Moderators: jestingrabbit, Moderators General, Prelates
You made me laugh so hard. This game is so personal...roband wrote:I've about had enough of this tbh.
First of all, I had no idea if webby was spy, so I didn't really care if anyone thought we were connected. Second, the reactions to it could be potentially useful - Webby tried to downplay it, and you jumped on it. But mainly, at the time, we were considering trying to get a spy/resistance pair by giving the plot power to cjdrum. I don't think that would have been useful, so I was trying to get you to see the other side of it. I don't know that it worked, but we did end up getting a claimed town on mpolo. Unfortunately webby went from least scummy to most scummy so it doesn't help as much as it could have. Basically, I'm satisfied with the results of typing out that winey paragraph, except for your suspicion.Adam H wrote:I think best play is to get open up to be used on two towny people who have been opposing each other. I think in order to win, we will need to make potentially flawed assuptions and hope for the best. Suppose I used open up on webby, and webby confirmed I was town. I can't imagine you would assume we are both spies, cause we've been sniping unnecessarily at each other for much of the game. Plus, webby (somewhat randomly) said I was less scummy than vector. That's not something one spy would say about another... So hopefully we'll get some small confirmation that they are both town. I realize that a confirmed town isn't really a confirmed town... but still.
At the point that I submitted the instructions to jay, we were on the first proposal, and I wanted to ensure that I had some input with the way the teams were set up. If we had rejected a few mission proposals, I basically made sure that I would be included on the team (therefore increasing the towniness), because you couldn't afford for me to be the lone town rejection on top of the spies. I also thought that it might taunt the spies into rejecting the 4th or even 5th mission - I would have been back without them knowing, so I could accept the mission and catch 4 rejection votes when it made no sense for them to reject. Either I'm on the team or maybe we catch the spies. It was a long shot, but it seemed worth it.Misnomer wrote:His instructions for teams in his absense worry me, especially given his intention to reject any team he isn't on personally and to withhold using eye altogether if certain people aren't on the team.
Do you mean 'neither mpolo and BF is spy'?Adam H wrote:For the record, I'd prefer myself, misnomer, and mpolo/BF. I'm not sure that there's much of a difference between mpolo and BF, but there's a sort of decent chance that either mpolo and BF is spy, I think.
Van wrote:Fireballs don't lie.
Gopher of Pern wrote:....Establish Confidence, which can only confirm town if the leader is the one who is suspicious...
Freaking Roband throwing his NC card at the worst possible time! I think it's safe to say that Roband is both the schlemiel and schlemazel in this game.Gopher of Pern wrote:Thats why I would have preferred Lorenz to get the powers, so we could confirm them.
No, I meant either. By "decent chance" I mean that right now I'd put it at maybe 30% that one of them is a spy. Something like 13% BF, 13% mpolo, and 4% both. I just don't want them both on the team. I'm actually a lot more suspicious of BF now because of how he proposed the last mission team. Not because I didn't like the mission team, but because from his perspective I would have thought he would have really wanted it to be accepted. Maybe he doesn't actually trust me, but from my perspective he really should have wanted to go on that mission. How would you feel about webby on the next team? I might be leaning that way.VectorZero wrote:Do you mean 'neither mpolo and BF is spy'?Adam H wrote:For the record, I'd prefer myself, misnomer, and mpolo/BF. I'm not sure that there's much of a difference between mpolo and BF, but there's a sort of decent chance that either mpolo and BF is spy, I think.
So what do you want to do? Accept Lorenz's team? I don't think it's worth the risk. It's unfortunate that we have 2 powers that we do not want spies to have and 1 power that we do. I say we wait and see what cj and roband propose before making a decision. There's a 50% chance that we won't get the EC this round anyways. Cjdrum handing out the strong leaders is going to mess with our heads a freaking ton.Gopher of Pern wrote:Establish confidence is the only power which can out a spy or confirm town. But it needs to be given out by a mission leader who we aren't sure of. If Misnomer gets it, we'll lose the last decent power we have.
Hold off until we can talk a bit more about it - Misnomer might be right that we should give cj the plot powers. Since I know that misnomer isn't pushing a spy agenda, I'm inclined to at least listen... The deadline isn't for another 2 days anyways.Lorenz wrote:...
Any reasons for me not to do this?
Wrong. Consider: no one else is... the spies don't have to be desperate right now. I do.Misnomer wrote:@Adam H: Sorry, none of this is personal - but the problem is, if you were a spy, you'd still be saying the exact same things now to try and convince me of your towniness.
Van wrote:Fireballs don't lie.
webby wrote:I just realised we had a sign of life from cjdrum - he accepted the last mission proposal.
I'm trying to work out how bad two strong leaders would be in scum's hands. It's a loss with five consecutive rejections. From my perspective, we lose if Boomfrog, Lorenz and cjdrum are scum (cjdrum gives one strong leader to Boomfrog, one to the spy not in those three). That's not worth the risk, so I think I'll reject this at least one more time - I might accept cjdrum's team given roband is confirmed resistance to me.
VectorZero wrote:Given we need three townies and cannot afford any more losses, I don't think we can put either webby or BF on mission 1. At least one of them is scum.
Lorenz wrote:
Yeah, I noticed as well. It looks like mod is looking for a replacement anyhow. I don´t know what to make of your statement, from your perspective we lose if my team is accepted and I'm scum and Bf and cjdrum? From anybodies perspective we lose if I'm scum and my team is accepted. I feel like I'm missing you point. Explain?
mpolo wrote:I'm back. I have to admit that the strategy involved in rejecting teams that we like to get the plot powers into the right hands is giving me headaches.
mpolo wrote:Is that about right? We need to reject on Lorenz and cjdrum, and then see if we can accept roband's team?
mpolo wrote:I'm back. I have to admit that the strategy involved in rejecting teams that we like to get the plot powers into the right hands is giving me headaches. Which is not to say that it's not the right thing to to -- it's pretty clear that we have to keep certain powers out of scum's hands, but it's giving me headaches trying to figure out what the best thing to do is. I will try to reason this out:
We just had BoomFrog propose and fail due to (planned) no confidence.
We're waiting for a proposal from Lorenz.
We don't want cjdrum to get powers, so we have to reject his team.
Both cjdrum and roband are pretty untrusted, so we don't want to accept cjdrum's team (getting powers to roband).
So roband is going to make the fourth proposal. It is possible that he would suggest something acceptable, especially if under pressure, but he might pull a scummy team to force the fourth rejection, in which case Adam would have to propose a universally acceptable team and Misnomer would get powers.
Is that about right? We need to reject on Lorenz and cjdrum, and then see if we can accept roband's team?
There's no reason to guess how many spies were on the first mission. If there were 2 spies on mission 1 + an unknown GoP, GoP has as much chance to be spy as anyone, I believe. FINE I'll try and do the math... we selected the team at random: 90 combos with 2 spies, 25 combos with 3/4 spies. That's 22% chance of 3 spies, given that there are at least 2 spies. Since there's 2 spies out of the entire 8 non-spy people, that's 25% chance for everyone else. I think. So it's 22% vs. 25%, assuming I did that right (which isn't a safe assumption...). But surely it's close.Lorenz wrote:If VZ is scum, GoP is very close to resistance as it gets, unless you think there were 3 spies on mission 1.
So if mpolo and misnomer go on a mission, we might as well send GoP.
Your scenario is possible. It's more likely that there are 2 spies next each other, and if the first spy gets both SL's they can reject 4 times in a row. Then we'll have to accept the first mission proposal for each of the last 2 missions, and hope that both those leaders are town. Hopefully the spies will not want to out themselves, but there's a chance that they can get away with it. For instance, if the spies are VZ, webby, cj, and roband, cj would give both strong leaders to VZ, then roband can propose a spy filled mission, and we lose.webby wrote:I'm trying to work out how bad two strong leaders would be in scum's hands. It's a loss with five consecutive rejections. From my perspective, we lose if Boomfrog, Lorenz and cjdrum are scum (cjdrum gives one strong leader to Boomfrog, one to the spy not in those three). That's not worth the risk, so I think I'll reject this at least one more time - I might accept cjdrum's team given roband is confirmed resistance to me.
Silas wrote:Nobody who gets paid by the hour invents a cotton gin.
We can't all be spies since I'm not a spy.Misnomer wrote:Of course, we hit the same problem that we're screwed if cjdrum, roband and Adam are all spies
Actually I was on the last misson, but your point stands.Adam H wrote:We can't all be spies since I'm not a spy.Misnomer wrote:Of course, we hit the same problem that we're screwed if cjdrum, roband and Adam are all spiesBut seriously, we can't all be spies since there are 2 spies from the last mission team, which did not include cjdrum, roband, and myself. And lorenz and you, for that matter.
If.If you're going to trust me completely, you should trust me completely as the leader.
Not true. If we're accepting a team that we're expecting you to NC, and if you are not on this team, it make sense. If you are town, you'll do your duty and NC it. If you're scum, then we can expect you to NC if the team has a chance of success. The only reason why you, as scum, would not NC would be if there was scum on the team - and tbh, if 2 out of you, mpolo and boomfrog are spies, then we're screwed anyway.And if you're accepting a team, expecting me to NC, you are trusting completely all the members of the team, AND me. So I'm not sure that is rational behavior by the accepters.
Yeah, my last point was stupidly wrong.Misnomer wrote:Not true.
Adam H wrote:There's no reason to guess how many spies were on the first mission. If there were 2 spies on mission 1 + an unknown GoP, GoP has as much chance to be spy as anyone, I believe. FINE I'll try and do the math... we selected the team at random: 90 combos with 2 spies, 25 combos with 3/4 spies. That's 22% chance of 3 spies, given that there are at least 2 spies. Since there's 2 spies out of the entire 8 non-spy people, that's 25% chance for everyone else. I think. So it's 22% vs. 25%, assuming I did that right (which isn't a safe assumption...). But surely it's close.
Adam H wrote:We can't all be spies since I'm not a spy.Misnomer wrote:Of course, we hit the same problem that we're screwed if cjdrum, roband and Adam are all spiesBut seriously, we can't all be spies since there are 2 spies from the last mission team, which did not include cjdrum, roband, and myself. And lorenz and you, for that matter.
I'd prefer to plan on rejecting as many as you guys can stomach. That way if ANY of the proposals are accepted unexpectantly, I can NC it (and we can grill the accepters).
If we accept a team, we're completely trusting all three of the members of the team. It is a suboptimal choice to put me on the mission team rather than letting me be the fifth leader, because only good things can come from rejecting as many missions as possible. If you're going to trust me completely, you should trust me completely as the leader. And while it's likely that mpolo, misnomer, and BF are all resistance, I'm not willing to bet the game on it. I think it's more rational for everyone to bet the game on just me, rather than on mpolo AND misnomer AND BF.
And if you're accepting a team, expecting me to NC, you are trusting completely all the members of the team, AND me. So I'm not sure that is rational behavior by the accepters.
Oooooo I just had an unrelated thought - what if cjdrum sent a pm to jay a while ago preaccepting any mission with a spy on it.Seems like there's a good chance that last vote was a contigency vote rather than an active one... Or I guess he got mod-prodded, and voted at the same time he told jay he didn't want to play anymore. eh.
Lorenz wrote:And I will accept. I trust my logic and VZ is looking especially scummy for not making any strong accusations against mpolo/misnomer... from his point of view one of the should definitely be a spy.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests