Count up in base 4 (using xkcd)

[Thesh]

Inspired by the combinations of xkcd thread, using xkcd as the digits, count up; x = 0, k = 1, c = 2, d = 3

x

[ostrichguy]

k

[Max2009]

c

This one makes more sense.

[cjdrum]

I was going to be angry, but meh.
D

[ostrichguy]

KX

[cjdrum]

Taking that as XX:
XK

Taking that as KX:
KK

[You, sir, name?]

kc

[cjdrum]

Assuming XC:
XD (yes, I got it!)

Assuming KC (which is wrong):
KD

[Mazuku]

cx

[You, sir, name?]

Assuming XC:
XD (yes, I got it!)

Assuming KC (which is wrong):
KD

Huh? OP defines X = 0, so XC = 0 * 4 + 2 = C

[Mazuku]

cc = 22₄ = 10₁₀

[You, sir, name?]

cd (23₄)

[cjdrum]

Something is wrong with me. I am wrong. I am wrong.

DX

[Mazuku]

dk

[You, sir, name?]

dc

[cjdrum]

DD:

[Mazuku]

kxx

[cjdrum]

KXK

[Mazuku]

kxc

[You, sir, name?]

kxd

[Mazuku]

kkx

[You, sir, name?]

kkk

[Mazuku]

kkc

[cjdrum]

kkc

[You, sir, name?]

kkd (kcx if parent notices his double post and edits)

[cjdrum]

kcx

[You, sir, name?]

kck

[Mazuku]

kcc = 122₄ = 26₁₀

x=0 k=1 c=2 d=3

[cjdrum]

KCD

[You, sir, name?]

(X)KCD

KDX

[Mazuku]

kdc
(I think we lost count somewhere so I hope this gets things back on track)

(As a tip for the future, if we lose count, just check the post count and use that as a reference)

[You, sir, name?]

kdc
(I think we lost count somewhere so I hope this gets things back on track)

(As a tip for the future, if we lose count, just check the post count and use that as a reference)

We started at 0, there have been a couple of non-count posts, and at least one duplicate entry. So it's not going to match perfectly.

kdd

[cjdrum]

CXX

And, wow, I totally got to say XKCD and missed it...

[Mazuku]

cxk

[Thesh]

cxc

[cjdrum]

CXD

[Mazuku]

ckx

[You, sir, name?]

ckk

[Mazuku]

ckc

[You, sir, name?]

ckd