Amanda Knox Trial

Seen something interesting in the news or on the intertubes? Discuss it here.

Moderators: Rinsaikeru, Zamfir, Hawknc, Moderators General, Prelates

Re: Amanda Knox Trial

Postby Garm » Wed Oct 05, 2011 5:16 am UTC

CorruptUser wrote:
Garm wrote:Unless you're in Texas or Georgia.


Unless you can show me that Texas/Georgia has a higher conviction rate for murder than the rest of the US, I am going to have to disagree.


Just a throw away line referencing Troy Davis and Rick Perry's executions record.
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
- JFK
User avatar
Garm
 
Posts: 2243
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 5:29 pm UTC
Location: Usually at work. Otherwise, Longmont, CO.

Re: Amanda Knox Trial

Postby Malice » Wed Oct 05, 2011 5:37 am UTC

Garm wrote:
CorruptUser wrote:
Garm wrote:Unless you're in Texas or Georgia.


Unless you can show me that Texas/Georgia has a higher conviction rate for murder than the rest of the US, I am going to have to disagree.


Just a throw away line referencing Troy Davis and Rick Perry's executions record.


The death penalty is one thing, but as far as I know neither Troy Davis nor anyone executed during Rick Perry's governorship were prosecuted repeatedly despite verdicts of innocence. You might disagree with the way those states' criminal justice systems work (I know I do) but that doesn't mean they don't abide by the fundamental tenets of American jurisprudence.
Image
User avatar
Malice
 
Posts: 3894
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 5:37 am UTC
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Amanda Knox Trial

Postby Hemmers » Wed Oct 05, 2011 5:16 pm UTC

buddy431 wrote:On a lighter note, I like how the Daily Mail Posted the Wrong Story, saying she had been found guilty. While it's entirely reasonable to write up multiple stories ahead of time, it's a little disturbing (though not too surprising, given the source) that they even had supposed reactions from Knox. Who cares if what we write is true, as long as it sells, right?


The BBC did the exact same thing a few years ago. A gun collector with an historically significant collection of Wild West-era firearms was arrested on charges that he was selling his guns onto the black market (because an ancient S&W in an obsolete calibre that will likely blow up in your face with a modern powder load is exactly what the modern gangsta is after. Apparently :roll: ).

The trial took about 6 months, half way through the judge threw out more than half of the 24 or so charges the prosecutors had leveled against him.
When he was found innocent of all charges the BBC put a story live about how he'd been found guilty, including a quote from a senior police officer saying he was clearly a dangerous and calculating individual with links to the criminal underworld, etc, etc.
I found it somewhat disturbing that a police officer was commenting or even speculating to a member of the press on the outcome of a case in which he was involved before a verdict was reached. But then the Public Prosecutors were stubborn, even after the defendant had explained the law better than the prosecutors were able to, they persisted in pursuing the remaining charges that the judge hadn't thrown out.
As an aside, the Police still haven't returned a significant number of items to his collection, despite the judge stating that he was totally free and went from the court without blemish, and it would be churlish of the Police not to return his property immediately. This was quite a high-profile case - the Police were singing their own praises about how they'd "busted" this major black market ring but were eventually made to look very stupid. As with the Italian prosecutors in the Knox case, when their case started falling apart around them they became very unhelpful and desperate to save face rather than doing the adult thing and gracefully saying. "No, we're wrong, our evidence has been shown to be of poor or non-existent quality. Our apologies to the defendant for wasting their time, we withdraw our case."
Hemmers
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 3:50 pm UTC

Re: Amanda Knox Trial

Postby Dark567 » Wed Oct 05, 2011 7:04 pm UTC

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/casey-gre ... 93820.html

This is an interesting theory on Knox, which claims that Knox's privilege led her to believe the law and justice system were always on her side, and why she gave her cooperation.
I apologize, 90% of the time I write on the Fora I am intoxicated.


Yakk wrote:The question the thought experiment I posted is aimed at answering: When falling in a black hole, do you see the entire universe's future history train-car into your ass, or not?
Dark567
 
Posts: 3344
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:12 pm UTC
Location: Everywhere(in the US, I don't venture outside it too often, unfortunately)

Re: Amanda Knox Trial

Postby Adacore » Thu Oct 06, 2011 12:03 am UTC

Dark567 wrote:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/casey-greenfield/amanda-knox-why-she-won_b_993820.html

This is an interesting theory on Knox, which claims that Knox's privilege led her to believe the law and justice system were always on her side, and why she gave her cooperation.

That's a good point. As a relatively sheltered, white, middle-class man I certainly hold an inherent belief that the justice system is (so long as I have done nothing wrong) on my side, and if I can give any investigators an honest account of the truth then I'll be fine. I would imagine many/most people from more deprived backgrounds do not hold this view, distrust the justice system and believe that investigators are always out to try and nail them with something, even if they're actually innocent.

I'm not sure if it has as much bearing on the fact that the case got an appeal and acquittal as the article claims (I, demonstrating my aforementioned faith in the justice system, believe that would've happened anyway), but the core basis for the story is, I feel, completely accurate.
User avatar
Adacore
 
Posts: 1942
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 12:35 pm UTC
Location: 한국 창원

Re: Amanda Knox Trial

Postby emceng » Thu Oct 06, 2011 8:52 pm UTC

Adacore wrote:
Dark567 wrote:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/casey-greenfield/amanda-knox-why-she-won_b_993820.html

This is an interesting theory on Knox, which claims that Knox's privilege led her to believe the law and justice system were always on her side, and why she gave her cooperation.

That's a good point. As a relatively sheltered, white, middle-class man I certainly hold an inherent belief that the justice system is (so long as I have done nothing wrong) on my side, and if I can give any investigators an honest account of the truth then I'll be fine. I would imagine many/most people from more deprived backgrounds do not hold this view, distrust the justice system and believe that investigators are always out to try and nail them with something, even if they're actually innocent.

I'm not sure if it has as much bearing on the fact that the case got an appeal and acquittal as the article claims (I, demonstrating my aforementioned faith in the justice system, believe that would've happened anyway), but the core basis for the story is, I feel, completely accurate.


I am also a bit of a sheltered middle class person. That said I have friends on a local police force. Both from them directly telling me, and from stories they've told, the number one thing to do when questioned by the police is to SAY NOTHING. Say you'll say nothing without a lawyer, then shut the fuck up until one shows up.
When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up. - CS Lewis
User avatar
emceng
 
Posts: 2741
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 9:38 pm UTC
Location: State of Hockey

Re: Amanda Knox Trial

Postby buddy431 » Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:00 am UTC

emceng wrote:
Adacore wrote:
Dark567 wrote:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/casey-greenfield/amanda-knox-why-she-won_b_993820.html

This is an interesting theory on Knox, which claims that Knox's privilege led her to believe the law and justice system were always on her side, and why she gave her cooperation.

That's a good point. As a relatively sheltered, white, middle-class man I certainly hold an inherent belief that the justice system is (so long as I have done nothing wrong) on my side, and if I can give any investigators an honest account of the truth then I'll be fine. I would imagine many/most people from more deprived backgrounds do not hold this view, distrust the justice system and believe that investigators are always out to try and nail them with something, even if they're actually innocent.

I'm not sure if it has as much bearing on the fact that the case got an appeal and acquittal as the article claims (I, demonstrating my aforementioned faith in the justice system, believe that would've happened anyway), but the core basis for the story is, I feel, completely accurate.


I am also a bit of a sheltered middle class person. That said I have friends on a local police force. Both from them directly telling me, and from stories they've told, the number one thing to do when questioned by the police is to SAY NOTHING. Say you'll say nothing without a lawyer, then shut the fuck up until one shows up.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc
Gellert1984 wrote:Also, bomb president CIA al qaeda JFK twin towers jupiter moon martians [s]emtex.
User avatar
buddy431
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 5:21 pm UTC

Re: Amanda Knox Trial

Postby Dauric » Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:55 pm UTC

buddy431 wrote:
emceng wrote:I am also a bit of a sheltered middle class person. That said I have friends on a local police force. Both from them directly telling me, and from stories they've told, the number one thing to do when questioned by the police is to SAY NOTHING. Say you'll say nothing without a lawyer, then shut the fuck up until one shows up.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc


Frontline: The Confessions
Four Navy sailors are convicted of the murder and rape of one woman with no evidence but the confessions badgered out of them over 8 hours of interrogations each.
We're in the traffic-chopper over the XKCD boards where there's been a thread-derailment. Later, Garrus was eaten by a shark. It is believed that the Point has perished in the accident. Back to you Bob.
User avatar
Dauric
 
Posts: 3169
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 6:58 pm UTC
Location: If I knew this with any accuracy I wouldn't know if I was going to get a speeding ticket.

Re: Amanda Knox Trial

Postby LtNOWIS » Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:06 pm UTC

I don't think Rick Perry has executed many more people per year than other Texan governors; it's just that he's been governor for a very long time. And I don't think Texas executes more people per capita than a lot of other states. It simply has more people than say, Oklahoma or Virginia.
LtNOWIS
 
Posts: 369
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 4:21 pm UTC
Location: Fairfax County

Re: Amanda Knox Trial

Postby Malice » Fri Oct 07, 2011 4:22 pm UTC

LtNOWIS wrote:I don't think Rick Perry has executed many more people per year than other Texan governors; it's just that he's been governor for a very long time. And I don't think Texas executes more people per capita than a lot of other states. It simply has more people than say, Oklahoma or Virginia.


Texas has executed more people per capita than any other state except Oklahoma (period: 1976-2011). Cite
Image
User avatar
Malice
 
Posts: 3894
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 5:37 am UTC
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Amanda Knox Trial

Postby Arrian » Fri Oct 07, 2011 4:39 pm UTC

Arrian
 
Posts: 460
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 10:15 am UTC
Location: Minnesota

Re: Amanda Knox Trial

Postby Роберт » Fri Oct 07, 2011 5:14 pm UTC

addams wrote:Politics is hard. I can't do it.
It takes a nasty Jr. High School Girl in a man's body to keep up.
Роберт
 
Posts: 3828
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 1:56 am UTC

Re: Amanda Knox Trial

Postby cjmcjmcjmcjm » Sat Oct 08, 2011 5:25 am UTC

If you're a reasonably attractive white woman, this is a great year to murder someone.
frezik wrote:Anti-photons move at the speed of dark

DemonDeluxe wrote:Paying to have laws written that allow you to do what you want, is a lot cheaper than paying off the judge every time you want to get away with something shady.
User avatar
cjmcjmcjmcjm
 
Posts: 1008
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:15 am UTC
Location: Anywhere the internet is strong

Re: Amanda Knox Trial

Postby Jesse » Sat Oct 08, 2011 7:44 am UTC

cjmcjmcjmcjm wrote:If you're a reasonably attractive white woman, this is a great year to allegedly murder someone.
User avatar
Jesse
Vocal Terrorist
 
Posts: 8537
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 6:33 pm UTC
Location: Blackpool, England.

Re: Amanda Knox Trial

Postby ibgdude » Sat Oct 08, 2011 9:17 am UTC

I'm going to go on an alleged murder rampage!
Hawknc wrote:This is the easiest question ever asked on the forum, and you guys turn it into a two-page debate.

...Don't ever change.

Six pages and still going.
ibgdude
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 10:19 pm UTC

Re: Amanda Knox Trial

Postby Vash » Sat Oct 08, 2011 3:16 pm UTC

ibgdude wrote:I'm going to go on an alleged murder rampage!


I'm going to allegedly murder so many people that entire towns will be allegedly murdered. We should allegedly conspire.
User avatar
Vash
 
Posts: 470
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 9:14 pm UTC
Location: The planet Gunsmoke

Previous

Return to News & Articles

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cemper93, HungryHobo, Tebychacy and 2 guests