0915: Connoisseur

This forum is for the individual discussion thread that goes with each new comic.

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

Neodymium_Modem
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 3:16 pm UTC

0915: Connoisseur

Postby Neodymium_Modem » Wed Jun 22, 2011 5:47 am UTC

Image

Alt-text: "Our brains have just one scale, and we resize our experiences to fit."
Last edited by Neodymium_Modem on Wed Jun 22, 2011 5:55 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
pbnjstowell
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:35 am UTC
Location: Middle of Washington, USA

Re: 0915: "Connoisseur"

Postby pbnjstowell » Wed Jun 22, 2011 5:54 am UTC

(Quotation marks... you forgot them.)

How do we know it's not Miracle Whip?
Never trust a dog with orange eyebrows.

Neodymium_Modem
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 3:16 pm UTC

Re: 0915: "Connoisseur"

Postby Neodymium_Modem » Wed Jun 22, 2011 5:58 am UTC

pbnjstowell wrote:How do we know it's not Miracle Whip?


Miracle Whip is much more oily than mayo when it's thinned.

User avatar
Tyrannosaur
Posts: 107
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 5:39 am UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby Tyrannosaur » Wed Jun 22, 2011 6:00 am UTC

Is it weird that I would look at 500 stills of JB eating a sandwich? Although I would rather the Justin Bieber JB stills for sure.
djessop wrote:The t-shirt should read "There are 11 types of people in the world, those who understand binary, those who don't and those who insist the number above is pronounced as eleven no matter what base you're in".

uewebawo
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 5:27 am UTC
Contact:

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby uewebawo » Wed Jun 22, 2011 6:04 am UTC

the GIS for Canadian Surrealist Porn was disappointingly tame... or i'm hilariously jaded.
Now I know where baby tables come from!

Come see us over at Castle Arcanum

User avatar
jalohones
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 5:12 am UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby jalohones » Wed Jun 22, 2011 6:10 am UTC

uewebawo wrote:the GIS for Canadian Surrealist Porn was disappointingly tame... or i'm hilariously jaded.


And the search for Joe Biden eating a sandwich only gave me one palpable hit.

Ocker3
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 4:58 pm UTC
Location: Australia

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby Ocker3 » Wed Jun 22, 2011 6:23 am UTC

jalohones wrote:
uewebawo wrote:the GIS for Canadian Surrealist Porn was disappointingly tame... or i'm hilariously jaded.


And the search for Joe Biden eating a sandwich only gave me one palpable hit.


How do you inject a JB-sanger photo?
"why change something that's broken in a way that you know it's broken" - Brett McGrath

User avatar
glasnt
Posts: 539
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:18 am UTC
Location: SQUEE!

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby glasnt » Wed Jun 22, 2011 6:40 am UTC

This type of thinking has ruined coffee for me.

And poached eggs on toast.

Can't have any of the el cheapo crap anymore :(

Randomizer
Posts: 284
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:23 am UTC
Location: My walls are full of hungry wolves.
Contact:

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby Randomizer » Wed Jun 22, 2011 6:43 am UTC

I think Randall just compared XKCD to pictures of a man eating a sandwich, and the people of the forums discussing his comic to those stuck in a box talking about said sandwich-pictures.

At least, that's my interpretation. "And if you'll notice, that unlike in his set of Wikipedia comics, in this comic he... (etc., etc.)"
Belial wrote:I'm all outraged out. Call me when the violent rebellion starts.

User avatar
Stanistani
Posts: 73
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 6:13 pm UTC
Contact:

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby Stanistani » Wed Jun 22, 2011 6:44 am UTC

Mayonnaise all tastes the same to me.

Even though there's an entire world of gourmet mayo out there.

Soma
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 6:53 am UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby Soma » Wed Jun 22, 2011 6:55 am UTC

Stanistani wrote:Mayonnaise all tastes the same to me.

Even though there's an entire world of gourmet mayo out there.


The trick is to taste them all!

The comic is spot on and personally i think it is a good thing it describes.

americablanco
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:26 am UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby americablanco » Wed Jun 22, 2011 6:57 am UTC

Find this funny because I somehow related it to Schrödinger's cat when the box was mentioned.

Are they really looking at pictures in the box or only realizing them to fit their experience?

Veracity01
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 6:52 am UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby Veracity01 » Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:00 am UTC

Wow, this has been bothering me for years. It's funny how people scoff at you when you don't know something about their random interest.

It is almost like collecting mania but instead of actually collecting something, they collect facts about the topic.

Examples of this:
- Music
- Sports
- Politics
- Philosophy (Pff, have you never heard of the second coming by mister Not so Famous Philosopher?)
- Art

User avatar
Otto
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:30 pm UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby Otto » Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:11 am UTC

Beer is much more diverse and palette enriching than wine.

#justsaying

Game_boy
Posts: 1314
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 7:33 pm UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby Game_boy » Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:15 am UTC

The 'one scale's length does vary between people though. The best possible piece of music to each of persons A and B will still elicit a different magnitude of response.
The Reaper wrote:Evolution is a really really really long run-on sentence.

CobaltMouse
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 4:04 am UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby CobaltMouse » Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:19 am UTC

Surrealist Canadian porn, 500 pictures of Joe Biden eating a sandwich and two people crammed into a box, and a lovely and truthful comment on how much people often suck in hilarious and innocuous ways. Randall, get out of my head!

Kit.
Posts: 1117
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 5:14 pm UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby Kit. » Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:37 am UTC

Actually, it's not true of anything. In particular, it's not true for wine. Those snobs that cannot stand cheap wine are those who don't drink enough. Put them into a box with nothing to spend their time on but wine, and by the end of the year they will be able to stand anything alcohol related. Including glass cleaners.

shylocxs
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:39 am UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby shylocxs » Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:40 am UTC

This is exactly what it's like to be trained as an art historian. Trust me, I know.

Turing Machine
Posts: 98
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:48 am UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby Turing Machine » Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:58 am UTC

I don't understand taste, so it doesn't exist.

User avatar
FCN
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 7:47 am UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby FCN » Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:16 am UTC

Compare:
biden1.jpg
biden1.jpg (21.39 KiB) Viewed 20311 times

biden2.jpg
biden2.jpg (20.02 KiB) Viewed 20310 times

biden3.jpg

biden4.jpg
biden4.jpg (12.46 KiB) Viewed 20310 times

biden5.jpg


Of course there are dramatic aesthetic differences.
Spoiler:
LuNatic wrote:
Dear FCN,
You are:
a) Terrible, but in an awesome way.
or
b) Awesome, but in a terrible way.
I'm having difficulty deciding which.

Fougare
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:06 am UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby Fougare » Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:37 am UTC

I'm assuming slightly related to the current facebook "spam-link" that says that Joe Biden gets to eat sandwiches with the president on fridays, but that's all he gets, for 5 bucks donated to a random .co website you have a chance to eat DINNER with the president.

On topic: this happened to me with coffee, I used to think all coffee's were created equal (from doughnut shop to 7-11 to starbucks) though I am able to suppress the snobbishness connoisseurism to be able to drink any coffee because I have given up on anyone else's coffee and know that the one I make at home is superior to anything else. Besides, I enjoy caffeine in any form, so I can't afford to be too picky outside of my fresh black-self-roasted-self-ground-french-press coffee drank within 6 minutes in a bodum double layer glass cup for perfect temperature...

Randomizer
Posts: 284
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:23 am UTC
Location: My walls are full of hungry wolves.
Contact:

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby Randomizer » Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:41 am UTC

So, what are we comparing in determining which picture is better? Our overall sense of "this picture looks nicer than that one" (which has nothing to do with the sandwich or Biden at all) or are we looking at it from a more, um artsy-type approach? Because the first picture is definitely the best as far as simple aesthetics. Number three follows the Biden-sandwich theme the most closely, four has it's merits in the sandwich-diner combo, five, with Obama, is overshadowed by the presence of a celebrity which makes its artistic content harder to objectively judge, and I'm not sure what to say about number two, I mean there's definitely a sandwich there, but beyond that...

Also, we needed 500 images, not 5.
Belial wrote:I'm all outraged out. Call me when the violent rebellion starts.

User avatar
Plasma Mongoose
Posts: 213
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 1:09 am UTC
Contact:

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby Plasma Mongoose » Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:43 am UTC

Stanistani wrote:Mayonnaise all tastes the same to me.

Even though there's an entire world of gourmet mayo out there.


From my prospective, all mayonnaise might as well be made out of ipecac as I react the same way no matter what brand it was.

Also, all wine = rotten grapejuice to me.
A virus walks into a bar, the bartender says "We don't serve viruses in here".
The virus replaces the bartender and says "Now we do!"

Gammew
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 7:30 pm UTC
Location: Sweden

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby Gammew » Wed Jun 22, 2011 9:45 am UTC

Is White Hat Guy a new character?

User avatar
Fixblor
Posts: 182
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:20 am UTC
Location: Pencilvania

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby Fixblor » Wed Jun 22, 2011 9:50 am UTC

Alt-text wrote:Our brains have just one scale, and we resize our experiences to fit.


Any scale is relative to the items that are being measured; by a logical extension, every comparison is relative.
And of course perception is adaptive to the observed.

Biometrological Adaptivity Experiment:
Stare into the hollow of a tree, wearing a brimmed hat on a cloudless day, for a few minutes. Then look at the sun.

How long does the resizing of your pupils take to fit the experience?
Spoiler:
Don't stare at the sun.

How long does it take for the experience to resize and fit your brain?
Spoiler:
It doesn't, if you knew the first answer before the experiment began; unless you suffer from solar delusions.
Last edited by Count Modulus on Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:5l am UTC, edited 13 times in total.
06:23, 18 April 2011 SmackBot (talk | contribs) m (90,899 bytes) (Dated {{Dubious}} x 153. (Build p609)) (undo)

Spiny Norman
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 8:10 am UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby Spiny Norman » Wed Jun 22, 2011 10:16 am UTC

Fixblor wrote:
Alt-text wrote:Our brains have just one scale, and we resize our experiences to fit.


Any scale is relative to the items that are being measured; by a logical extension, every comparison is relative.
And of course perception is adaptive to the observed.

Biometrological Adaptivity Experiment:
Stare into the hollow of a tree, wearing a brimmed hat on a cloudless day, for a few minutes. Then look at the sun.

How long does the resizing of your pupils take to fit the experience?
Spoiler:
Don't stare at the sun.

How long does it take for the experience to resize and fit your brain?
Spoiler:
It doesn't, if you knew the first answer before the experiment began; unless you suffer from solar delusions.

You know why this is not the same, so I don't need to say it, right?

Speaking of scale, or off the scale, can I interest anyone in a lovely Paul Ross Canvas? It's got great reviews!
This topic desperately needs a post from Summer Glau.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
This is nøt å signåture.™

User avatar
Fixblor
Posts: 182
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:20 am UTC
Location: Pencilvania

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby Fixblor » Wed Jun 22, 2011 10:43 am UTC

Spiny Norman wrote:You know why this is not the same, so I don't need to say it, right?

Taking 'comparative studies' literally here ... everything's relative.
"Need" is subjective and thus questionable.
Therefore, you were right to say what you said.

Unless you're being facetious, in which case you're doubly right.
Last edited by Count Modulus on Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:5l am UTC, edited 13 times in total.
06:23, 18 April 2011 SmackBot (talk | contribs) m (90,899 bytes) (Dated {{Dubious}} x 153. (Build p609)) (undo)

Beardhammer
Posts: 565
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 4:40 am UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby Beardhammer » Wed Jun 22, 2011 10:49 am UTC

Otto wrote:Beer is much more diverse and palette enriching than wine.

#justsaying


Considering all wine is vile and overpriced, I absolutely agree.

JPatten
Posts: 98
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:39 pm UTC
Location: Southeast USA
Contact:

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby JPatten » Wed Jun 22, 2011 11:21 am UTC

FCN wrote:Compare:

Of course there are dramatic aesthetic differences.



Now I would have to say #3 is the best, the crop is a bit tight too tight but allows for good detail.
Number two would be good if the blurry foreground guy wasn't there. Ti think it could also benefit from a bit less Depth of field and blurring in the background to separate Biden from the people behind him. He risks blending into the suits.

I would have to agree that Obama in number 5 overwhelms Biden the sandwhich completely while number four just seems bland.

mjfgates
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 11:29 am UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby mjfgates » Wed Jun 22, 2011 11:33 am UTC

O gods, Rule 34.

One of these days, I'm going to have to make up a huge collage of throbbing-body-part images, just so I have a fast and easy way to 34-ize any picture I feel the... need... to. Joe Biden... eating a sandwich. Oh yeah.

Spiny Norman
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 8:10 am UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby Spiny Norman » Wed Jun 22, 2011 11:51 am UTC

Fixblor wrote:
Spiny Norman wrote:You know why this is not the same, so I don't need to say it, right?

Taking 'comparative studies' literally here ... everything's relative.
"Need" is subjective and thus questionable.
Therefore, you were right to say what you said.

Unless you're being facetious, in which case you're doubly right.

Ah yes, "right"... another example of relativity. Right for some, wrong for others.

But if everything is absolutely relative, why do we have a metric system?
This topic desperately needs a post from Summer Glau.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
This is nøt å signåture.™

User avatar
SirMustapha
Posts: 1302
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 6:07 pm UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby SirMustapha » Wed Jun 22, 2011 11:52 am UTC

Randomizer wrote:I think Randall just compared XKCD to pictures of a man eating a sandwich, and the people of the forums discussing his comic to those stuck in a box talking about said sandwich-pictures.


Nah, I don't think Randall would go there. To me, this comic reeks of self-indulgence: it's like Randall saying people should feel guilty or bad for knowing something more than him. Hat guy made a fair, solid point (if you tasted good wine, you'd start noticing the difference) and Randalltoken guy called him a "snobby connoisseur" and, in the end, was proven right.

But the execution this time around was very good: art is spot on, dialogue is good... he just had to mention Wikipedia there.

User avatar
radtea
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 8:57 pm UTC
Contact:

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby radtea » Wed Jun 22, 2011 12:00 pm UTC

Someone wrote:
I think Randall just compared XKCD to pictures of a man eating a sandwich, and the people of the forums discussing his comic to those stuck in a box talking about said sandwich-pictures.


Not at all... XKCD just happens to be exactly the scale of the human mind!

In fact, the existence of XKCD and the huge variety of Web-based media, strongly suggests that while each mind has a fixed scale, not all minds have the same scale. What fits comfortably into one will rattle around loose or be painfully tight in others.

But given the scale of an individual mind, all experiences will eventually be resized in the best Procrustean fashion, to fit.
Coming on Midsummer's Day to a Web Browser Near You: http://www.songsofalbion.com

User avatar
Plasma Man
Posts: 2035
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:27 am UTC
Location: Northampton, Northampton, Northampton middle England.

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby Plasma Man » Wed Jun 22, 2011 12:18 pm UTC

I like the continuity of the wine being sloshed out the glass in the third panel and the puddle being visible on the floor in the next one. I am a little bit of a wine ponce (as my girlfriend calls it), but in my experience all wine tastes good by the time you're drunk enough to be spilling it.
The point raised is interesting, but it's not a simple matter. I used to enjoy drinking lager, and graduated my appreciation scale according to that. Now my tastes have changed and I appreciate bitters and ales more and calibrate my appreciation scale to them, meaning lager is now simply rated in degrees of disgustingness.
Please note that despite the lovely avatar Sungura gave me, I am not a medical doctor.

Possibly my proudest moment on the fora.

dg8672
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:51 pm UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby dg8672 » Wed Jun 22, 2011 12:19 pm UTC

SirMustapha wrote:Nah, I don't think Randall would go there. To me, this comic reeks of self-indulgence: it's like Randall saying people should feel guilty or bad for knowing something more than him. Hat guy made a fair, solid point (if you tasted good wine, you'd start noticing the difference) and Randalltoken guy called him a "snobby connoisseur" and, in the end, was proven right.



I'll agree with this to a point, but I think it's telling that White Hat Guy was the one who felt the need to push his 'connosseurism' off on the other guy. Token guy was enjoying his wine and White Hat guy decided it was his place to set him straight.

All Randall is saying (I believe) is that everyone has something that they feel this strongly about. For me, its cooking and movies. To some of my friends, its music. Others, books.

We scale our individual minds to change the importance of these things according to our perceptions, and we sometimes cannot understand why someone outside of ourselves cannot see the same level of importance.

In short, we're all geeks about something. Sometimes, our circumstances and environment dictate what we're actually geeks about.

squig
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 12:32 pm UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby squig » Wed Jun 22, 2011 12:30 pm UTC

Fixblor wrote:... everything's relative.

Incest is all relative also.

User avatar
SirMustapha
Posts: 1302
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 6:07 pm UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby SirMustapha » Wed Jun 22, 2011 12:33 pm UTC

dg8672 wrote:I'll agree with this to a point, but I think it's telling that White Hat Guy was the one who felt the need to push his 'connosseurism' off on the other guy. Token guy was enjoying his wine and White Hat guy decided it was his place to set him straight.


That is a solid starting point, but the way to comic starts, it suggests something different. Hat guy is holding a glass, so I suppose they're going to share the wine; it's not terribly unreasonable for him to make a commentary about the wine. Besides, cheap wine? That'd be sort of like your friend bringing you in to enjoy his sound system, and then putting on Rebecca Black.

There are more clear, more sensible ways to introduce hat guy as a really snobby connoisseur. The way the comic starts off, it's sort of like Randall doesn't know what a truly snobby person sounds like, and then he goes into a "I DON'T KNOW I DON'T CARE ABOUT NOTHING LEAVE ME ALONE" when you merely suggest him something different.

Spiny Norman
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 8:10 am UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby Spiny Norman » Wed Jun 22, 2011 12:33 pm UTC

squig wrote:
Fixblor wrote:... everything's relative.

Incest is all relative also.

Keep it in the family, that's what some would say.
This topic desperately needs a post from Summer Glau.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
This is nøt å signåture.™

Spiny Norman
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 8:10 am UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby Spiny Norman » Wed Jun 22, 2011 12:35 pm UTC

radtea wrote:Not at all... XKCD just happens to be exactly the scale of the human mind!

Do you know Douglas Adams' puddle analogy?
Douglas Adams wrote:Imagine a puddle waking up one morning and thinking, "This is an interesting world I find myself in — an interesting hole I find myself in — fits me rather neatly, doesn't it? In fact it fits me staggeringly well, must have been made to have me in it!"
This topic desperately needs a post from Summer Glau.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
This is nøt å signåture.™

biodomino
Posts: 67
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 7:18 am UTC

Re: 0915: Connoisseur

Postby biodomino » Wed Jun 22, 2011 12:46 pm UTC

Perhaps this is just the low-hanging fruit, but I took it as a reference to the fact that wine connoisseurship is mostly bunk. A number of studies have demonstrated that supposed wine experts cannot distinguish between basic information such as the origins of wines. Apparently it's more an opportunity to revel in snobbery about a predominantly subjective experience, like one might do with literature or art, except without so much prerequisite knowledge and skills for discernment.


Return to “Individual XKCD Comic Threads”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: burndive and 113 guests