morning). My bedroom is at the end of a dark narrow hallway with no windows and doors at each end. FUCK EVERYTHING.
User avatar
ian
 
Posts: 703
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 3:55 pm UTC
Location: Sealand

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby vaguelyhumanoid » Fri Aug 13, 2010 6:39 am UTC

ian wrote:FUCK EVERYTHING.


That reminded me of Dennis Hopper in Blue Velvet.

Also, when the minotaur of typography comes to devour all your children, know that it has been House: Blue Text.
Spoiler:
tesseraktik wrote: of course you need to gornax your frifftop to a proper taibou (which, as the construction of this tempered tutatu suggests, consists of two bed.pans joined by a haiku), or else angry zubat are going to flork off your penis.'
vaguelyhumanoid
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 4:27 am UTC

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby Woopate » Sat Aug 14, 2010 10:58 am UTC

Found myself a copy of the book (took some bookhunting fu, apparently not that easy to find up here in Calgary, Alberta.). I liked it instantly when I opened it and the front page was a collage that included a sheet of paper listing helicopter signal shapes that I'd been trained in years before. Then I turn a few more pages and am confronted by "This is not for you." Which immediately made me laugh out loud. I'd deliberately read what little of this thread I did very quickly and vaguely, so that I understood the book to be about a house that suffer from TARDIS syndrome and little else. When I discovered it was a review of a non-existant movie written by a blind dead guy and edited by some dude who found it, and then further edited by "the Editors", I was hooked. Then I realized I had just read a 4-page long footnote without realizing it, and laughed out loud again. Thus far: This book I like.
Image
User avatar
Woopate
Scrapple
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 10:34 am UTC

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby clpm » Thu Oct 14, 2010 9:26 pm UTC

Just finished it. There are a couple of things that I didn't quite get and couldn't find any info online:

Spoiler:
One, the Pelican Poems were written in 1988 (and 1990), when Johnny was 16 or so. They're fairly well written, if a bit confusing/ed. House of Leaves seems to have been edited around 1998. So how come, in the early footnotes, Johnny's vocabulary seems smaller and he still makes very basic mistakes such as writing "should of" instead of "should have"? Did I miss something?

Two, the word "House" isn't in blue in the Credits (p. 708). After seeing it colored for the entire book, this really creeped me out. :) Is this just an oversight, or does it have some meaning?
clpm
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:19 pm UTC

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby Jesse » Fri Oct 15, 2010 12:55 am UTC

Mark Z. Danielewski has claimed that there are no mistakes in the book. If it is there, it's there for a reason.
User avatar
Jesse
Vocal Terrorist
 
Posts: 8614
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 6:33 pm UTC
Location: Blackpool, England.

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby djkjr » Sun Oct 17, 2010 2:08 pm UTC

This is the only book that has ever sent shivers down my spine. The only one that scared me to the point where I had to close it. The only one that made me turn the lights on.

I've read the beginning a hand full of times, but only the entire thing once. I think I was more focused on finishing it and being able to say that I completed it than actually enjoying it from front to back. (side to side, upside down, this way and that) House is truly an undertaking that I'm glad I managed. I can't wait to go back to it though and read it more slowly.

Honestly, I can't even think of what to say about it anymore. There was just so much to it that trying to place my finger on a moment or an event is dizzying.

Has anyone else heard that the book was originally an alternate reality game? That it began on a website and the pieces of it were given out slowly. The footnotes in the book were references to actual things that, if you were to go and take the time to find them, meant something pertinent to the story.

There are hidden messages in the book. The long list of names. There's a message there. I got really into the research of the book for a little while, but again just became so dizzy by it that it was like trying to look at the entire world for what it was. Too many cogs...

Anyway else have this difficulty or experience these things? Or know about the book at the same capacity that I do, if not more?
War is Peace.
Freedom is Slavery.
Ignorance is Strength.
User avatar
djkjr
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:21 pm UTC
Location: All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby GhostWolfe » Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:45 am UTC

I am fail at being intellectual. This book really disappointed me. I wanted to be scared, I tried to be scared, but I found the book so boring that it was such an effort to get through. Now I am sad, cause I think I'm too dumb to appreciate it.

But I think that the book is about obsession. I've been watching this thread on and off and it gets inside people. Navidson was obsessed with the house, the narrator was obsessed with the film of the house, and the readers become obsessed with the essay of the film.

/angell
Linguistic Anarchist
Hawknc: ANGELL IS SERIOUS BUSINESS :-[
lesliesage: Animals dunked in crude oil: sad. Animals dunked in boiling oil: tasty.
Belial: I was in your mom's room all night committing to a series of extended military actions.
User avatar
GhostWolfe
Broken wings and scattered feathers
 
Posts: 3892
Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 11:56 am UTC
Location: Brisbane, Aust

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby djkjr » Mon Oct 18, 2010 2:47 pm UTC

GhostWolfe wrote:...and the readers become obsessed with the essay of the film.

I like that, a lot. I've never found anyone who has read it who hasn't obsessed with it or otherwise just put it aside to forget about it. There doesn't seem to be much middle ground. Now I really want to read it again! lol

"This is not for you."
War is Peace.
Freedom is Slavery.
Ignorance is Strength.
User avatar
djkjr
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:21 pm UTC
Location: All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby Jave D » Thu Oct 21, 2010 7:22 am UTC

I just finished reading. Here's some thoughts I'll spoilerize just in case.

Spoiler:
Zampano's blindness and the consuming blackness of the house. Was he born blind, or did he become that way? For that matter, much like Perafina's (and Johnny's) declining states of mental health. The horror of every day, your mind and health deteriorating while you are helpless to stop it. Dwindling sanity, dwindling ability to self control, dwindling ability to cease drugs or halt an obsession...


Spoiler:
House of Leaves. A book houses leafs of paper. This is a book whose title is a metaphor for a book. Much like "The Bible," whose name you imagine carries some secret, hidden One Meaning - until you remember it just means 'book.'


I like it, but my mind remains unblown. I've got more infinite darks between the covers of my own house to cope with.
I work all night, I work all day, to pay the bills I have to pay
Ain't it sad?
And still there never seems to be a single penny left for me
That's too bad.
User avatar
Jave D
chavey-dee
 
Posts: 1003
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 4:41 pm UTC

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby djkjr » Thu Oct 21, 2010 1:26 pm UTC

Jave D wrote:I just finished reading. Here's some thoughts I'll spoilerize just in case.

Spoiler:
Zampano's blindness and the consuming blackness of the house. Was he born blind, or did he become that way? For that matter, much like Perafina's (and Johnny's) declining states of mental health. The horror of every day, your mind and health deteriorating while you are helpless to stop it. Dwindling sanity, dwindling ability to self control, dwindling ability to cease drugs or halt an obsession...

Spoiler:
It is presumed that he was not born blind. Most especially evident to that claim is the fact that he wrote "The Navidson Record" after having watched the footage. How could he have written that if he was blind? Zampano went into great detail about the footage in his records. I think it's safe to assume he had his sight. Perhaps the knowledge of the House blinded him?


Jave D wrote:
Spoiler:
House of Leaves. A book houses leafs of paper. This is a book whose title is a metaphor for a book. Much like "The Bible," whose name you imagine carries some secret, hidden One Meaning - until you remember it just means 'book.'



I like it, but my mind remains unblown. I've got more infinite darks between the covers of my own house to cope with.

What you're saying here is basicly the purpose of the book, in a way. The book is a puzzle. The only difference with this puzzle compared to conventional ones is that most people will feel a different way about it. I really enjoyed the book, perhaps just because it was so daringly different. It's the only book I know of that too the medium of literature and transformed it into something new and exciting. The story there, there's just so much history in it. A lot of that history, is true. (at one capacity or another)
War is Peace.
Freedom is Slavery.
Ignorance is Strength.
User avatar
djkjr
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:21 pm UTC
Location: All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby Coyote_Truant » Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:09 pm UTC

I first read HoL many years ago when it was first released. This summer, mostly on a whim, I picked it up again. The experience of rereading the book was both surreal and wonderful - I felt almost as if I had never read it at all, that's how little I remembered (aside from the mood.)

I shamelessly revive this old topic, as discussion is something I want. This book eats away at you as eagerly as the wyrms eat away at the roots of Yggrdrasil.

Firstly, P/Z/J?
Spoiler:
There was a lot of interesting discussion regarding the actual writer of the book. It's been mentioned earlier in this thread that Johnny may not exist. While I don't have a copy of HoL or Whalestoe Letters with me to cite the sources for such, I do find the notion of the Pekinese narrative supporting this interesting.

On the HoL forums they have discussed the idea of Johnny as an invention of Zampano and Pelafina - a way for them to cover up an affair or something similar. This notion is supported, in a sense, by the choice of using the Courier font for Johnny's writing, the encoded messages to Zampano, and the overall use of the house as a metaphor for the attempts of the male to understand the female.

Ideas? Discussion?


Secondly, the Minotaur:
Spoiler:
Although there is ample discussion about Johnny/Zampano as Minotaur/Minos respectively I've found discussion regarding the beast as corporeal (as the claw marks suggest) strictly lacking. Have any of you considered that take on it?


I hope this begins some renewed discussion.

Slán leat!
Coyote_Truant
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 12:54 pm UTC

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby djkjr » Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:55 pm UTC

@ Coyote_Truant :
Spoiler:
I've never considered the idea of the house to be a metaphor of men understanding women. I really want to go back and read it again with that in mind and see how I feel about it. It's in storage right now, I'll be getting it out in about 20 days and I hope that it'll shed an interesting perspective on my perception of the book.
I also had never considered that Truant (Hey! That's you! lol) may have never existed. There seems to be such a parallel to him and the Navidson Record that I guess I just took it for what it was. I suppose though that is not the intention of the entire book and I wouldn't be surprised to learn that I was tricked into believing something that wasn't true. Mr. Danielewski is a tricky SOB.
War is Peace.
Freedom is Slavery.
Ignorance is Strength.
User avatar
djkjr
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:21 pm UTC
Location: All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby dbsmith » Thu Dec 23, 2010 8:14 am UTC

Bought it, will read it this summer.
User avatar
dbsmith
 
Posts: 229
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 3:52 am UTC

Re: House of Leaves

Postby minkis » Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:21 pm UTC

Midnight wrote:
oracle989 wrote:I've gotten around to starting into House of Leaves, but the style of the book has prompted me to ask you fine people a question about it. Do you think it would be better to read it straight through, page by page, or to read the manuscript and its footnotes first, then go back for Truant's story?

Also, has anyone read Only Revolutions? If so, how is that?



it's a book. it's meant to be read straight through, page by page. everything on each page, in sequence. it all hangs together better that way.

In my opinion, you should read it through, and as you come onto footnotes, read them.
User avatar
minkis
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 3:57 pm UTC
Location: Fort Bragg, NC

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby Izawwlgood » Fri Jan 07, 2011 7:38 am UTC

I recently ordered a copy of this book from amazon with the hopes of rereading it.

When it arrived, I was overjoyed to discover it was in fact a used copy (as I prefer most books to be), the spine showing mild signs of wear, and the corners a bit blunted. I lifted the book and rifled through it, and a couple post-it's buried within the pages caught my eye, so I flicked back and examined them.

Some were mine. I remember writing them and slapping them in the second time I read through, about 4 years ago. There were more, a dozen or so, and more margin notes, notes on my notes, and a few crossed out and rewritten by a strangers hand. I was pleased to see people had added to the seal I had doodled near the front, expanding and elaborating on the vain attempt to keep the Bad at bay.

And most frightening of all, written in deep blue in the back cover, a url linking to a .gif. I don't have the courage to see what it's to.

Spoiler:
Just kidding. I did reorder the book, was dismayed to get a shiny new copy. I want my old copy, with the post-it's and liner notes from various peoples. Lost during college. Oh well. Totally think about this happening every time I pick up someone else's copy though.
How many are the enemy, but where are they? Within, without, never ceases the fight.
User avatar
Izawwlgood
WINNING
 
Posts: 16835
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 3:55 pm UTC
Location: There may be lovelier lovelies...

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby pseudoidiot » Fri Jan 07, 2011 3:14 pm UTC

Izawwlgood wrote:I recently ordered a copy of this book from amazon with the hopes of rereading it.

When it arrived, I was overjoyed to discover it was in fact a used copy (as I prefer most books to be), the spine showing mild signs of wear, and the corners a bit blunted. I lifted the book and rifled through it, and a couple post-it's buried within the pages caught my eye, so I flicked back and examined them.

Some were mine. I remember writing them and slapping them in the second time I read through, about 4 years ago. There were more, a dozen or so, and more margin notes, notes on my notes, and a few crossed out and rewritten by a strangers hand. I was pleased to see people had added to the seal I had doodled near the front, expanding and elaborating on the vain attempt to keep the Bad at bay.

And most frightening of all, written in deep blue in the back cover, a url linking to a .gif. I don't have the courage to see what it's to.

Spoiler:
Just kidding. I did reorder the book, was dismayed to get a shiny new copy. I want my old copy, with the post-it's and liner notes from various peoples. Lost during college. Oh well. Totally think about this happening every time I pick up someone else's copy though.
Spoiler:
Goddammit, I was really hoping for a gif URL under that spoiler.
Derailed : Gaming Outside the Box.
SecondTalon wrote:*swoons* I love you, all powerful pseudoidiot!
ShootTheChicken wrote:I can't stop thinking about pseudoidiot's penis.
User avatar
pseudoidiot
Sexy Beard Man
 
Posts: 4900
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:30 pm UTC
Location: Kansas City

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby McCaber » Wed Jan 12, 2011 4:43 am UTC

My girlfriend just received this book in the mail. It was ordered via an online seller under her name, only she has no account with that store and was not charged for it.

If any book deserves that method of acquiring it, it's House of Leaves.
Spoiler:
hyperion wrote:
Hawknc wrote:Crap, that image is going to get a lot of use around here.

That's what SHE said!

She blinded me with Science!
User avatar
McCaber
 
Posts: 474
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 6:35 am UTC
Location: Coyote

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby Jorpho » Mon Jan 17, 2011 3:29 am UTC

I'm about halfway through this at the moment, at the point where it starts getting kind of weird, though casual flipping reveals it's not yet at the point where it starts getting really weird.

I'm trying to avoid spoilers so I haven't looked over this thread yet, but I just felt compelled to state that I kind of hope it turns out that Truant is some ugly loser who has but hardly known the touch of a woman, and who draws like Napoleon Dynamite. :) (Heck, I think it might be an entertaining Youtube project to take clips from Napoleon Dynamite and overdub them with a dramatic reading of some of Truant's monologuing.)
User avatar
Jorpho
 
Posts: 5622
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:31 am UTC
Location: Canada

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby Jorpho » Mon Feb 21, 2011 3:36 am UTC

Welp, all finished. Mostly. Still got the Letters to go through. (I probably should have skipped the spoilers for those, but I doubt I would have caught "Who have you lost, dear Zampano?" or whatever it is on my own.)

If nothing else, I've got to say that it's an impressive work, I doubt it was any kind of small effort to produce it, and it seems unlikely that I'll come across something like it ever again.

If anything, it reminds me of the process of writing in itself. It brought back memories of writing my thesis and of writing English and Humanities papers long, long ago - the desperate, obsessive hammering through sources and compiling of references, trying each day to drive closer and closer to some kind of deeper meaning. The idea of the book as a "satire of academic criticism" makes sense to me that way.

One thing I'm a little surprised no one has commented on: there's this one bit where Tom is unambiguously referred to as me. ZOMG Tom is Zampano! Or not.

If a movie is ever made, it shall probably have to be released with an audio track and some sort of regular book alongside it, all meant to be used simultaneously.
User avatar
Jorpho
 
Posts: 5622
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:31 am UTC
Location: Canada

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby Jorpho » Tue Mar 08, 2011 5:41 am UTC

Huh. Guess I missed the boat on this one.

I just wanted to add that this is vaguely amusing, if you've read the book:
http://www.freewebs.com/torchingleaves/Leaves01.htm
User avatar
Jorpho
 
Posts: 5622
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:31 am UTC
Location: Canada

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby no-genius » Wed Mar 09, 2011 11:25 pm UTC

Jorpho wrote:One thing I'm a little surprised no one has commented on: there's this one bit where Tom is unambiguously referred to as me. ZOMG Tom is Zampano! Or not.

I noticed, but it just makes it even more confusing really. I was thinking that maybe when
Spoiler:
Tom got nomm-ed by the house, he'd somehow ended up in a different universe, where TNR is fictional, and maybe became Zampano? Doesn't really make much sense.
I don't sing, I just shout. All. On. One. Note.
Official ironmen you are free, champions officially

The Mighty Thesaurus wrote:Why? It does nothing to address dance music's core problem: the fact that it sucks.
User avatar
no-genius
Seemed like a good idea at the time
 
Posts: 4208
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 6:32 pm UTC
Location: empty set \0

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby lu6cifer » Fri Jun 17, 2011 11:58 pm UTC

Actually, I think the character of Zampano is based on

Spoiler:
Jorge Luis Borges, an Argentinian author who also wrote about labyrinths and dreams and things within things and whatnot. Plus the fact that Borges apparently loved a woman named Beatriz (Like Zampano), and Borges was also nearing blindness in his old age, and Zampano at some point says he's been blind for the last two decades. Borges was also a reclusive kind of guy. Finally, if Zampano "is" Borges, then it would totally make sense that Zampano would write a film review of a film that does not exist at all, because that's exactly the sort of thing Borges did.
lu6cifer wrote:"Derive" in place of "differentiate" is even worse.

doogly wrote:I'm partial to "throw some d's on that bitch."
User avatar
lu6cifer
 
Posts: 230
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:03 am UTC
Location: That state with the all-important stone

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby no-genius » Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:18 pm UTC

Did I post in here about how the description of how the house is now
Spoiler:
(boarded up and with a fence around it) is pretty much exactly what the whalestoe(whose tale?) institute looks like when Johnny goes to visit it
I don't sing, I just shout. All. On. One. Note.
Official ironmen you are free, champions officially

The Mighty Thesaurus wrote:Why? It does nothing to address dance music's core problem: the fact that it sucks.
User avatar
no-genius
Seemed like a good idea at the time
 
Posts: 4208
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 6:32 pm UTC
Location: empty set \0

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby Proginoskes » Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:54 am UTC

Midnight wrote:that has a tendency to of will, ornithopters race klaxons' lightning, infinite kamikaze evermore--this heinous inscrutable style.


Let's take the first letters of each of those words ...

"that to work like this"

***

Anywho ...

I guess I wasn't as impressed by the book as everyone else on the planet. Having read Lovecraft and The Illuminatus! Trilogy beforehand probably spoiled it for me.
User avatar
Proginoskes
 
Posts: 309
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 7:07 am UTC
Location: Sitting Down

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby Jesse » Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:55 pm UTC

Not really, considering I studied Lovecraft and read Illuminatus! and it just allowed me to enjoy this more. It's fine if you didn't 'get it' or whatever, but I doubt your prior knowledge of those works was the cause.
User avatar
Jesse
Vocal Terrorist
 
Posts: 8614
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 6:33 pm UTC
Location: Blackpool, England.

Re: House of omgwhyamIturningmybook Leaves.

Postby Proginoskes » Thu Dec 22, 2011 9:27 am UTC

Jesse wrote:Not really, considering I studied Lovecraft and read Illuminatus! and it just allowed me to enjoy this more. It's fine if you didn't 'get it' or whatever, but I doubt your prior knowledge of those works was the cause.


It wasn't so much the knowledge, but just having read some mindfucking books beforehand probably deadened some of the shocks that other people got.
User avatar
Proginoskes
 
Posts: 309
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 7:07 am UTC
Location: Sitting Down

Previous

Return to Books

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: LaserGuy and 0 guests