Moderators: SecondTalon, Moderators General, Prelates
Jorpho wrote:Come now: Zork may have been the first major text adventure, but that just means that it made a whole lot of mistakes that were avoided in later generations.
So a full third of the game is bad?Box Boy wrote:for everything it did wrong, it did two other things -right-
Naurgul wrote:I'm probably just describing a game that doesn't and won't ever exist, but I've got to give it a try anyway:
I'm looking for a game I can casually play every day or every other day for small amounts of time (30-120 minutes). I don't have a preference on genre but I'd like if it was multiplayer and playable with a small number of people (3-5). I'd prefer co-op but a competitive game would be somewhat fine too, I guess. Then, I'd like it to be mostly relaxed in pace and strategy. Not too slow and not completely devoid of thinking but keep in mind that I consider most FPSs too fast-paced and I wouldn't want to be continuously thinking and doubting what I should be doing. It would also be nice if in each session you started where you left off in a continuing campaign instead of starting over.
Naurgul wrote:I'm probably just describing a game that doesn't and won't ever exist, but I've got to give it a try anyway:
I'm looking for a game I can casually play every day or every other day for small amounts of time (30-120 minutes). I don't have a preference on genre but I'd like if it was multiplayer and playable with a small number of people (3-5). I'd prefer co-op but a competitive game would be somewhat fine too, I guess. Then, I'd like it to be mostly relaxed in pace and strategy. Not too slow and not completely devoid of thinking but keep in mind that I consider most FPSs too fast-paced and I wouldn't want to be continuously thinking and doubting what I should be doing. It would also be nice if in each session you started where you left off in a continuing campaign instead of starting over.
Chuff wrote:I write most of my letters from the bottom
Goldstein wrote:I'm looking for one or two iPhone (God, I know. Sorry) games that I can play in small chunks - probably some sort of roguelike and a management/development/strategy game, but I don't know what's available or why the store search suggests what it does. Besides, you guys will have a better idea of what's good than any review site I might find. Any ideas?
Chuff wrote:I write most of my letters from the bottom
TheBanana wrote:Anyone have any recommendations for a good co-op first person shooter or action game? One that is either coming out soon or is already out. Preferably for the Xbox and relatively recent.
I've played left 4 dead, borderlands and gears of war before and I'm not really into Call of Duty so I'm just wondering if there's other fun co-op games I've been missing.
How absurd! You've already bought the game, so why don't you start playing it and make up your own mind!?emceng wrote:So I bought a DS. I figure I'd like to try Pokemon I guess, so I picked up Platinum. Is that one any good?
This is also absurd. It is difficult to suggest a game without knowing something about your preferences.Any other suggestions for DS games? It came with Scribblenauts, Mario, a few I don't care about, and I bought Dragon Quest 6.
TheBanana wrote:Naurgul wrote:I'm probably just describing a game that doesn't and won't ever exist, but I've got to give it a try anyway:
I'm looking for a game I can casually play every day or every other day for small amounts of time (30-120 minutes). I don't have a preference on genre but I'd like if it was multiplayer and playable with a small number of people (3-5). I'd prefer co-op but a competitive game would be somewhat fine too, I guess. Then, I'd like it to be mostly relaxed in pace and strategy. Not too slow and not completely devoid of thinking but keep in mind that I consider most FPSs too fast-paced and I wouldn't want to be continuously thinking and doubting what I should be doing. It would also be nice if in each session you started where you left off in a continuing campaign instead of starting over.
Late reply I know but I couldn't help but think of Borderlands when I read about what you are looking for. Borderlands is a lot of fun and very casual. It's a FPS with certain RPG elements (leveling, character class, abilities and item acquisition) and it's co-op up to 4 players. Definitely one of the most all-round enjoyable games that I've played in the past couple of years.
emceng wrote:So I bought a DS. I figure I'd like to try Pokemon I guess, so I picked up Platinum. Is that one any good? Any other suggestions for DS games? It came with Scribblenauts, Mario, a few I don't care about, and I bought Dragon Quest 6.
Chuff wrote:I write most of my letters from the bottom
Enokh wrote:I'm pretty sure the answer is "no", but here goes:
Is there an MMO that is Fantasy-based, has no or easily avoidable PVP, and has an endgame that doesn't require grouping with more than five or ten people (so no 25-man instances, as an example)?
I like me some MMOs, and my wife could be interested in them, but the above three things are her prerequisites. It's a losing battle, methinks. Here's hoping that the Star Wars MMO will keep the really large groups completely optional, I guess.
Jesse wrote:you already play LoL, so your micro/apm should be pretty good
Jesse wrote:Get SC2, you already play LoL, so your micro/apm should be pretty good, and the macro skills will come with practise. Also, it's increidbly fun.
Can you narrow it down just a smidgen?The Milkman wrote:I'm trying to find a game that I can play through casually, put a good amount of thought into and also will keep for a long time.
If you could, because I've been searching for something like this for a long time..
The Milkman wrote:I like sorts of strategy games(hence the put some thought into it), but the real idea here is to be able to keep and be able to be played a lot and not get old/boring.
Rakysh wrote:Basically, xkcd is basically for punching into submission the dumb frat guy in your brain.
Vaniver wrote:Harvard is a hedge fund that runs the most prestigious dating agency in the world, and incidentally employs famous scientists to do research.
afuzzyduck wrote:ITS MEANT TO BE FLUTTERSHY BUT I JUST SEE AAERIELE! CURSE YOU FORA!
SexyTalon wrote:The Milkman wrote:I like sorts of strategy games(hence the put some thought into it), but the real idea here is to be able to keep and be able to be played a lot and not get old/boring.
Roguelikes, any of 'em.
Not that Roguelikes isn't a serious suggestion, but if you don't help us out a bit more, we can't help you. What do you already own? Which ones do you like? Anything more specific than Strategy Games? Because that's still broad enough to include Chess, Civilization, Starcraft, and Etherlords, all of which are fairly different games.
Sarr wrote:So, I'd forgotten this thread existed, and it's exactly what I need. I found my Game Boy Color recently and it works, but my games have been lost to the ages. It'd be a shame to have such a nice handheld sitting around useless, so it's advice time - what Game Boy Color games are worth searching out and getting? I remember a few from my childhood (Pokemon, Dragon Warrior Monsters, Link's Awakening), but other than that I don't know what to look for.
Rakysh wrote:Basically, xkcd is basically for punching into submission the dumb frat guy in your brain.
The Milkman wrote:Okay, I'll admit, it was a bit vague. I don't really like RTS games; they tend to get too frantic and competitive for my taste. Turn-based games seem to be the right balance of thought and time that I need, and I personally now have none of them, as I really haven't bought any game like this before. So you could say I'm a newbie at things like this.
Hope that gives some sort of clarity.
Heh. That's unlikely.Sarr wrote:Thanks, guys, I've got a list now. Just hope I can find most of them cheaply.