Moderators: Moderators General, Magistrates, Prelates
General_Norris wrote:I notice a lack of counter-arguments and a lot of fisting.
General_Norris wrote:I notice a lack of counter-arguments and a lot of fisting.
SexyTalon wrote:*swoons* I love you, all powerful pseudoidiot!
ShootTheChicken wrote:I can't stop thinking about pseudoidiot's penis.
General_Norris wrote:I notice a lack of counter-arguments and a lot of fisting.
The EGE wrote:Mumpy wrote:And to this day, librarians revile Oregonaut as the Antichrist.
False! We sacrifice our card catalogues to him in the name of Job Security!
Oregonaut wrote:They need to blend in with the ship. Every ship is equipped with a forest. Every. Single. One.
I've never understood why they made us wear polyester that melts when so much as blowdryered.
Great things are done when Men & Mountains meet,
This is not Done by Jostling in the Street.
AFI 36-2903 wrote:1.3.2. Members will not:
1.3.2.1. Stand or walk with hands in pockets of any uniform combination, other than to insert or
remove items.
1.3.2.2. Walk in uniform while using cell phones, radios, hands-free headsets unless required in
the performance of official duties using a government issued device.
1.3.2.3. Smoke/use smokeless tobaccos, drink, or eat while walking in uniform.
General_Norris wrote:I notice a lack of counter-arguments and a lot of fisting.
Gears wrote:We (Marines) still train to fight with bayonets. I would love to get to use one.
Gears wrote:The reason most soldiers don't go is because they are afraid of getting kicked out of the military.
TheKrikkitWars wrote:I'd love to know the reasoning for finally retiring the Iowa class ships, and indeed for abandoning naval gunfire support in general, When it was considered preferable to Missiles/Bombs for supporting amphibious landings?
Roosevelt wrote:I wrote:Does Space Teddy Roosevelt wrestle Space Bears and fight the Space Spanish-American War with his band of Space-volunteers the Space Rough Riders?
Yes.
Gears wrote:We (Marines) still train to fight with bayonets. I would love to get to use one. We don't charge because it's awkward in an urban environment (85 pound combat load) and flaks provide limited ability to move.
Great things are done when Men & Mountains meet,
This is not Done by Jostling in the Street.
I don't think I can explain this to a civilian without coming off as barbaric.Midnight wrote:See, that shit freaks me out a lil' bit.
General_Norris wrote:I notice a lack of counter-arguments and a lot of fisting.
Gears wrote:The wanting to get kicked out thing comes with not having an all-volunteer force. In the American military, we're all here by choice.
Gears wrote:Midnight wrote:On bayonets: Those are cool stories, but perhaps Brits carry less ammo than we do? At a bare minimum you carry 7 mags. It's a brave thing to do, but I'm not doing it until I'm completely out of ammunition. It's just an outdated tactic.
Great things are done when Men & Mountains meet,
This is not Done by Jostling in the Street.
Red Hal wrote:If you can't tick all the boxes then you don't have privilege! Privilege; it's a multiple-input AND gate!
General_Norris wrote:I notice a lack of counter-arguments and a lot of fisting.
Gears wrote:I don't understand why a conscientious objector would join the military. I don't hate them. Every job in the military supports killing in one way or another so I'm not sure why they would join.
You, sir, name? wrote:Just make sure to consistently whack it in the ass, as that's one end it does not shoot fire out of. Be careless with the flame-magic and it may just shoot fire out both ends.
General_Norris wrote:I notice a lack of counter-arguments and a lot of fisting.
Gears wrote:I don't understand why a conscientious objector would join the military. I don't hate them. Every job in the military supports killing in one way or another so I'm not sure why they would join.
Vaniver wrote:Harvard is a hedge fund that runs the most prestigious dating agency in the world, and incidentally employs famous scientists to do research.
afuzzyduck wrote:ITS MEANT TO BE FLUTTERSHY BUT I JUST SEE AAERIELE! CURSE YOU FORA!
General_Norris wrote:I notice a lack of counter-arguments and a lot of fisting.
WibblyWobbly wrote:Analogies fucking suck, and a lot of these suck more than most. "Well, it's clearly like a man who's teaching a stock broker to fish, but his fishing net is actually made out of Gary Busey, so the stock broker says 'That's not cricket!'"
Midnight wrote:Also also, I still haven't technically registered for selective service--I'm not gonna get arrested for something so stupid, right? I mean, I know I should do it at some point, I just forget.
TheKrikkitWars wrote:I'd also love to know why it is that US forces last used a bayonet charge in 1950, yet UK forces continue to use them?
Gears wrote:I thought we were talking about the ones that do join the military. I haven't met any, but I'm sure they exist somewhere.
Gears wrote:I wanted to be the best.
The EGE wrote:Mumpy wrote:And to this day, librarians revile Oregonaut as the Antichrist.
False! We sacrifice our card catalogues to him in the name of Job Security!
Oregonaut wrote:Gears wrote:I wanted to be the best.
Should've gone AFSO then.
Oregonaut wrote:What I'm still trying to figure out, and can't for the life of me, is why Brass can't get over the JF series. Yes, the avionics on the 22 were a bit wiggy at times, but be damned if that plane was going to be taken down by anything flying now or in the near future. Every war we've won has been won, in large part, due to air superiority being maintained. The Pentagram just does not seem to want to support the Air Force the way it should be.
Great things are done when Men & Mountains meet,
This is not Done by Jostling in the Street.
TheKrikkitWars wrote:Oregonaut wrote:Gears wrote:I wanted to be the best.
Should've gone AFSO then.
By which you mean the men who don't step on the big green foot, surely.
The EGE wrote:Mumpy wrote:And to this day, librarians revile Oregonaut as the Antichrist.
False! We sacrifice our card catalogues to him in the name of Job Security!
The EGE wrote:Mumpy wrote:And to this day, librarians revile Oregonaut as the Antichrist.
False! We sacrifice our card catalogues to him in the name of Job Security!
podbaydoor wrote:I think it's something you encounter in government in general, and organizations with lots of things with long names and titles. It becomes tiresome to say Office of Administration over and over again in a five second thought so "OA" is shorter and trips off the tongue easier.
The EGE wrote:Mumpy wrote:And to this day, librarians revile Oregonaut as the Antichrist.
False! We sacrifice our card catalogues to him in the name of Job Security!
Oh-Ah? Home of The Guardians? Office of Administration.... yeah, same difference. To be obeyed without question, dislike of insubordination or questioning orders, often balding, blue.... wait..Oregonaut wrote:podbaydoor wrote:I think it's something you encounter in government in general, and organizations with lots of things with long names and titles. It becomes tiresome to say Office of Administration over and over again in a five second thought so "OA" is shorter and trips off the tongue easier.
As long as you aren't talking about The Watchers. Oa isn't easy to say, either. It's tongue twisterish.
Users browsing this forum: BipAnina, Bkppiw39, Emellorncen, Farpappestals, Fekeenuisance, Gatsenventide, GuetraGma, HorNastonesse, Inpumeple, pletcherzbb, Preokcher, shealtket, Slageammalymn, SlefBalia, yurell and 5 guests