Moderators: Magistrates, Prelates, Moderators General
gmalivuk wrote:Yes. And if wishes were horses, wishing wells would fill up very quickly with drowned horses.King Author wrote:If space (rather, distance) is an illusion, it'd be possible for one meta-me to experience both body's sensory inputs.
josiahstevenson wrote:Actually, to be nitpicky, shouldn't it read "(P < .05)" in each case? You reject the null when the p-value is LESS than significance level you were looking for, I thought...
phlip wrote:josiahstevenson wrote:Actually, to be nitpicky, shouldn't it read "(P < .05)" in each case? You reject the null when the p-value is LESS than significance level you were looking for, I thought...
Right, so when p > 0.05, they don't reject the null hypothesis... thus "we found no link". The one panel where they do find a link does read "(p < 0.05)".
Coffee Stain wrote:It looks like there's a mistake in panel two. It probably should read without the word 'green', or else it sort of contradicts the panel with the "Whoa." Threw me off for a little bit as to what the joke was.
Diadem wrote:For a single experiment you should always divide your allowed margin of error by the number of variables you are testing for. So if you test n different colours of jelly beans, you must require p < 0.05/n before considering a result statistically significant. But this is often ignored.
Diadem wrote:For a single experiment you should always divide your allowed margin of error by the number of variables you are testing for. So if you test n different colours of jelly beans, you must require p < 0.05/n before considering a result statistically significant. But this is often ignored.
madock345 wrote:I wonder if this takes the prize for most panels in an XKCD comic (I know there have been comics larger than this, but I am refering specifically to the number of panels)
phlip wrote:josiahstevenson wrote:Actually, to be nitpicky, shouldn't it read "(P < .05)" in each case? You reject the null when the p-value is LESS than significance level you were looking for, I thought...
Right, so when p > 0.05, they don't reject the null hypothesis... thus "we found no link". The one panel where they do find a link does read "(p < 0.05)".
scarletmanuka wrote:madock345 wrote:I wonder if this takes the prize for most panels in an XKCD comic (I know there have been comics larger than this, but I am refering specifically to the number of panels)
The 2008 Christmas Special had more panels, though a lot of them were just black.
XKCD Loves the Discovery Channel had the same number of panels as this comic, and far less repetition.
jakerman999 wrote:There are also two panels with yellow(which have the same result, not the contradicting big green/little green scenario).
Quick, someone search for secret codes!
arbivark wrote:when i was first a tenant at 19, i was probably a nuisance .. a bother, to the landlord because i'd do stuff like, hey there's a fireplace here, get me a hammer, hey if i make a hole in my ceiling there's an attic that runs the length of the rowhouses.
ethereal_fire wrote:madock345, I like your sig : )
ethereal_fire wrote:
also, now I REALLY need to try minecraft.
madock345 wrote:ethereal_fire wrote:madock345, I like your sig : )
I enjoy recursive signatures.
Diadem wrote:Unfortunately, this is exactly how many scientists (not all, luckily, but too many) do statistics. They really do tests on dozens of variables at once, with several different statistical tests, and then publish the ones that are interesting.
For a single experiment you should always divide your allowed margin of error by the number of variables you are testing for. So if you test n different colours of jelly beans, you must require p < 0.05/n before considering a result statistically significant. But this is often ignored.
Return to Individual XKCD Comic Threads
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], ChronosDragon, micdi, yappobiscuits and 21 guests