Nuclear physics notation

For the discussion of the sciences. Physics problems, chemistry equations, biology weirdness, it all goes here.

Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates

Nuclear physics notation

Postby some_dude » Mon Nov 07, 2011 10:02 pm UTC

Quick question: what does the notation π6351ν72 in nuclear physics mean? Google wasn't of any help.
User avatar
some_dude
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:33 am UTC
Location: Denmark

Re: Nuclear physics notation

Postby Minerva » Mon Nov 07, 2011 11:17 pm UTC

The above expression doesn't make any sense, it's not any intelligible notation I've ever seen.

Did you transcribe it correctly? Maybe post some of the surrounding context material, or a scan or image of the notation?
...suffer from the computer disease that anybody who works with computers now knows about. It's a very serious disease and it interferes completely with the work. The trouble with computers is you play with them. They are so wonderful. - Richard Feynman
User avatar
Minerva
 
Posts: 896
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 2:58 pm UTC
Location: Australia

Re: Nuclear physics notation

Postby some_dude » Mon Nov 07, 2011 11:30 pm UTC

It's from the article "extreme deformations at high spin" by P.J. Twin. He uses that notation all the time unfortunately. Here's an example of the context:
Several excited SD bands have been observed in 151Tb. These include 2 signature partners identified as low-N neutron excitations based on the 150Tb π63ν71 configuration, and a proton excitation from the 63 to the 64 orbital.


BTW the "v" is a nu.
User avatar
some_dude
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:33 am UTC
Location: Denmark

Re: Nuclear physics notation

Postby Mr_Rose » Tue Nov 08, 2011 11:19 am UTC

Looks a lot like electron orbital notation, but it's a bit off...either he's talking about molecules (doubtful) or he's talking about nuclear (baryonic?) orbitals which I know even less about.
Microevolution is a term — when used by creationists — that is the evolutionary equivalent of the belief that the mechanism you use to walk from your bedroom to the kitchen is insufficient to get you from New York to Los Angeles.
Mr_Rose
 
Posts: 379
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 9:32 am UTC

Re: Nuclear physics notation

Postby Tass » Tue Nov 08, 2011 12:52 pm UTC

Mr_Rose wrote:Looks a lot like electron orbital notation, but it's a bit off...either he's talking about molecules (doubtful) or he's talking about nuclear (baryonic?) orbitals which I know even less about.


It is pretty clear that it is about nuclear orbitals.
ATCG wrote:
Tass wrote:Nice to see another person sharing my views of quantum mechanics. Use Occam's razor, cut out the wavefunction collapse.
I had to chuckle after reading this, then noticing your location. Surely you risk being burned at the stake as a heretic. :wink:
User avatar
Tass
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 2:21 pm UTC
Location: Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen.

Re: Nuclear physics notation

Postby Lukeje » Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:45 pm UTC

Googling superdeformed band notation gives a couple of hits, most notably this which gives an explanation of the symbol of a band in Gd.
User avatar
Lukeje
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 9:28 pm UTC
Location: United Kingdom.

Re: Nuclear physics notation

Postby some_dude » Tue Nov 08, 2011 3:34 pm UTC

Thanks, so π63ν71 means that there are 3 protons in the nuclear shell with oscillator quantum number N=6 and a single neutron in the shell with N=7. Apparently I need to work on my Google skills.
User avatar
some_dude
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:33 am UTC
Location: Denmark


Return to Science

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: beojan, Meteoric and 9 guests