Gopher of Pern wrote:cjdrum, all you've done is enquire as to how experienced Paimon is
Gopher of Pern wrote:I will also consider greenlover, but will wait for them to reply to a-wans accusation.
I've had quite a bit of experience mostly online here and there, but also a bit IRL.cjdrum wrote:Paimon: How much experience of Mafia have you had, whether it be online or in... the real world?
I started reading through under the assumption that you had no experience, but you seem to know what you're talking about. So yeah, it'd be good to know how much you know and how you know it
Misnomer wrote:Mod: is there any softlynching in this game? Is a minimum number of votes required, or is it simple plurality lynching? And what happens in the event of a tie?
Adam H wrote:Vote: No Lynch
Sigh... this is what I've been concerned about since you DECIDED there shall be no NL (in a big booming God voice), when really we should have decided that there will be no deciding. I thought webby showed that it's basically a wash whether we should lynch or not. The main reason not to NL is that it would kill discussion. Well, my NL vote is getting the discussion going! So I'm not sure what the scumminess is in that...Misnomer wrote:Unvote
Vote: Adam HAdam H wrote:Vote: No Lynch
Explain this. Now.
some weird stuff?!?! no real good content!?!??webby wrote:Adam H - New player, a few questions etc. that imply he doesn't know what's going on. Says it would seem more suspicious if he did know what was going on (at least that's how I interpret it). An odd post where he votes for No Lynch, after previously saying he would agree with a-wan if he said we shouldn't decide to No Lynch? Overall - some weird stuff, no real good content yet. Slightly Scummy.
Agreed. But that wasn't my defense... I was not acting scummy, BECAUSE I was promoting discussion. Voting NL is not scummy - limiting content is scummy. You falsely assumed that voting NL limits content. Or maybe you think it is scummy to play differently/unusually, in which case, I can't help that because I'm obviously going to play differently from you guys. Everything I have said and done is something that a town would have said and done (i don't necessarily expect you to believe that at this point, but once I'm out of the game you will), and maybe next game you'll have gotten a feel for my playing style. But if I try and blend in with you guys I'm just going to look lurky and scummy, so I choose to be myself instead.Misnomer wrote:'I was acting scummy to provoke discussion' is never a valid defence.
Geez, is changing your mind when someone points out the flaw in your logic the latest scum tell? And besides, do you really think I'm such a bad mafia player to drop such an obvious scum tell as yes-manning? I'm starting to think that a-wan just wants to lynch me for the heck of it . But I digress. After all, he is giving me incentive to be active in this game.a-wan wrote:greenlover only has two posts, one at the beginning where he says a D1 NL is a good idea, and one much later when he sees that his post made him look suspicious and he claims to have changed his mind because agreed with webby, though he didn't actually say that at the time.
roband wrote:8. You may not post game content during ‘The Trick’. ‘The Trick’ begins when the aforementioned deadline is reached, a majority vote is cast or when the mod says so. Posting content after a deadline is against the rules.
[17:48] robphone can someone do me a favour and call night in my game when applicable please? im stuck somwherr with no internet and vsry poor phone signal
I regret mislynching, but I don't regret having the top two people on my scum list being made public knowledge. Adam H was an unfortunate case of a new player seeming more scummy than town, but having a jester high on the scum list can hardly be considered damning.Gopher of Pern wrote:Paimon bandwagonned onto the Adam lynch, hasn't discussed alot so far, and had 2 known townies up the top of their scumlist.
Users browsing this forum: jimbobmacdoodle and 2 guests