Moderators: Moderators General, Magistrates, Prelates
Shivahn wrote:Feddlefew wrote:How should I explain to people the difference between Androgynous and Bisexual / Transsexual / Asexual? I don't care that I'm biologically female or being referred to as a she, but I have a hard time thinking of myself as a "girl" in the traditional sense.
I'm not quite sure I understand the question. Can you just define each one so that the difference is obvious? I mean, something along the lines of "bisexual people are attracted to people of both (binary) genders," and "androgynous people identify as neither strictly male or female," and so on?
It may confuse others because what you've described sounds a lot like being a straight female. You might find "straight female who isn't feminine" to be a short and clear description that communicates what you want (with perhaps a "traditionally" thrown in front of the feminine).Feddlefew wrote:The part that seems to throw people off is that I do not find other females physically attractive, while still finding males attractive.
Feddlefew wrote: the teacher asks you to provide a "woman's point of view" on something. Just because I am female does not mean I can give a perspective on how women approach every day life.
Vaniver wrote:It may confuse others because what you've described sounds a lot like being a straight female. You might find "straight female who isn't feminine" to be a short and clear description that communicates what you want (with perhaps a "traditionally" thrown in front of the feminine).Feddlefew wrote:The part that seems to throw people off is that I do not find other females physically attractive, while still finding males attractive.
doogly wrote:On a scale of Mr Rogers to Fascism, how mean do you think we're being?
Belial wrote:My goal is to be the best brain infection any of you have ever had.
The Mighty Thesaurus wrote:I can tell from his word choice that he is using his penis to type.
Steax wrote:I think the courts are kinda busy right now. Something about cake and due process.
Won't that imply masculinity to most people?animeHrmIne wrote:Still transgender
The usefulness of categories is that they allow people to apply preconceived notions. Not knowing how to respond or act in a situation is awkward and unpleasant. Note that you only have access to notions the other person has preconceived, and so knowing your audience is helpful. It may be a better strategy to use verbs than adjectives- "I am a girl, I like boys, I don't care much about being a girl or girl stereotypes." Then, rather than trying to explain fine distinctions (no, I don't identify as androgynous because of X) you can quickly access the interesting differences.animeHrmIne wrote:they have a preconceived notion of what that means that you may not follow; people in general may have not heard "female genderqueer", so you get to be the example that makes them understand.
Jessica wrote:Hmmm, should I get this shirt?
kinigget wrote:See, I never used to believe in ghosts, that was until I started encountering them. I am what you would call "sensitive" to the supernatural, and before you go writing me off as silly and/or crazy let me explain something: I fully believe that the supernatural can be explained by scientific methods, we just don't know how yet. Which brings me to my actual subject: As I have stated here before I am at least transgendered and quite likely transsexual. What I wonder about is whether and how transitioning will affect my sensitivity. Now I know that I'm quite likely the only one here who cares at all about any of this, but, you know, for SCIENCE!
Feddlefew wrote:How should I explain to people the difference between Androgynous and Bisexual / Transsexual / Asexual? I don't care that I'm biologically female or being referred to as a she, but I have a hard time thinking of myself as a "girl" in the traditional sense.
existential_elevator wrote:It's like a jigsaw puzzle of Hitler pissing on Mother Theresa. No individual piece is offensive, but together...
If you think hot women have it easy because everyone wants to have sex at them, you're both wrong and also the reason you're wrong.

DaBigCheez wrote:And if she needs anything, she can snap her fingers and I'm there(I'm not always *competent* in my attempts to help, and fail at comprehending her sometimes, but it works out in the end!)
Do it! It might be fun, and you might meet worthwhile people.Bassoon wrote:It's really hard to convince myself that I should go to the LGBT/Allies kick-off event my university's GSA is having.
doogly wrote:On a scale of Mr Rogers to Fascism, how mean do you think we're being?
Belial wrote:My goal is to be the best brain infection any of you have ever had.
Kilroy(ZTC) wrote:I don't know what good it does to post this, for me or for anyone, but I've come to admit to myself that even now I want to be a man and not a woman. And not for healthy reasons, and in spite of the knowledge that I fundamentally can't be. I just feel cheated. I was told I would "outgrow it", and people drew huge debts from me in the name of facilitating this, inflicting irreparable injury. I was promised that I would be a man and that promise justified a quarter of a lifetime of pain (and undoubtedly more to come), and gave me the means and motive to tolerate it and push through it. Learning to do that shaped me in a fundamental way. It accounts for my withdrawn and generally stoical nature, which I have tried to undo desperately and repeatedly but without success. It imbued me with the sort of discipline that I call upon daily just to continue to live; and knowing that said discipline comes, fundamentally, from a place of self-hatred and self-destruction leaves me conflicted even in the act of survival. I don't know how to reverse it or build it on a different foundation, so I wonder if maybe I would be more free and authentic if I simply resolved to starve to death or die of exposure on the street, since then I would be rid of it at least. I'm not sure what there is to be said about this, productive or not, so I assume any comment on the subject will be a surprise.
Vaniver wrote:Harvard is a hedge fund that runs the most prestigious dating agency in the world, and incidentally employs famous scientists to do research.
afuzzyduck wrote:ITS MEANT TO BE FLUTTERSHY BUT I JUST SEE AAERIELE! CURSE YOU FORA!
Rakysh wrote:Basically, xkcd is basically for punching into submission the dumb frat guy in your brain.
Vaniver wrote:Harvard is a hedge fund that runs the most prestigious dating agency in the world, and incidentally employs famous scientists to do research.
afuzzyduck wrote:ITS MEANT TO BE FLUTTERSHY BUT I JUST SEE AAERIELE! CURSE YOU FORA!
Aaeriele wrote:In 2 more hours, I should theoretically be allowed to sit up. Theoretically.
No, I'm not counting the minutes.
Yes, I'm counting the seconds.
Edit: Oh god that shower was glorious. Utterly exhausted me, but was glorious.
sillybear25 wrote:But it's NPH, so it's creepy in the best possible way.
Shivahn wrote:I'm in your abstractions, burning your notions of masculinity.
Update from Amber (dictation taken by Ben): Yesterday they took out the IV hookup in her left hand, since there was some kind of problem with it (apparently). Today, they decided to set up a new IV hookup in her right hand for the rest of her stay. It hurt worse than anything else has so far, and she's understandably not at all pleased about it. Plus, now both her hands are sore, hence why I'm typing this. Thankfully, only 1-1.5 more days in the hospital.
Vaniver wrote:Harvard is a hedge fund that runs the most prestigious dating agency in the world, and incidentally employs famous scientists to do research.
afuzzyduck wrote:ITS MEANT TO BE FLUTTERSHY BUT I JUST SEE AAERIELE! CURSE YOU FORA!
Oregonaut wrote:You are a fucking idiot. (Insult.)
You say that you disapprove of sex before marriage, but you are fucking that idiot. (Ad hominem.)
You say that you disapprove of sex outside of marriage, but you are fucking your mom. (Ad mominem.)
sillybear25 wrote:But it's NPH, so it's creepy in the best possible way.
Shivahn wrote:I'm in your abstractions, burning your notions of masculinity.
Feddlefew wrote:Shivahn wrote:Feddlefew wrote:How should I explain to people the difference between Androgynous and Bisexual / Transsexual / Asexual? I don't care that I'm biologically female or being referred to as a she, but I have a hard time thinking of myself as a "girl" in the traditional sense.
I'm not quite sure I understand the question. Can you just define each one so that the difference is obvious? I mean, something along the lines of "bisexual people are attracted to people of both (binary) genders," and "androgynous people identify as neither strictly male or female," and so on?
That's what I usually do. There is probably a better word than androgynous, because I do identify as female (sex), just not as feminine or masculine (gender). The part that seems to throw people off is that I do not find other females physically attractive, while still finding males attractive.
It gets uncomfortable when you're one of two females in the room during a class discussion on the early feminist movement and the teacher asks you to provide a "woman's point of view" on something. Just because I am female does not mean I can give a perspective on how women approach every day life.
NecklaceOfShadow wrote:I'd really like to start reading farther into formal gender studies and criticism, so I'd appreciate suggestions on authors and works to request from them.

Vaniver wrote:Harvard is a hedge fund that runs the most prestigious dating agency in the world, and incidentally employs famous scientists to do research.
afuzzyduck wrote:ITS MEANT TO BE FLUTTERSHY BUT I JUST SEE AAERIELE! CURSE YOU FORA!
Users browsing this forum: Bakstoola, Farpappestals, Frulkyerurl, GuetraGma, Illinyintog, KegoPrure, lulvassyTraro, SlefBalia, Ubik and 9 guests