Are you Major-ist?

The school experience. School related queries, discussions, and stories that aren't specific to a subject.

Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby fuzzycuzzy » Fri Jul 15, 2011 8:15 pm UTC

NecklaceOfShadow wrote:10:54 am UTC

KestrelLowing wrote:Oh wow, I didn't think anyone was actually taking me seriously. [...] This is a serious thread? :shock:



-facepalm-

...It wasn't supposed to be...

NecklaceOfShadow wrote:
KL wrote:
Would I ever want humanities majors to vanish? No! (Well, maybe a few select ones...) My mom's a music major and I think she's one of the smartest people I know. It would just be less of an issue if humanities majors were to vanish than STEM majors.



I'm not homophobic. I'm not scared of gay people (but I still don't want them to touch me.) One of my best friends is gay! I just think that they don't deserve my rights.

Wait... what..?

Anyways, I got a joke to lighten things up.

How many philosophy majors does it take to screw in a light bulb?
What light bulb?
HA!

Ok, my two cents:

There was an amazing book called The Phantom Tollbooth; changed my life when I was nine. In it, a boy ventured to two kingdoms, one of numbers and one of words. [Internal monologue: why am I quoting a children's book verbatim? Damn, I'm pathetic] Blah, blah, blah, a bunch of stuff happens and then some princess says something about whether its better to name the stars or count the sands.

Who cares? The likelihood that you'll get remembered after you die is much more about how well you do the thing you're good at than what you actually do.
Last edited by fuzzycuzzy on Fri Jul 15, 2011 8:19 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.
fuzzycuzzy
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 3:11 am UTC
Location: more of a state-of-mind really... hmm? what?

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby gmalivuk » Fri Jul 15, 2011 8:17 pm UTC

KestrelLowing wrote:And yes, I don't actually have a clue as to what would happen if a significant portion of the world were to disappear.
So you don't have a clue about this, and yet you wrote a long post about it anyway. You had no statistics to back up your earlier nonsense, and yet you shared it with the rest of us anyway. You admittedly can't communicate very well, and yet you keep digging yourself a bit deeper every time you post in this thread...

Critical thinking skills are the basis of engineering and technology. Have you ever written code for an entire day? (Note: I haven't, I can't code well) It's creating something new using very precise sequences and structure. You have to question your assumptions all the time when things you thought for certain would work just don't. You have to have the critical thinking skills
Troubleshooting is not the same as critical thinking.
In the future, there will be a global network of billions of adding machines.... One of the primary uses of this network will be to transport moving pictures of lesbian sex by pretending they are made out of numbers.
Spoiler:
gmss1 gmss2
User avatar
gmalivuk
Archduke Vendredi of Skellington the Third, Esquire
 
Posts: 19271
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
Location: Here, There, Everywhere (near Boston, anyway)

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby KestrelLowing » Fri Jul 15, 2011 8:30 pm UTC

Dream wrote:
KestrelLowing wrote:They can do the process, they don't understand the meaning.

You think arts graduates, as a rule, don't understand the meaning of fractions or long division? I know several who understand Fourier transforms in great theoretical detail, not that your assertion of opinion really needs a counterexample.


Really, do I have to spell out the fact that it doesn't apply to all humanities majors ? (Which, I did) Ok, I get it. I'm the bad guy here and you're (general you here) feeling attacked. I get it.

I'm sorry as you (general you again) are reacting just like I would if you said STEM majors typically don't understand the reasons behind persuasive rhetoric. There may be a bit of truth in it, but I'm blowing it out of proportion and you're mad because of that. Sorry.

Also, if a humanities major understands Fourier transforms, what are they doing? (Honestly, I'm curious. Did they just like math, or are they doing things with Fourier transforms in their work?)

I'd actually argue that a good portion of STEM majors don't really understand the concepts they use either.

Oh, if anyone hasn't checked out Vihart on youtube, you totally should. She does a great job of showcasing the meaning behind certain mathematical concepts. Really, she's awesome, and quite amusing.

Bakemaster wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb and hypothesize that the two of you are operating with significantly different ideas about what "critical thinking" entails.

That's quite possible. I was using the wikipedia definition:
refers to higher-order thinking that questions assumptions. It is a way of deciding whether a claim is true, false, or sometimes true and sometimes false, or partly true and partly false.


Mainly the "questions assumptions" part.

It does come to my attention that I may not know what I'm talking about here though with the partly true and partly false. How can something be partly true and partly false? Are we assuming it's something that was said? Are we assuming it was the previous knowledge and has now been proven partially incorrect? Are we assuming it's two contradictory statements that have both been approved, but we don't have quite all the information? All of those make sense. Something actually being partly true and partly false doesn't make sense at all. We may not be able to fully perceive it and that's why it seems partly true and partly false, but in the end something is either true or false. (Of course, this very much parallels an argument I have quite often with my BF - if reality is perception. I argue it isn't as there is one reality that is the actual thing, he argues it doesn't matter because no one can ever perceive it so reality is actually perception and everyone has different realities. It's something we're never going to budge on - at least I won't!)
User avatar
KestrelLowing
 
Posts: 1125
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:57 pm UTC
Location: Michigan

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby Angua » Fri Jul 15, 2011 8:37 pm UTC

I sort of get the idea that critical thinking is different from an arts perspective - they are more to do with philosphy and deep questions like the actual meaning of truth (I've never done that so this is just from conversations) whereas in our medical course we're taught to 'critically analyse' research papers which is more about looking at the assumptions made and if other things could explain what they found (which is similar to the arts, but maybe a bit different?).

The only thing I've ever found a bit annoying about arts majors, is that they don't have many lectures (UK, so you only do the subject that you're doing), have no labs, little seminars, so little contact time, and they complain when they have to pull an allnighter to finish an essay that they've had a week to do (sometimes more) and hadn't even started!!!! And some of them do them after going out clubbing (so while drunk) and still manage something vaguely coherent. Of course, I only hear this from arts majors who are the sort to procrastinate and put stuff off (so selection bias there) but the idea of them having so little contact time and seeming as though they only do work at the last minute is so annoying! (However, maybe it's just jealousy that they don't have to put in as much contact time as the scientists do).
“When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries disappear and life stands explained.” - Mark Twain
User avatar
Angua
Don't call her Delphine
 
Posts: 3084
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:42 pm UTC
Location: UK/St. Kitts and Nevis Occasionally, I migrate to the US for a bit

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby Dream » Sat Jul 16, 2011 12:08 am UTC

KestrelLowing wrote:Really, do I have to spell out the fact that it doesn't apply to all humanities majors ?

You don't seem to understand that saying "most" and qualifying by saying "not all" doesn't mean you get to dig up by repeating the part about saying "not all". If you think most humanities graduate educated teachers can't understand the principles behind elementary maths, but only mechanistically follow the forms, you are wrong. Claiming "I didn't mean everyone" misses the point that you were wrong about "most".

KestrelLowing wrote:Also, if a humanities major understands Fourier transforms, what are they doing?

Signal processing in music. Similarly, I learned some geometry in Art History, which I personally already knew most of, but it was still in the course. Some liguists learn machine translation, some philosophers learn computer programming for logic, economists often learn statistical analysis, and so on.
I knew a woman once, but she died soon after.
User avatar
Dream
WINNING
 
Posts: 4339
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:20 pm UTC
Location: The Hollow Scene Epic

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby TheGrammarBolshevik » Sat Jul 16, 2011 1:41 am UTC

KestrelLowing wrote:I will tend to have a lower opinion of someone if I know they're a communications or gender studies major because I do not deem those majors useful (yeah, I know, it's horrible).

I will tend to have a lower opinion of someone if I know that they view those around them as instruments of economic production.

KestrelLowing wrote:Oh wow, I didn't think anyone was actually taking me seriously. This is all totally just personal.

Yes, indeed. Being categorically insulted on the basis of one's field of study is quite personal.

As for the sense of "personal" which you intended, offering evidence for a view moves it well outside the criticism-bubble afforded to arbitrary subjective judgments.

KestrelLowing wrote:(weird apocalyptic scenario)

Is this relevant to anything?
#xkcd-q — a pretty neat LGBTQIQ channel on Foonetic

"Grant me chastity and continence, but not yet." —St. Augustine

Ceterum autem censeo, Yalensem esse delendam.
User avatar
TheGrammarBolshevik
waldo waldorf waldron waldron's wale waler wales waley walfish walford walgreen walhalla
 
Posts: 4257
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 2:12 am UTC
Location: Where.

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby doogly » Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:38 am UTC

I have a few majorisms!

The Classics turf war is a big one. Philosophy departments might not be shitty at talking about about Greek philosophy; maaaaybe they're OK sometimes. But oh man, I had a friend tell me once what the Government department was saying about the Republic. Made me shiver. And History... well actually, History departments seemed to have lost their turf war to all the various cultural studies et al. I don't mind this.

Computer Science and Math people are good at solving the problems they pose for themselves. When a Physics person needs to use a computer or do some math, we generally have to do it ourselves. It's frustrating sometimes. I have these friends who I want to corral into doing work for me, but they're all like "why the hell should anyone know what a Bessel function is anymore" and I'm like. Ugh. They are of course quite good at the problems they pose for themselves! I think we also visit them more than they visit us, but maybe there is a selection effect here. People who have studied logic qua logic are generally agreeable and pleasant to chat with.

"Writing" departments seem to pass off their sets of biases as universal. I never tell kiddies they should write their English essays according to the standards of a lab report, but for some reason they keep bringing their nonsense from other places into these places. But the kiddies are also super shocked that anyone outside of an English department might want grammar to be correct.

Philosophy departments are still working on getting the memo that cultures apart from Europe exist. I think it's getting a little better?
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.

Meaux: It's not jumping the shark if you never come down.
User avatar
doogly
Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
 
Posts: 3849
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
Location: Somerville, MA

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby TheGrammarBolshevik » Sat Jul 16, 2011 3:48 am UTC

Well, we're still working on defining things like "exist" and figuring out whether (and how) we can know if anything does such a thing. As it stands, we haven't even nailed down Europe, let alone its cultures!
#xkcd-q — a pretty neat LGBTQIQ channel on Foonetic

"Grant me chastity and continence, but not yet." —St. Augustine

Ceterum autem censeo, Yalensem esse delendam.
User avatar
TheGrammarBolshevik
waldo waldorf waldron waldron's wale waler wales waley walfish walford walgreen walhalla
 
Posts: 4257
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 2:12 am UTC
Location: Where.

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby doogly » Sat Jul 16, 2011 3:56 am UTC

Ah, defining things.
Yeah, maybe it is a majorism to say that all of Philosophy is Semantics? I think there actually people in Philosophy who agree with this proposition though.
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.

Meaux: It's not jumping the shark if you never come down.
User avatar
doogly
Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
 
Posts: 3849
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
Location: Somerville, MA

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby The Mighty Thesaurus » Sat Jul 16, 2011 6:29 am UTC

I don't see how KL can read her own posts and conclude that she needs fewer English classes.
My games
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam
LE4dGOLEM wrote:your ability to tell things from things remains one of your skills.

Weeks wrote:Not only can you tell things from things, you can recognize when a thing is a thing
User avatar
The Mighty Thesaurus
a.k.a. The Puissant Lexicographical Tome
 
Posts: 4220
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 7:47 am UTC
Location: Drowning in an ocean of sorrow

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby Jahoclave » Sat Jul 16, 2011 6:34 am UTC

Dream wrote:
KestrelLowing wrote:Also, if a humanities major understands Fourier transforms, what are they doing?

Signal processing in music. Similarly, I learned some geometry in Art History, which I personally already knew most of, but it was still in the course. Some liguists learn machine translation, some philosophers learn computer programming for logic, economists often learn statistical analysis, and so on.

Even beyond linguists, computer programming to do searches through vast swaths of digitized archives are becoming used in literature research to pick up on trends.

@doogly: I wouldn't be surprised on the philosophy departments taking forever on that one given non-European lit is finally making a transcendence in departments; and, couple that with philosophy departments getting the axe under budget constraints it's probably going to take even longer.

Also, as for culture studies, it's going to carve a very large swath through the humanities if budgets keep getting slashed. Hell, if English departments weren't responsible for those gen ed writing programs and various gender studies programs being on a strong defensive it'd probably have already happened. Pretty much anything you can attach critical theory to can get wrapped into that quite easily, even some of the soft sciences. I think the real issue is a lot of people not wanting to admit that their areas of study overlap and that there aren't neat divisions.

And I have to conquer with Bolshevik: If all you're doing is looking at people with a gaze of utility value you can fuck right off. If you judged everything by utility value a lot of pure science research wouldn't get funding and there's a lot of minority groups out there who live in a better world today in part because of programs like gender studies who did a hell of a lot of consciousness raising. Hell, a sociology department nearly brought down the French government.

@Thesaurus: given KL's rants against high school English and my experience with students fresh out of high school, there might be problems with even doing the first part. Honestly, how do people graduate high school without even knowing what a paragraph is or that sentences need to have subjects and verbs?
User avatar
Jahoclave
sourmilk's moderator
 
Posts: 4679
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 8:34 pm UTC
Location: Springfield, MO

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby Nat » Sat Jul 16, 2011 1:25 pm UTC

Puppyclaws wrote:Here is how my thought experiment goes: If all STEM majors were to die out, their work would be easily reproduced seeing as how it is based on the scientific method and thus easily verifiable and capable of being recreated. There also exists a plethora of reading material on STEM subjects which is fairly easy to understand for people who know how to read and analyze text, which non-STEM types do.

Ok, you seriously think humanities majors, with their "reading and analyzing text" training, could understand complex science and math that takes STEM majors years to understand (and even then, only the best of them ever really get it)?
most of what STEM majors learn is critical thinking. It's how to think about concepts. And from what I've seen of humanities majors, most of them just can't do it, because their training involves a lot more knowledge cramming and a lot less actual thinking.
Nat
 
Posts: 111
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 7:59 pm UTC

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby The Mighty Thesaurus » Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:01 pm UTC

Nat wrote:most of what STEM majors learn is critical thinking. It's how to think about concepts. And from what I've seen of humanities majors, most of them just can't do it, because their training involves a lot more knowledge cramming and a lot less actual thinking.
img_066.jpg


Have you actually studied the humanities beyond an introductory course?
My games
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam
LE4dGOLEM wrote:your ability to tell things from things remains one of your skills.

Weeks wrote:Not only can you tell things from things, you can recognize when a thing is a thing
User avatar
The Mighty Thesaurus
a.k.a. The Puissant Lexicographical Tome
 
Posts: 4220
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 7:47 am UTC
Location: Drowning in an ocean of sorrow

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby Izawwlgood » Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:05 pm UTC

Nat wrote:
Puppyclaws wrote:Here is how my thought experiment goes: If all STEM majors were to die out, their work would be easily reproduced seeing as how it is based on the scientific method and thus easily verifiable and capable of being recreated. There also exists a plethora of reading material on STEM subjects which is fairly easy to understand for people who know how to read and analyze text, which non-STEM types do.

Ok, you seriously think humanities majors, with their "reading and analyzing text" training, could understand complex science and math that takes STEM majors years to understand (and even then, only the best of them ever really get it)?
most of what STEM majors learn is critical thinking. It's how to think about concepts. And from what I've seen of humanities majors, most of them just can't do it, because their training involves a lot more knowledge cramming and a lot less actual thinking.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...

You're dumb.
-I know this: if life is illusion, then I am no less an illusion, and being thus, the illusion is real to me. I live, I burn with life, I love, I slay, and am content.
-We can't go back. But I suppose we can go wherever we please.
User avatar
Izawwlgood
WINNING
 
Posts: 13926
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 3:55 pm UTC
Location: There may be lovelier lovelies...

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby TheGrammarBolshevik » Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:07 pm UTC

I know right? All these humanities majors with their damn amino acid flashcards…
#xkcd-q — a pretty neat LGBTQIQ channel on Foonetic

"Grant me chastity and continence, but not yet." —St. Augustine

Ceterum autem censeo, Yalensem esse delendam.
User avatar
TheGrammarBolshevik
waldo waldorf waldron waldron's wale waler wales waley walfish walford walgreen walhalla
 
Posts: 4257
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 2:12 am UTC
Location: Where.

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby KestrelLowing » Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:12 pm UTC

The Mighty Thesaurus wrote:I don't see how KL can read her own posts and conclude that she needs fewer English classes.


Not fewer - different. (Although of course I'd prefer fewer - but I kind of see that as preferring fewer brussel sprouts) Analyzing literature just isn't at all useful to me. Learning how to write and communicate better is something I definitely need, but that class just doesn't exist as far as I have seen. I've managed to BS my way through many literature classes and yet I still haven't learned to write any better. That's a major problem. School seems to believe that you're either a good writer or your just not - there's nothing you can do about it. I don't think it's true or necessarily the mindset of many humanities teachers, but I don't think anyone has figured out a really good way to teach writing. Everyone who goes into humanities majors just seems to be somewhat naturally talented in that aspect so good classes are hard to come by.

And, once again, I want to apologize for undermining people's majors, but that's simply how I view them. Here's your chance to make me see differently. I'm really trying to become more open-minded in general, so I'll really try hard to understand. Why are humanities majors important? The things that usually come up are communication and critical thinking, but I really do think that those are also taught just as well in STEM fields - just differently (and equally as bad with the communication deal). So what else do humanities majors do or learn that is crucial to our society?

And I'm sorry for kind of playing devils advocate and kind of not. I must admit this is what I believe. No, it's not particularly right and maybe I have the wrong idea for thinking that people are mostly valuable economically, but those are just my current beliefs. My major problem is that I just cannot get along with the majority of humanities majors. They're annoying and our personalities just don't mesh (as is shown by this thread). I'm sure I annoy the majority of them too. I value logic above everything else and it's very difficult for socially awkward me to understand why anyone would value anything more. Humanities majors create great things - but only if you're on the very top tier. Otherwise, it seems as if you never get to use your major and that doesn't make sense to me.

EDIT: It just occurred to me that by the fewer English classes you were probably talking about when I was complaining about the imbalance in high school of humanities to STEM courses. I'd be fine with the amount of math and science being raised to the amount of humanities.
User avatar
KestrelLowing
 
Posts: 1125
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:57 pm UTC
Location: Michigan

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby Viae » Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:24 pm UTC

Assuming you disagree with knowledge for knowledge's sake, History, for example, is vital for the understanding of today's society (presumably a worthy enough goal) seeing as everything that happens, happens in the context of that which has come before.
The Mighty Thesaurus wrote:Also, I think your title should be "colossus", and I don't care if nobody agrees.
User avatar
Viae
 
Posts: 307
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:48 pm UTC
Location: Albion

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby doogly » Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:50 pm UTC

Old story, possibly apocryphal, but told to me by a prof in the Columbia Classics department, so possibly not!

It was back in the 70s, I think, when budgets were first showing signs of tightening. The provost (or other admin thing) got all the department heads together. Cuts were going to have to be made. So he says, look, some things are very entrenched, but we have to put *everything* on the table. So, tell me about your departments. Why are they important? Why are they necessary? And so everyone goes over the justification for their department.

It gets to Classics. "Classics is completely unnecessary, and that it is why it is necessary."
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.

Meaux: It's not jumping the shark if you never come down.
User avatar
doogly
Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
 
Posts: 3849
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
Location: Somerville, MA

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby charolastra » Sat Jul 16, 2011 3:05 pm UTC

KestrelLowing wrote:Learning how to write and communicate better is something I definitely need, but that class just doesn't exist as far as I have seen

It's called remedial English. I can't remember past middle school actually "learning how to write". Taking critiques of my writing and emulating the writing I was analyzing, sure, but never any deeper than that. That was also, by the way, how I learned to write academically in Spanish past Spanish 3.

I walk in with two biases: one, I double majored in international environmental policy and political science and double minored in environmental science and Latin American studies (so, two social sciences, an applied science, and humanities for anyone counting), and two, I have a job that has no undergraduate major equivalent. Like most jobs. Unfortunately, due to cancer, I am unable to pursue my original career path which was Peace Corps -> Department of State.

I purposefully went to a liberal arts-style research university to avoid the biases toward STEM majors. Some of the assumptions about social sciences and humanities coursework astound me- memorizing facts? If that is some kind of code for hunting down first person documents in several languages (my papers included Spanish, French, Icelandic, and Portuguese FPS, not to mention all levels and styles of English), volunteering time at nonprofits and speaking to people to de-academify what I was learning, figuring out solutions to world and environmental problems, and a whole lot of writing, then sure, I memorized a lot of facts. Easy? The hardest class I have ever taken was a history class covering 40 years of Argentinian political, economic, and social upheaval. Seminars with 10 people in them are HARD. At least half of my classes were small seminars and you better believe you had to be on your game the entire time.

If there is any question to the need for the arts, it only goes to show the lack of critical thinking encouraged in STEM majors. Take my job for example- I work in higher ed communications. Even our webtech guy was an English major. Most of my job is writing, thinking strategically, organizing a whole lot of information thrown at me, and planning. I'm not saying that I couldn't do that if I was a STEM major, but the skills I learned from my social science and humanities courses serve me much better in the professional world.

As an anecdote, I studied abroad in Iceland on an engineering program as the only non STEM major. I got the highest GPA for the program. When it came to any of the non-STEM aspects like language, economics, business, the STEM majors all ran like chickens with their heads cut off. I ended up tutoring most of them.

One of my favorite professors, a PhD in chemistry and one of the key members of the Mass EPA, once told me that STEM majors figure things out but social science/humanities majors know how get things done. The benefits of STEM majors are clear, but humanities and social sciences are meant to teach how to think, communicate, present, be diplomatic, and be confident in your opinions. And honestly, it's not like the hard sciences are doing much better in the job market right now. I went to a top university and know physics majors working at car dealerships and biology majors struggling to find $12 an hour tech jobs. In the long run they will most likely make more money than the average humanities or social science major, but I don't think that negates the importance of the latter majors.
User avatar
charolastra
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:37 pm UTC
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby Dark567 » Sat Jul 16, 2011 5:25 pm UTC

Jahoclave wrote:And I have to conquer with Bolshevik: If all you're doing is looking at people with a gaze of utility value you can fuck right off. If you judged everything by utility value a lot of pure science research wouldn't get funding and there's a lot of minority groups out there who live in a better world today in part because of programs like gender studies who did a hell of a lot of consciousness raising.
This doesn't make any sense to me. If something is doing consciousness raising or it its making minorities live in a better world, it has utility value.
I apologize, 90% of the time I write on the Fora I am intoxicated.


Yakk wrote:The question the thought experiment I posted is aimed at answering: When falling in a black hole, do you see the entire universe's future history train-car into your ass, or not?
Dark567
 
Posts: 3342
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:12 pm UTC
Location: Everywhere(in the US, I don't venture outside it too often, unfortunately)

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby B++ » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:11 pm UTC

Dark567 wrote:
Jahoclave wrote:And I have to conquer with Bolshevik: If all you're doing is looking at people with a gaze of utility value you can fuck right off. If you judged everything by utility value a lot of pure science research wouldn't get funding and there's a lot of minority groups out there who live in a better world today in part because of programs like gender studies who did a hell of a lot of consciousness raising.
This doesn't make any sense to me. If something is doing consciousness raising or it its making minorities live in a better world, it has utility value.


I think the point was that some people tend to judge majors solely by employment prospects and earning potential.

This thread reminds me of the College Confidential forum. That place is rife with majorism. You have 17 year-olds who "know" that money is the end-all-be-all goal in life and that your major decides the rest of your life. I always wonder if they realize that their teachers intentionally went into a career that pays a middle class salary. Around the board people tend to assume that they know all about other majors.

I'm not really majorist, and I don't really know about most majors (I will be a freshman this fall). Once I take a single introductory class then I will be qualified to judge the corresponding major :wink: .
User avatar
B++
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 5:41 pm UTC

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby Izawwlgood » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:38 pm UTC

KestrelLowing wrote:Not fewer - different.

I think this could rapidly spiral into a conversation about education reform, but suffice to say, I agree with some parts of this sentiment.

charolastra wrote: once told me that STEM majors figure things out but social science/humanities majors know how get things done.

I totally disagree with this.

Jahoclave wrote:And I have to conquer with Bolshevik

Everyone pillages with TGB. It's a fun bandwagon.
-I know this: if life is illusion, then I am no less an illusion, and being thus, the illusion is real to me. I live, I burn with life, I love, I slay, and am content.
-We can't go back. But I suppose we can go wherever we please.
User avatar
Izawwlgood
WINNING
 
Posts: 13926
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 3:55 pm UTC
Location: There may be lovelier lovelies...

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby gorcee » Sat Jul 16, 2011 11:18 pm UTC

B++ wrote:
Dark567 wrote:
Jahoclave wrote:And I have to conquer with Bolshevik: If all you're doing is looking at people with a gaze of utility value you can fuck right off. If you judged everything by utility value a lot of pure science research wouldn't get funding and there's a lot of minority groups out there who live in a better world today in part because of programs like gender studies who did a hell of a lot of consciousness raising.
This doesn't make any sense to me. If something is doing consciousness raising or it its making minorities live in a better world, it has utility value.


I think the point was that some people tend to judge majors solely by employment prospects and earning potential.

This thread reminds me of the College Confidential forum. That place is rife with majorism. You have 17 year-olds who "know" that money is the end-all-be-all goal in life and that your major decides the rest of your life. I always wonder if they realize that their teachers intentionally went into a career that pays a middle class salary. Around the board people tend to assume that they know all about other majors.

I'm not really majorist, and I don't really know about most majors (I will be a freshman this fall). Once I take a single introductory class then I will be qualified to judge the corresponding major :wink: .


When you're out in the field, though, this is how things go down. It's not about money, per se, it's about production.

You can live in a house without art on the wall or books on the shelves, but not without water in the pipes. Likewise, if a bridge collapses, no one is calling for the head of the poet who dedicated it; they're looking for the engineer who built it.

The humanities provide us with a valuable contribution to society, but in the end, our cities and towns can continue to operate if no new sculptures are commissioned next year. The same cannot be said when it comes to infrastructure and logistics.

Now, it is true that society operates using humanities majors. Government offices, banks, etc. are chock full of people who went to school for English or History or whatever. Nevertheless, the content of their majors and the content of their work probably has very little overlap. In contrast, although an engineer may never compute an integral in his entire career*, his entire profession is largely built upon a fundamental framework provided to him during his education.

You can say the same for humanities, but I would argue that there is a smaller overlap.


*this gets into a longer discussion regarding the one-to-one correlation of the things you do in school and the things you do out of school. Please do not be pedantic over this point, I am merely providing a brief, generalized statement regarding something that would require a much longer post to properly consider.
gorcee
 
Posts: 1501
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:14 am UTC
Location: Charlottesville, VA

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby Jahoclave » Sat Jul 16, 2011 11:45 pm UTC

B++ wrote:
Dark567 wrote:
Jahoclave wrote:And I have to conquer with Bolshevik: If all you're doing is looking at people with a gaze of utility value you can fuck right off. If you judged everything by utility value a lot of pure science research wouldn't get funding and there's a lot of minority groups out there who live in a better world today in part because of programs like gender studies who did a hell of a lot of consciousness raising.
This doesn't make any sense to me. If something is doing consciousness raising or it its making minorities live in a better world, it has utility value.


I think the point was that some people tend to judge majors solely by employment prospects and earning potential.

That. It was a two part response.

Izawwlgood wrote:
Jahoclave wrote:And I have to conquer with Bolshevik

Everyone pillages with TGB. It's a fun bandwagon.

You know, given my critical theoretical leanings, that whole screw up has levels of meaning that I find hilarious. And, to think, without a decent understanding of history and the humanities you couldn't even begin to comprehend them. Poor pure STEM folks who've decided that they will abolish all humanities knowledge from their brains because their can be only one field of knowledge!

That said, let's get the torches.

@Gorcee: You know, not all of a major is about what knowledge you know, but also about developing a fundamental skillset. And, really, given the current economic crises, finding people working dead end jobs they're overqualified for isn't hard. And quite frankly, most people with a college degree can do office work and even management. Now, I wonder what one of the most prevalent job types are in this country? You know where a good amount of engineers end up in their careers? Not doing engineering.

Until you're going to go around and do a comprehensive study on post-collegiate success rates of staying within the field and weight it accordingly, the whole argument is pretty baseless and working from pre-conceived stereotypes about the usefulness of the field.
User avatar
Jahoclave
sourmilk's moderator
 
Posts: 4679
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 8:34 pm UTC
Location: Springfield, MO

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby gmalivuk » Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:03 am UTC

gorcee wrote:The humanities provide us with a valuable contribution to society, but in the end, our cities and towns can continue to operate if no new sculptures are commissioned next year. The same cannot be said when it comes to infrastructure and logistics.
Sure, next year. But if there was no sculpture or art or cultural production at all, I strongly suspect that productivity would be far, far lower than it is today. All the people who actually do the day-to-day work in a society need something to make their lives worthwhile, and STEM graduates are rarely the ones providing those things.
In the future, there will be a global network of billions of adding machines.... One of the primary uses of this network will be to transport moving pictures of lesbian sex by pretending they are made out of numbers.
Spoiler:
gmss1 gmss2
User avatar
gmalivuk
Archduke Vendredi of Skellington the Third, Esquire
 
Posts: 19271
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
Location: Here, There, Everywhere (near Boston, anyway)

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby doogly » Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:22 am UTC

gmalivuk wrote: All the people who actually do the day-to-day work in a society need something to make their lives worthwhile, and STEM graduates are rarely the ones providing those things.

Nonsense!
-- Studying physics is a great way to have a worthwhile life. Even apart from the joy of study, I would be quite satisfied going for walks for all of my entertainment. This is actually pretty much what I do already. Walking is the shit, yo.
-- STEM majors have been known to provide love, good cheer and fucking. All three of these things! Now we're getting some seriously worthwhile life going on.
-- Academically produced "culture" is something that, while not worthless, would not really have too much trouble being replaced by pop and folk. I think we could deal.

Of course ,far, far be it from me to defend Gorcee. Shit be an idiot up in this thread. I think your counter went overboard though.
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.

Meaux: It's not jumping the shark if you never come down.
User avatar
doogly
Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
 
Posts: 3849
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
Location: Somerville, MA

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby gmalivuk » Sun Jul 17, 2011 6:42 am UTC

doogly wrote:Of course ,far, far be it from me to defend Gorcee. Shit be an idiot up in this thread. I think your counter went overboard though.
And a whole 33% of the points you made to counter my counter were good ones. Well done, sir!

I think, though, that what all reasonable people can agree on, is that it is clearly the people who studied *both* a STEM subject and one of the humanities, such as, just as random examples, math and philosophy or physics and classics, are the ones who should be in charge of things.
In the future, there will be a global network of billions of adding machines.... One of the primary uses of this network will be to transport moving pictures of lesbian sex by pretending they are made out of numbers.
Spoiler:
gmss1 gmss2
User avatar
gmalivuk
Archduke Vendredi of Skellington the Third, Esquire
 
Posts: 19271
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
Location: Here, There, Everywhere (near Boston, anyway)

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby doogly » Sun Jul 17, 2011 6:50 am UTC

I know. Please don't let my lack of critical thinking and persuasive writing reflect too poorly on Sciences and Humanities; if we let the Social Science types win it will disappoint me ever so sorely.
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.

Meaux: It's not jumping the shark if you never come down.
User avatar
doogly
Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
 
Posts: 3849
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
Location: Somerville, MA

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby Viae » Sun Jul 17, 2011 7:14 am UTC

Ooh, my A levels are maths, further maths history and latin. Does this mean I get to be one of the overlords?
The Mighty Thesaurus wrote:Also, I think your title should be "colossus", and I don't care if nobody agrees.
User avatar
Viae
 
Posts: 307
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:48 pm UTC
Location: Albion

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby gmalivuk » Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:20 pm UTC

Indeed. Here's your hat.
In the future, there will be a global network of billions of adding machines.... One of the primary uses of this network will be to transport moving pictures of lesbian sex by pretending they are made out of numbers.
Spoiler:
gmss1 gmss2
User avatar
gmalivuk
Archduke Vendredi of Skellington the Third, Esquire
 
Posts: 19271
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
Location: Here, There, Everywhere (near Boston, anyway)

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby Dark567 » Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:11 pm UTC

gmalivuk wrote: All the people who actually do the day-to-day work in a society need something to make their lives worthwhile, and STEM graduates are rarely the ones providing those things.
Video games.
I apologize, 90% of the time I write on the Fora I am intoxicated.


Yakk wrote:The question the thought experiment I posted is aimed at answering: When falling in a black hole, do you see the entire universe's future history train-car into your ass, or not?
Dark567
 
Posts: 3342
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:12 pm UTC
Location: Everywhere(in the US, I don't venture outside it too often, unfortunately)

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby The Mighty Thesaurus » Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:16 pm UTC

A rounded education is needed to make good video games (or a mixed team)
My games
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam
LE4dGOLEM wrote:your ability to tell things from things remains one of your skills.

Weeks wrote:Not only can you tell things from things, you can recognize when a thing is a thing
User avatar
The Mighty Thesaurus
a.k.a. The Puissant Lexicographical Tome
 
Posts: 4220
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 7:47 am UTC
Location: Drowning in an ocean of sorrow

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby gmalivuk » Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:21 pm UTC

Yeah. I'll believe "video games" as soon as someone gets me a list of popular video games that didn't have any artists or writers on staff.
In the future, there will be a global network of billions of adding machines.... One of the primary uses of this network will be to transport moving pictures of lesbian sex by pretending they are made out of numbers.
Spoiler:
gmss1 gmss2
User avatar
gmalivuk
Archduke Vendredi of Skellington the Third, Esquire
 
Posts: 19271
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
Location: Here, There, Everywhere (near Boston, anyway)

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby gorcee » Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:24 pm UTC

gmalivuk wrote:
gorcee wrote:The humanities provide us with a valuable contribution to society, but in the end, our cities and towns can continue to operate if no new sculptures are commissioned next year. The same cannot be said when it comes to infrastructure and logistics.
Sure, next year. But if there was no sculpture or art or cultural production at all, I strongly suspect that productivity would be far, far lower than it is today. All the people who actually do the day-to-day work in a society need something to make their lives worthwhile, and STEM graduates are rarely the ones providing those things.


I'm in complete agreement with you, which, if you actually read my post, you'd see. Notice how I said "next year" and not "for time immemorial." I'm really glad that you picked up on that phrase, and then completely missed the point.

My point is that STEM provides, in general, immediate and irreplaceable functionality in society. In a crisis, the humanities can wait. Of course, they cannot wait indefinitely.

A cheap analogy is that if you're underemployed and have only $500 to spend on your car, do you fix the transmission or install a stereo? STEM is the transmission, humanities are the stereo. Don't take this analogy too far. It's merely meant to illustrate the general point I was trying to make, not the overall efficacy of the entire body of humanities majors.

I do disagree that STEM graduates are rarely the ones producing those things. Most English majors don't become career novelists. Most art majors don't become career painters. Perhaps, they go on to work in the related industries: gallery operation, copywriting, whatever. But if your criteria for saying "rarely do STEM majors go on to create life-enriching things" is that rarely do engineers become sculptors or painters, I'd say then that rarely do humanities majors do the same.

I disagree in principle that STEM majors don't contribute to that, though. Engineers design TVs and sound systems and golf clubs and automobiles (go ahead, tell me that the automobile isn't art). These are all things that make our lives better, just as a painting by Dali or a poem by Tennyson make our lives better.

@doogly: I thought my post was fairly reasonable. If you think I was being an idiot, let me know why. If you think that I was implying that humanities majors are only good for operating government offices, I apologize, that's not what I meant. What I meant was that the world cannot operate for lack of humanities majors. Anecdote time: a good friend of mine works for a State gov't in a welfare-to-work program. She was a Anthro/Sociology major, and although she's not producing critical reviews of sociological efforts, her education does make her more compassionate and understanding (both economically and emotionally) of the socioeconomic situation of the people she counsels, and she excels at her job. Certainly, a mechanical engineer would not be capable of doing what she does.

@Jahoclave:
Jahoclave wrote:@Gorcee: You know, not all of a major is about what knowledge you know, but also about developing a fundamental skillset. And, really, given the current economic crises, finding people working dead end jobs they're overqualified for isn't hard. And quite frankly, most people with a college degree can do office work and even management. Now, I wonder what one of the most prevalent job types are in this country? You know where a good amount of engineers end up in their careers? Not doing engineering.


Engineers not doing engineering are not called engineers. They're called "former Engineering majors." Likewise, Engineering students are not engineers. They are students.

Now you can claim that most graduated engineering students working in engineering "aren't doing engineering," but I call bullshit on that. Actual, real world engineering bears little in common with what you do in school. There's an old story about a company that hired a bright young engineer straight out of college. There he was, with his 4.0 GPA, and he showed up to the office on his first day and said, "here I am, send me your differential equations to be solved!"

What you learn in college for engineering is essentially just a bunch of how to apply facts to come up with solutions to problems. All of what you learn in engineering school is designed to develop this mentality and base it on a sound foundation of theory. Engineering students spend their nights doing things like drawing Bode plots by hand. This is an important thing to learn, even if you'll never do it again for the rest of your career.

The funny thing is, Jahoclave, that despite the fact that there are lots of people overqualified for their work due to the economy, the real picture is somewhat more complicated. Actually, at various points of the economic crisis, both job openings AND unemployment went up. And what were those job openings in? STEM.

http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2011/0304/Jobs-go-unfilled-despite-high-unemployment

While there are more than 25 job seekers for every open position in fields like construction, the exact inverse is true in technology, health and science-related jobs.

For computer science jobs and skilled health care practitioners, there were just over three ads for every job seeker in February. For life sciences jobs like medical science researchers and chemists, the ratio was 2 to 1.



EDIT (to merge successive posts):

gmalivuk wrote:Yeah. I'll believe "video games" as soon as someone gets me a list of popular video games that didn't have any artists or writers on staff.


No. You said,

All the people who actually do the day-to-day work in a society need something to make their lives worthwhile, and STEM graduates are rarely the ones providing those things.


You made no claim of exclusivity. Video games can exist without programmers about as well as they can exist without artists and writers. For video games, STEM graduates produce a fair share of the creation effort. For instance, at the upcoming PAXDev, there are (so far) 8 scheduled panels under the Art discipline, and 9 under the Programming discipline. http://dev.paxsite.com/schedule_disc.php
gorcee
 
Posts: 1501
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:14 am UTC
Location: Charlottesville, VA

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby doogly » Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:33 pm UTC

Also, I am appointing myself team captain for science, and forbidding all use of anecdotes in the rest of this discussion. Seriously, we are not going to make our case effectively by denying that which makes us strong.
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.

Meaux: It's not jumping the shark if you never come down.
User avatar
doogly
Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
 
Posts: 3849
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
Location: Somerville, MA

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby gorcee » Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:38 pm UTC

doogly wrote:Also, I am appointing myself team captain for science, and forbidding all use of anecdotes in the rest of this discussion. Seriously, we are not going to make our case effectively by denying that which makes us strong.


Despite my use of anecdote (which I used not to illustrate the general state of affairs of the world, but to clarify my opinion, which I felt I communicated poorly), why do you think I'm an idiot?
gorcee
 
Posts: 1501
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:14 am UTC
Location: Charlottesville, VA

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby Viae » Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:41 pm UTC

Note: your reasons for gorcee being an idiot must also be anecdote free. Also preferably peer reviewed.
The Mighty Thesaurus wrote:Also, I think your title should be "colossus", and I don't care if nobody agrees.
User avatar
Viae
 
Posts: 307
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:48 pm UTC
Location: Albion

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby gorcee » Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:43 pm UTC

Viae wrote:Note: your reasons for gorcee being an idiot must also be anecdote free. Also preferably peer reviewed.


I'll save the suspense: most of my peers think I'm an idiot, too.
gorcee
 
Posts: 1501
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:14 am UTC
Location: Charlottesville, VA

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby TheGrammarBolshevik » Sun Jul 17, 2011 7:36 pm UTC

gorcee wrote:I do disagree that STEM graduates are rarely the ones producing those things. Most English majors don't become career novelists. Most art majors don't become career painters. Perhaps, they go on to work in the related industries: gallery operation, copywriting, whatever. But if your criteria for saying "rarely do STEM majors go on to create life-enriching things" is that rarely do engineers become sculptors or painters, I'd say then that rarely do humanities majors do the same.

It isn't. You're talking about P(artist|STEM major), but the relevant figure is P(STEM major|artist).
#xkcd-q — a pretty neat LGBTQIQ channel on Foonetic

"Grant me chastity and continence, but not yet." —St. Augustine

Ceterum autem censeo, Yalensem esse delendam.
User avatar
TheGrammarBolshevik
waldo waldorf waldron waldron's wale waler wales waley walfish walford walgreen walhalla
 
Posts: 4257
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 2:12 am UTC
Location: Where.

Re: Are you Major-ist?

Postby gorcee » Sun Jul 17, 2011 7:52 pm UTC

TheGrammarBolshevik wrote:
gorcee wrote:I do disagree that STEM graduates are rarely the ones producing those things. Most English majors don't become career novelists. Most art majors don't become career painters. Perhaps, they go on to work in the related industries: gallery operation, copywriting, whatever. But if your criteria for saying "rarely do STEM majors go on to create life-enriching things" is that rarely do engineers become sculptors or painters, I'd say then that rarely do humanities majors do the same.

It isn't. You're talking about P(artist|STEM major), but the relevant figure is P(STEM major|artist).


I don't at all follow your logic. Gmalivuk was talking about the rarity of STEM majors going on and doing things that are life-enriching. I was questioning what he meant by that. If his intent was to say, "STEM majors rarely write novels, paint pictures, sculpt sculptures, and sing songs" then sure. The number of graduates of STEM programs that go on to do those things is pretty small. I'm not at all debating that.

But I also wanted to say that overall, most English, Classics, History, Art, whatever majors also don't go on to do those things. So, if that's what he meant by saying that rarely do STEM majors go on to create life-enriching things, then I counter that by saying that frankly, rarely do Humanities majors go on to create those kinds of life enriching things, so that facet of a pragmatic analysis of the major is washed out.

So I suppose I am talk about P(artist|STEM), but I don't see how P(STEM|artist) comes into play at all. I'm not at all talking about the likelihood, frequency, necessity or success of artists in STEM majors/jobs.

Instead, I'm saying that P(artist|STEM) and P(artist|Humanities), when normalized by student population, is probably pretty close.
gorcee
 
Posts: 1501
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:14 am UTC
Location: Charlottesville, VA

PreviousNext

Return to School

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron