scotty2haughty wrote:Socks.
I finish my laundry and have 5 different types of socks, none of which match.
Standard socks would be nice. The only problem is I can't go out and buy a bunch of socks to make my standard because then I will end up with 6 different types of socks...
When you set a universal standard, you discard the existing standards.
The same applies to socks. Next time you need more socks, buy about 10 pairs of identical socks and throw old ones out. That's what I do. No need to ever sort my socks. Never more than one odd sock.
Since I'm wearing them in random order, they get about the same amount of wear, so when they start to wear thin It's time to replace all of them at once. With another 10 pairs of identical socks.
Khorbin wrote:I recently threw away all of my old types of socks I'd built up over the last 15 years or so, regardless of their state of wear and tear, and replaced them all with a single, standard brand. Best. Decision. Of. My. Life.
I still had to buy white socks and black socks, and short white and long white, for example, but I can visually identify that two socks go together now, which is amazing. AND if I pick three random socks from my white pile, for example, by the pigeonhole principle I have at least one matching pair. Plus I get to think about the pigeonhole principle every time I do that. Win-win-win.
I don't have any white socks, but I don't have any white sneakers either.
On the other hand, I do have one pair a different size and color than the others. A very thick and comfy pair I don't usually wear outside. But it'd be pretty hard to get them mixed up with my regular socks.
myoilu wrote:btw suprised no one noticed yet... the forum link's back.
Holy carp, I didn't even notice. So used to typing it in manually by now that I didn't even stop to check.