Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates
Kewangji wrote:Someone told me I need to stop being so arrogant. Like I'd care about their plebeian opinions.
Traisenau wrote:Hell, you just try learning Japanese, there are not 1, not 2, but 3 different alphabets(and a 4th, but it is just the english spellings of the sounds of the characters) all of which can be used in one sentence. They have a different grammer form for every single goddamn type of sentence that you could think of, different form for liking a book and like reading a book, etc. And the pronounciations can be a bitch too, because extending a sound sounds the same as just adding a new character... but they sound the same... shii (shi i) is different from shii (shi -)
a neutral gray wrote:Does creating a language count as studying one?
ohtobeagiant wrote:Traisenau wrote:Hell, you just try learning Japanese, there are not 1, not 2, but 3 different alphabets(and a 4th, but it is just the english spellings of the sounds of the characters) all of which can be used in one sentence. They have a different grammer form for every single goddamn type of sentence that you could think of, different form for liking a book and like reading a book, etc. And the pronounciations can be a bitch too, because extending a sound sounds the same as just adding a new character... but they sound the same... shii (shi i) is different from shii (shi -)
Oh, don't be silly. Japanese isn't that crazy. Two of the alphabets (technically syllabaries) are totally phonetic, so it cuts down a lot on the ideographs, which are harder to learn because there are more of them.
A lot of the grammar is way less complex than other languages (for example, there aren't grammatical genders or singular forms). Even the plain and polite forms are pretty easy to handle. The worst grammatical part is probably the use of entirely different words for humble, respect, and plain verbs, but it's worth it for the rest of the language being awesome.
It's funny, because I've heard that Japanese grammar is very difficult and that it's very simple; I've come to the conclusion that it's very logical.
As for liking and reading a book, that difference is easy to understand when you think of liking a book in terms of saying the book is something that is liked.
As for pronunciation, you don't have to worry about tones or even sounds that are difficult to pronounce.
Anyway, sorry that was so long.
To summarize: Japanese isn't that bad.
Monika wrote:Gymnasium = years 10 to 12?
Pfhorrest wrote:As someone who is not easily offended, I don't really mind anything in this conversation.
ohtobeagiant wrote:Traisenau wrote:They have a different grammer form for every single goddamn type of sentence that you could think of, different form for liking a book and like reading a book, etc.
As for liking and reading a book, that difference is easy to understand when you think of liking a book in terms of saying the book is something that is liked.
Iulus Cofield wrote: Infamously /ɾ/ and especially it's palatized variant (I still can't say りゃ, りゅ, or りょ), and as mentioned [ts] and contrastive vowel length.
Return to Language/Linguistics
Users browsing this forum: nzjpluluhco, Slageammalymn and 2 guests