xkcd

Forums for the webcomic xkcd.com

Skip to content

ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Things that don't belong anywhere else. (Check first).

Moderators: Moderators General, Magistrates, Prelates

Post a reply

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby TheChewanater » Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:48 pm UTC

Ubik wrote:An obvious one:
misjuggling.png
414 + 942

kamasutra.gif

http://xkcd.com/414/
http://xkcd.com/942/
ImageImage
http://internetometer.com/give/4279
No one can agree how to count how many types of people there are. You could ask two people and get 10 different answers.
User avatar
TheChewanater
 
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:24 am UTC
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby SirBryghtside » Fri Aug 26, 2011 4:31 pm UTC

phlip wrote:The "dispose of books" and the Kama Sutra one both win.

Wait, XKCDSW is a competition?

Right... time to get my A game on...
Spambot5546 wrote:Well...who used it? I'd sleep next to Felicia Day's used bacon.
User avatar
SirBryghtside
 
Posts: 767
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:42 pm UTC
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby pseudoidiot » Fri Aug 26, 2011 4:40 pm UTC

Welcome to the internet. Everything is a competition.
Derailed : Gaming Outside the Box.
SexyTalon wrote:*swoons* I love you, all powerful pseudoidiot!
ShootTheChicken wrote:I can't stop thinking about pseudoidiot's penis.
User avatar
pseudoidiot
hookers and blow
 
Posts: 4614
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:30 pm UTC
Location: Kansas City
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby philsov » Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:10 pm UTC

Juggling's only, logical conclusion.

Image
An answer to the helium crisis has been found.
The time and seasons go on, but all the rhymes and reasons are wrong
I know I'll discover after its all said and done I should've been a nun.
User avatar
philsov
Not a fan of Diane Kruger
 
Posts: 1166
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 7:58 pm UTC
Location: Texas
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby thicknavyrain » Fri Aug 26, 2011 11:14 pm UTC

Anagram.jpg

XKCDC(onsiderably)W
RoadieRich wrote:Thicknavyrain is appointed Nex Artifex, Author of Death of the second FaiD Assassins' Guild.
thicknavyrain
ThinkGravyTrain
 
Posts: 912
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 12:41 pm UTC
Location: The Universe
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Kulantan » Sun Aug 28, 2011 3:34 pm UTC

pseudoidiot wrote:Welcome to the internet. Everything is a competition.

No, everything is an argument.
TEAM SHIVAHN
Pretty much the best team ever

phlip wrote:(Scholars believe it is lost to time exactly which search engine Columbus preferred... though they are reasonably sure that he was an avid user of Apple Maps.)

Blog.
User avatar
Kulantan
WINNING
 
Posts: 970
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 9:24 pm UTC
Location: Somewhere witty
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Spambot5546 » Sun Aug 28, 2011 3:37 pm UTC

Yes it is!
"It is bitter – bitter", he answered,
"But I like it
Because it is bitter,
And because it is my heart."
Spambot5546
 
Posts: 1189
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 7:34 pm UTC
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Mr. Mack » Sun Aug 28, 2011 5:02 pm UTC

Kulantan wrote:
pseudoidiot wrote:Welcome to the internet. Everything is a competition.

No, everything is an argument.

Arguments are a type of competition. That's why it's possible to "win" or lose at both.
"Bagpipes, YES!"
User avatar
Mr. Mack
 
Posts: 422
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:26 am UTC
Location: If I must.
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Microscopic cog » Sun Aug 28, 2011 5:27 pm UTC

Mr. Mack wrote:
Kulantan wrote:
pseudoidiot wrote:Welcome to the internet. Everything is a competition.

No, everything is an argument.

Arguments are a type of competition. That's why it's possible to "win" or lose at both.


No they aren't.
Spoiler:
Interviewer: Some people say they can’t understand your writing even after they read it two or three times. What approach would you suggest for them?

William Faulkner: Read it four times.
User avatar
Microscopic cog
in his catastrophic plan
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 12:09 pm UTC
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Kulantan » Sun Aug 28, 2011 5:53 pm UTC

Mr. Mack wrote:Arguments are a type of competition. That's why it's possible to "win" or lose at both.

Anyone who thinks they can win an argument on the internet is a fool or an anterograde amnesiac.
TEAM SHIVAHN
Pretty much the best team ever

phlip wrote:(Scholars believe it is lost to time exactly which search engine Columbus preferred... though they are reasonably sure that he was an avid user of Apple Maps.)

Blog.
User avatar
Kulantan
WINNING
 
Posts: 970
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 9:24 pm UTC
Location: Somewhere witty
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby GenericAnimeBoy » Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:31 pm UTC

Microscopic cog wrote:
Mr. Mack wrote:
Kulantan wrote:
pseudoidiot wrote:Welcome to the internet. Everything is a competition.

No, everything is an argument.

Arguments are a type of competition. That's why it's possible to "win" or lose at both.


No they aren't.


This isn't an argument. It's just contradiction. :lol:
In light of the impermanence and absurdity of existence, I surmise that nothing is better for us than to rejoice and to do good in our lives, and that everyone should eat and drink and enjoy the good of his/her labor. Such enjoyment is a gift from God.
User avatar
GenericAnimeBoy
 
Posts: 354
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 1:33 pm UTC
Location: Houston, TX
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Mr. Mack » Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:05 am UTC

Kulantan wrote:
Mr. Mack wrote:Arguments are a type of competition. That's why it's possible to "win" or lose at both.

Anyone who thinks they can win an argument on the internet is a fool or an anterograde amnesiac.

I agree, that's why I put win in quotation marks and didn't do so for lose.
"Bagpipes, YES!"
User avatar
Mr. Mack
 
Posts: 422
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:26 am UTC
Location: If I must.
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Ephemeron » Wed Aug 31, 2011 5:43 pm UTC

Sometimes two comics were meant to fit together:

Image

I was also the one who sent you a bobcat!

774 | 842 | 945

And a variation on an older one:

Image

She's angry because she saw the logical flaw in the original comic.

853
User avatar
Ephemeron
 
Posts: 267
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:39 pm UTC
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Blue Protoman » Fri Sep 02, 2011 2:06 am UTC

Godwin's Law
http://i.imgur.com/1pS5P.png
Blue Protoman
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 2:03 am UTC
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Microscopic cog » Sat Sep 03, 2011 12:00 pm UTC

Blue Protoman wrote:Godwin's Law
Image


Fix'd because I had to smile.
Spoiler:
Interviewer: Some people say they can’t understand your writing even after they read it two or three times. What approach would you suggest for them?

William Faulkner: Read it four times.
User avatar
Microscopic cog
in his catastrophic plan
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 12:09 pm UTC
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby ostrichguy » Sun Sep 04, 2011 3:44 am UTC

xkcd stars.png
Why do people always run away?
User avatar
ostrichguy
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 1:15 am UTC
Location: I'm right behind you.
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby sw_username » Sun Sep 04, 2011 6:02 pm UTC

Priorities
Spoiler:
Image
I'm gonna spend it all on candy, hookers and hookers named Candy.
946
sw_username
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 7:20 am UTC
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Elvish Pillager » Sun Sep 04, 2011 6:27 pm UTC

sw_username wrote:Priorities
Spoiler:
Image
I'm gonna spend it all on candy, hookers and hookers named Candy.
946

Obligatory:
Spoiler:
Image
That's how much the car costs.
1.708*10-51 / static_cast<char>(0x46 + 7*(rand()&1)) / no / the Divided States of America

GENERATION A(g64, g64): Social experiment. Take the busy beaver function of the generation number and add it to your signature.
User avatar
Elvish Pillager
 
Posts: 943
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 9:58 pm UTC
Location: Everywhere you think, nowhere you can possibly imagine.
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby ostrichguy » Tue Sep 06, 2011 7:10 pm UTC

Not sure if this has been here before, but:

Image

That wasn't by me. It was from Abtruse Goose.
User avatar
ostrichguy
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 1:15 am UTC
Location: I'm right behind you.
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby You, sir, name? » Tue Sep 06, 2011 7:18 pm UTC

Elvish Pillager wrote:
sw_username wrote:Priorities
Spoiler:
Image
I'm gonna spend it all on candy, hookers and hookers named Candy.
946

Obligatory:
Spoiler:
Image
That's how much the car costs.

Spoiler:
xkcdsw4.png
Such is the nature of capitalism.
Blag.
Ternary computer emulator. Latest version is 0.5 [Nov 29 2008].

Good morning, that's a nice tnetennba.
User avatar
You, sir, name?
 
Posts: 6128
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:07 am UTC
Location: Chako Paul City
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby xkcdinspired » Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:41 am UTC

From AI 948

Image

Alt-text: and plus he doesn't get drunk, now I'm thinking....
... Romance and Math.......

Spoiler:
http://romancemath.blogspot.com
....... plus your thoughts might be highly appreciated....
User avatar
xkcdinspired
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 6:57 am UTC
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby sw_username » Fri Sep 16, 2011 2:05 pm UTC

Earhart
Spoiler:
mystery.png

sudo make me a sandwich
950
Last edited by sw_username on Sun May 12, 2013 6:56 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.
sw_username
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 7:20 am UTC
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Kewangji » Fri Sep 16, 2011 2:25 pm UTC

It's true, sexists do have terrible grammar.
http://zombiesintelligently.com : blogful of words and daily flash fiction
Zarq wrote:I now have a newfound fear of mimes appearing above me. Thanks Obama Kewangji!
User avatar
Kewangji
Suspiciously Polite
 
Posts: 2025
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:20 pm UTC
Location: Lost in Translation
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby roband » Fri Sep 16, 2011 2:36 pm UTC

Kewangji wrote:It's true, sexists do have terrible grammar.

My first thought too
The death of Lady Diana was also predicted by Moby Dick.
__________________________________________________
It's hard being cool.
__________________________________________________
You, will never ever ever, get this annoying song out of your head.
User avatar
roband
In Your Eyes
 
Posts: 1708
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 2:52 pm UTC
Location: UK
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Ephemeron » Tue Sep 20, 2011 9:25 am UTC

The haters are gonna love this.

Image

If you get an 11/100 on a CS test, but you claim it should be counted as a 'C', then I'll cut off your other arm.
169 | 953
User avatar
Ephemeron
 
Posts: 267
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:39 pm UTC
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby kaimason1 » Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:07 pm UTC

It's supposed to be slightly worse, not a million times better! You're doing it wrong.
SexyTalon wrote:If it walks like a person, talks like a person, and tastes like a person, it's probably a person. Or I Can't Believe It's Not People, which cannibals prefer to Soylent Green nearly 5 to 1 in a blind taste test.
User avatar
kaimason1
WINNING
 
Posts: 298
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 5:05 am UTC
Location: See avatar.
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby sw_username » Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:19 pm UTC

sharing
Spoiler:
Image
*trollface*
956
sw_username
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 7:20 am UTC
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby ddog » Thu Sep 29, 2011 2:50 pm UTC

My attempt to make chin up bar worse. Just by taking a whole joke out.
Attachments
chin_up_baredit.jpg
ddog
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 6:29 pm UTC
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Dason » Thu Sep 29, 2011 2:52 pm UTC

I prefer your version ddog.
double epsilon = -.0000001;
User avatar
Dason
 
Posts: 1264
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 7:06 am UTC
Location: ~/
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby rigwarl » Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:09 am UTC

ddog, that's deep.
User avatar
rigwarl
 
Posts: 767
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 9:36 pm UTC
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby sourmìlk » Sat Oct 08, 2011 7:52 pm UTC

Apologies for the miserable photoshop job, but it appears nobody has done this. Perhaps it's in bad taste:

Spoiler:
windows.gif
The Circle of Life
windows.gif (25.13 KiB) Viewed 2079 times
Terry Pratchett wrote:The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.
User avatar
sourmìlk
If I can't complain, can I at least express my fear?
 
Posts: 6405
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:53 pm UTC
Location: permanently in the wrong
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Kirby » Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:09 pm UTC

Here's what I managed to throw together in GIMP for that one:

Spoiler:
eternal_microsoft_flame2.gif
eternal_microsoft_flame2.gif (28.18 KiB) Viewed 1937 times
User avatar
Kirby
 
Posts: 199
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 11:08 pm UTC
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby e^iπ+1=0 » Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:35 pm UTC

No. Just... no.
poxic wrote:You, sir, have heroic hair.

(Avatar by Sungura)
User avatar
e^iπ+1=0
Gooder
 
Posts: 1923
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 9:41 am UTC
Location: 54.0367˚N, 2.7961˚W; Lancaster
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby sw_username » Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:27 pm UTC

Fix'd
Spoiler:
eternal.gif
eternal.gif (1.17 MiB) Viewed 1890 times

Spinning jail made cool.
961
sw_username
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 7:20 am UTC
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby sourmìlk » Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:48 pm UTC

Kirby wrote:Here's what I managed to throw together in GIMP for that one:

Spoiler:
eternal_microsoft_flame2.gif


Showing me up I see -_-

Good job though.

sw_username wrote:Fix'd
Spoiler:
eternal.gif

Spinning jail made cool.
961


...the fuck? I'm not sure I get it.
Terry Pratchett wrote:The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.
User avatar
sourmìlk
If I can't complain, can I at least express my fear?
 
Posts: 6405
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:53 pm UTC
Location: permanently in the wrong
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Microscopic cog » Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:01 pm UTC

I'm pretty sure I don't get it. But I went to the revolving internet and with some difficulties got to this page and opened the spinning comic inside a spinning browser and it was glorious.
Spoiler:
Interviewer: Some people say they can’t understand your writing even after they read it two or three times. What approach would you suggest for them?

William Faulkner: Read it four times.
User avatar
Microscopic cog
in his catastrophic plan
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 12:09 pm UTC
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby I Am Raven » Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:05 pm UTC

Microscopic cog wrote:the revolving internet

Wow.
Ptolom wrote:penis
User avatar
I Am Raven
 
Posts: 2414
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:09 am UTC
Location: Amsterdam.
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby philsov » Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:06 pm UTC

seems simple to me.

instead of the rotating wheel and a stationary landscape, the wheel is stationary and everything else spins.
The time and seasons go on, but all the rhymes and reasons are wrong
I know I'll discover after its all said and done I should've been a nun.
User avatar
philsov
Not a fan of Diane Kruger
 
Posts: 1166
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 7:58 pm UTC
Location: Texas
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby pseudoidiot » Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:39 pm UTC

The world revolves around Steve Jobs.
Derailed : Gaming Outside the Box.
SexyTalon wrote:*swoons* I love you, all powerful pseudoidiot!
ShootTheChicken wrote:I can't stop thinking about pseudoidiot's penis.
User avatar
pseudoidiot
hookers and blow
 
Posts: 4614
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:30 pm UTC
Location: Kansas City
Top

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby e^iπ+1=0 » Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:45 pm UTC

pseudoidiot wrote:The world revolved around Steve Jobs.
FTFY

Spoiler:
Image
poxic wrote:You, sir, have heroic hair.

(Avatar by Sungura)
User avatar
e^iπ+1=0
Gooder
 
Posts: 1923
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 9:41 am UTC
Location: 54.0367˚N, 2.7961˚W; Lancaster
Top
PreviousNext
Post a reply

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: avaigororwavy, Bakstoola, erydralge, Exabot [Bot], Farpappestals, GuetraGma, Melissawu, offivaSaw, PatrickRsGhost, shealtket, SlefBalia, Tebychacy and 8 guests

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP