Moderators: jestingrabbit, Moderators General, Prelates
existential_elevator wrote:I think that if Lorenz shows up scum, Roband and Lorenz are a scum team.
...
I think Roband may be pushing for a teammate lynch to earn him points, and then hoping that if he tries hard enough to associate us, town will blindly follow and lynch me. If you read back, Roband was also accusing me of buddying him. I felt too much like he was trying to distance himself from Lorenz.
existential_elevator wrote:I think Roband may be pushing for a teammate lynch to earn him points
existential_elevator wrote:Roband, we've basically agreed on most things since the very startWe misread eachother a few times, yes.
roband wrote:Webby, would you conisder a lynch on e_e and an investigation on Lorenz?
The fact he's happy to be investigated weirds me out a bit. Scum wanting to stay alive just a bit longer, or town 0wanting to be a confirmed townie?
Investigating e_e would be good enough for me, because if she's scum we can lynch her tomorrow.
greenlover wrote:Well, I'm feeling pretty good about lynching E_E, but I won't vote her yet, as we still have time.
I don't feel that investigating Lorenz is a good idea ('cause I doubt he is scum), but w/e. There is a lot of wine around him, so I see how he could be considered a good target.
If he's got wine around him, that's all the more reason to investigate him - we'll swiftly get an answer one way or the other, and won't have to spend the rest of the game worrying about its significance.greenlover wrote:There is a lot of wine around him, so I see how he could be considered a good target.
I'm not saying that his eagerness to be investigated couldn't be a trick. Its just that his reaction in general strikes me as a towny who has been deflated. He could still be scum, but I am no where near as sure of it as I was before. So, I think that there are probably better targets for investigation.roband wrote:However, I think (from playing with him previously) he's smart enough to try and pull a trick like this, as scum.
Exactly. The major reason I see for investigating him is to clear up the wine. That's what I said (or, I guess, meant to say).Misnomer wrote:If he's got wine around him, that's all the more reason to investigate him - we'll swiftly get an answer one way or the other, and won't have to spend the rest of the game worrying about its significance.greenlover wrote:There is a lot of wine around him, so I see how he could be considered a good target.
cjdrum wrote:Lorenz (3): Ibarra, webby
greenlover wrote:Well, I'm feeling pretty good about lynching E_E, but I won't vote her yet, as we still have time.
I don't feel that investigating Lorenz is a good idea ('cause I doubt he is scum), but w/e. There is a lot of wine around him, so I see how he could be considered a good target.
John Citizen wrote:Ibarra feels somewhat scummy for bringing up the votes to L-1, where scum could easily hammer.
Ibarra wrote:This looks like you're making an excuse to vote e_e later. If someone is more suspicious than the reset for you then vote them.
a-wan wrote:I didn't suspect Lorenz at all until the "sudden realization" about e_e without any explanation as to what he thought the scum tells were.
One thought is this. It seems possible that if one of e_e or Lorenz is scum then so is the other. The problem is that if they're both scum, I think they're on the same team, so if we lynch one of them, we might want to consider investigating someone else so that we can hunt down a different scum team.
Roband wrote:This screams of "oh-god-they-caught-my-partner-I-better-not-associate-myself". Congratulations, you're next on my scum list
existential_elevator wrote:a-wan gives me a strong townie vibe.
I'm neutral on Lorenz.
Misnomer makes me uncomfortable.
existential_elevator wrote:Well, okay, unless Greenlover objects, that's kind of all I need to prove that one of Misnomer, Greenlover, or a-wan is scum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest