## alternative mathematics

For the discussion of math. Duh.

Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates

Tirian
Posts: 1891
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 6:03 pm UTC

### Re: alternative mathematics

It'd be a comfort if he would define his order rather than spending an axiom stating that, whatever it is, it is total.

kumarevo
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:02 pm UTC

### Re: alternative mathematics

skeptical scientist wrote:
kumarevo wrote:Cb comparability of the three numbers - open c>a=b , (9 opportunities)

Oh? I count 13.
a>b>c
a>c>b
b>a>c
b>c>a
c>a>b
c>b>a
a=b>c
a=c>b
b=c>a
a>b=c
b>a=c
c>a=b
a=b=c

number a is comparable with the numbers b and c-of these possibilities applies, not the ones that you gave
c>a>b , c>a=b , c>a<b , c=a>b , c=a=b , c=a<b , c<a>b , c<a=b ,c<a<b .

phlip
Restorer of Worlds
Posts: 7573
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:56 am UTC
Location: Australia
Contact:

### Re: alternative mathematics

But your "c>a<b" could be either a<b<c, a<c<b or a<b=c... all of those options are possible, since you only know that a is the smallest.
Similarly, "c<a>b" could be either b<c<a, c<b<a or b=c<a.

Code: Select all

`enum ಠ_ಠ {°□°╰=1, °Д°╰, ಠ益ಠ╰};void ┻━┻︵​╰(ಠ_ಠ ⚠) {exit((int)⚠);}`
[he/him/his]

kumarevo
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:02 pm UTC

### Re: alternative mathematics

phlip wrote:But your "c>a<b" could be either a<b<c, a<c<b or a<b=c... all of those options are possible, since you only know that a is the smallest.
Similarly, "c<a>b" could be either b<c<a, c<b<a or b=c<a.

number a must be in the middle- no: a>c>b , c=b=a ,...

nehpest
Posts: 518
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 9:25 pm UTC

### Re: alternative mathematics

Under the usual definitions, < > and = are transitive. In your system, are they not?
Kewangji wrote:Someone told me I need to stop being so arrogant. Like I'd care about their plebeian opinions.

blag

skeptical scientist
closed-minded spiritualist
Posts: 6142
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:09 am UTC
Location: San Francisco

### Re: alternative mathematics

kumarevo wrote:
phlip wrote:But your "c>a<b" could be either a<b<c, a<c<b or a<b=c... all of those options are possible, since you only know that a is the smallest.
Similarly, "c<a>b" could be either b<c<a, c<b<a or b=c<a.

number a must be in the middle- no: a>c>b , c=b=a ,...

This is inconsistent with your example q15.png (2.32 KiB) Viewed 1394 times

which is not on your list, since c<a>b doesn't tell you whether b=c.
I'm looking forward to the day when the SNES emulator on my computer works by emulating the elementary particles in an actual, physical box with Nintendo stamped on the side.

"With math, all things are possible." —Rebecca Watson

kumarevo
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:02 pm UTC

### Re: alternative mathematics

skeptical scientist wrote:
kumarevo wrote:
phlip wrote:But your "c>a<b" could be either a<b<c, a<c<b or a<b=c... all of those options are possible, since you only know that a is the smallest.
Similarly, "c<a>b" could be either b<c<a, c<b<a or b=c<a.

number a must be in the middle- no: a>c>b , c=b=a ,...

This is inconsistent with your example
q15.png

which is not on your list, since c<a>b doesn't tell you whether b=c.

This is a closed system of comparability of three numbers, according to a plane, it can and line
(=)c<a>b(=) - circular -(=)

kumarevo
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:02 pm UTC

### Re: alternative mathematics

Theorem: The number b the starting point going on points number a starting from the starting point

Ca 5+(.0)2=5
Cb 5+(.1)2=5
Cc 5+(.2)2=5
Cd 5+(.3)2=5
Ce 5+(.4)2=6
Cf 5+(.5)2=7
MS.12-addition

gmalivuk
GNU Terry Pratchett
Posts: 26828
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
Location: Here and There
Contact:

### Re: alternative mathematics

kumarevo wrote:The number b the starting point going on points number a starting from the starting point
This doesn't mean *anything* in English. And you can't keep calling things "theorem" when you can't prove them or even make them make sense.

We cannot understand what you're trying to say. Find someone fluent in both Serbian and English, and have them translate this for you.

Until then, I'm locking this thread. Please do not start another one about this topic.
Unless stated otherwise, I do not care whether a statement, by itself, constitutes a persuasive political argument. I care whether it's true.
---
If this post has math that doesn't work for you, use TeX the World for Firefox or Chrome

(he/him/his)

Return to “Mathematics”

### Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests