Sruixan wrote:If Misnomer were scum and wanted to fake a failure, would he have explicitly said he received notification or not, taking a 50-50 gamble?
...no, not exactly? I mean yes, were you to follow suit, there would have been two outcomes; Misnomer posted the right thing, you copy, you look good, OR Misnomer posted the wrong thing to see if he could catch people out, you say the wrong thing, he calls you out. We reach a familiar scenario; you could have then said that you were merely trying to continue the falsehood to catch scum out, or you could have said he was the one who was wrong and we'd be in the exact same place we are now with the roles reversed by oh gog that was a ridiculously long and unclear hypothetical that did absolutely nothing to make me happier with the idea of you being scum well done me.a-wan wrote:If I'm scum, then wouldn't I know that Misnomer got it right and just follow suit?
It's fine, but not foolproof, because you assume you would have been blocked because it was obvious who you were going to target. You had to assume. With Misnomer, you didn't. So why did you not switch to a from-your-point-of-view certain mafioso? Am I missing something?
If I'm scum, then wouldn't I know that Misnomer got it right and just follow suit?
...I really need to stop making these posts in bed, because I never get the chance to actually sit there and think about it. As far as I'm concerned, though, despite Lorenz saying that receiving notification of a failed action is "farfetched", I'm wondering what I would do in EP's shoes and to be honest unless I fancied having a handful of rather bemused people asking whether or not I forgot their action, I'd probably tell them. It's the sort of info you'd think we'd oughta get as well; Minsomer would never have known that his supposed kill had actually failed if he hadn't been told, given that he targeted the otherwise deceased jayhsu. I probably should stop trying to read the mod's mind, but at least you can see where I'm coming from, right?
The lack of input from softchews is beginning to get annoying
If I'm scum then:
1. Misnomer is town
2. Lorenz is town
3. softchews is town
4. Sruixan is town (he didn't say this, of course, but it's implied)
Well yes, that is exactly what I was really rather hoping for and was trying not to state outright so as not to plant a seed in a scum softchews's mind. As it happened, that turned out not to be the case, which means it's back to the drawing board.a-wan wrote:Oh, I guess he thinks that softchews did it? Convenient that softchews hasn't claimed yet, then, isn't it?
Lorenz wrote:So now someone else can go ahead and tie the vote? You should vote a-wan to avoid someone tying it?
Lorenz wrote:Mod: if the doctor didn't guess both targets correctly (in case she decided to try), did the doctor fail completely?
Lorenz wrote:I trust sruixan because they have acted in a townie manner, scum-hunting and making coherent posts all the time, and I haven't found any faulty logic within them.
My assumption of him being town also lead me to the conclusion that both a-wan and misnomer were scum, which came true, and it also lead me to shoot e_e. It's like playing Sudoku and taking a guess, if you're wrong you're eventually going to get your assumption disproven. That hasn't happened.
I don't think I have anything more to comment until the rest of the claims.
Don't agree with this. Just because you have 'if Sruixan is town, then a-wan and Misnomer are scum', doesn't mean that if a-wan and Misnomer are scum, Sruixan is town.
Btw, do you think it's more likely it's 2-2 or 3-1? I obviously fail at counting based on my earlier post, but I see no good reason to assume either.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests