Van wrote:Fireballs don't lie.
Shivahn wrote:I am a motherfucking sorceror.
John Doe wrote:Mafia City / Mafia Ocean:Spoiler:Annoying how mafia is lurking to death in MC but town is lurking to death in MO. I can't catch a break.
We also have a spoiler doc. All the spoilers in the discussion thread, copied into a doc. Yeah. It may work, but I'm not sure I could in good conscience recommend these methods. Maybe if you're not the kind of masochists who have anon PMs. XDPhoenixEnigma wrote:Some mods do that in addition to, or in place of, posting in the discussion thread. Inception is like that at the moment, I believe - PM the mods, and you can get access to the volumes of modnotes. What's missing there, though, are the thoughts of the players in the game, which are often quite entertaining. I do recall at least one game where the mod attempted to get players to PM that sort of thing to the mod and have them added to a google doc or something. It didn't work so well - as I recall, they had to resort to threatening modkills to get people to bother submitting anything that way.
ameretrifle wrote:I see you makin' shit rules in a game I love, and I'm like, fuck you. I guess the bullshit I sent you wasn't enough, and I'm like, fuck you, and your comod too. Said if I don't confess, yeah, I'm gonna be dead-- now ain't that some shit? (Ain't that some shit.) And though it pains me to send, here's my spoiler PM, and, uh, fuck you."
mpolo wrote:_infina_ was the only real case we had of that suspicion since I've been here, so I see it as pretty much a non-problem. I don't even remember if it turned out that he was just really lucky early on, or if he had actually succumbed to the temptation. In any case, he is now a respected member of our little community, so it doesn't really matter.
template wrote:Game Name
Mod(s): <mod name(s)>
Setup type(Open, Closed, semi-open)
Bastardry level: <least 0-10 most>
Heliman wrote:Hmm, Been thinking about this for awhile, and I guess the easiest way to prove if the spoiler system is abused at all would be to compare lynched scum who posted their role in the spoiler thread with scum that didn't post. This is coming from the guy whose not willing to conduct such a survey of course, so w/e.
_infina_ wrote:what would you think about a template for signups. I was thinking something like this:
RoadieRich wrote:Are there any thoughts on how to run the Vanilla signups? They're supposed to give priority to newbies, and that's what I was trying to do with my two-list signups. It ended up just over half newbies, with the extra IECs being listed as replacements, which is probably not too far off what we want. Is there a better way of promoting newbie priority in those games?
Weeks wrote:Finally, you could just duke it out ootd style and modkill at whim. Merciless but effective. "This is your last chance to survive, make your time."
Elvish Pillager wrote: Here, that means your 3 - if someone lurks or abandons games a few times, exclude them from games unless you're convinced they've reformed.
Dark Loink wrote:The problem with that is convincing someone that you are reformed is difficult without playing a few more games first.
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 4 guests