Moderators: jestingrabbit, Moderators General, Prelates
roband wrote:The problem is that you're suggesting a NL at 5+2. I'd much rather NL at 4+1 (unless I'm certain on a read).
webby wrote:It's a busy weekend, so I haven't been on much. I'll try to post some proper content tomorrow or on Monday morning (which is probably Sunday where most of you guys are).
Don't mess up the deadlines - remember that Monday evening Gopher's time is likely to be your late Sunday night/early Monday morning.
But I think when the time comes we're going to vote No Lynch?
Van wrote:I like simple games.
Like Wizardry.
roband wrote:Time to start voting NL then I guess.
Or shall we just lynch NoS rather than NLing?
Van wrote:I like simple games.
Like Wizardry.
cjdrum wrote:I posted!
So... Deadline is about nowish.
Vote self? Not vote self?
Either way. I've lost. Not sure about you guys. Well done, winners!
roband wrote:Cheers GoP, I enjoyed that.
Users browsing this forum: Diemo and 1 guest