Moderators: Moderators General, Magistrates, Prelates
SirMustapha wrote:Red Hal wrote:That's more like it. Wit, panache, a reference to xkcdsucks and a stubborn refusal to grasp the point that sometimes the image merely illustrates the alt-text. Keep 'em coming!
"RANT"
WATER
Idhan wrote:The Moomin wrote:I can't help but feel that future archaeologists will unearth these and conclude we were a planet of poop worshippers.
That would be awesome. We should come up with more cool ways to troll future archaeologists.
It's too bad that reusable shopping bags are actually more environmentally harmful than the disposable ones.
devent wrote:Also I find the groceries stores in Germany way more efficient. I was also in the Philippines, so I can compare Philippines style (the same as in USA I think) and Australian style. Both in the Phill. and AU they pack for you, but in Germany it's still faster and more efficient, because you can take the shopping cart outside the cashier. So you put everything back in the shopping cart, pay, go outside the cashier and put the groceries in your bags or car.
Oktalist wrote:Eebster the Great wrote:pbnjstowell wrote:And the raw meat never goes in with the veggies.
I can't figure out why this would matter.
Ever eaten raw meat?
dja wrote:It's too bad that reusable shopping bags are actually more environmentally harmful than the disposable ones.
Neither of your articles support your position. They both agree reusable bags they are the best choice, if used.
The only criticism I really see is that some people might not use the bags... obviously, that's not going to help.
The "environmentalists" actually have the economic argument on their side - they charge for the wasteful bags to change consumer behavior. When bags are free, consumers / baggers make irrational decisions by using too many bags, ultimately leading to waste. If you price in the waste, then people become motivated to use the reusable bags.
Of course, retailers tend to push consumers toward reusable bags for their own bottom-line. Although bags aren't very profitable, it prevents waste (money) through old fashioned market mechanisms.
First article wrote:But a draft report by the Environment Agency, obtained by the
Independent on Sunday, has found that ordinary high density polythene (HDPE) bags used by shops are actually greener than supposedly low impact choices.
....
HDPE bags are, for each use, almost 200 times less damaging to the climate than cotton hold-alls favoured by environmentalists, and have less than one third of the Co2 emissions than paper bags which are given out by retailers such as Primark.
.....
It found that an HDPE plastic bag would have a baseline global warming potential of 1.57 kg Co2 equivalent, falling to 1.4 kg Co2e if re-used once, the same as a paper bag used four times (1.38 kg Co2e).
A cotton bag would have to be re-used 171 times to emit a similar level, 1.57 kg Co2e.
.....
The researchers concluded: “The HDPE bag had the lowest environmental impacts of the single use options in nine of the 10 impact categories. The bag performed well because it was the lightest single use bag considered.”
Second article wrote:At present, many of the bags go unused -- remaining stashed instead in consumers' closets or in the trunks of their cars. Earlier this year, KPIX in San Francisco polled 500 of its television viewers and found that more than half -- 58% -- said they almost never take reusable cloth shopping bags to the grocery store.
Eebster the Great wrote:devent wrote:Also I find the groceries stores in Germany way more efficient. I was also in the Philippines, so I can compare Philippines style (the same as in USA I think) and Australian style. Both in the Phill. and AU they pack for you, but in Germany it's still faster and more efficient, because you can take the shopping cart outside the cashier. So you put everything back in the shopping cart, pay, go outside the cashier and put the groceries in your bags or car.
MathUhhhSaurus wrote:Or next to my car -_-
Diadem wrote:What is a reusable bag? I mean, aren't all bags reusable?
What I don't get is why people are saying that them bagging your stuff is faster. Having the cashier pack bags is extra time yes? Time he can't spend helping other customers. I get that it's faster if instead of helping the next customer the cashier just sits around waiting for you to pack your bags, but why on earth would they do that?
JWalker wrote:So you'd have to use your reusable bag ~171 times to break even with the normal plastic bags...
ijuin wrote:Diadem wrote:What is a reusable bag? I mean, aren't all bags reusable?
As others in this thread have said, the bags provided by grocery stores in the USA tend to be too flimsy to survive multiple uses, and a typical example of them will disintegrate if loaded with more than 5-6 kg.What I don't get is why people are saying that them bagging your stuff is faster. Having the cashier pack bags is extra time yes? Time he can't spend helping other customers. I get that it's faster if instead of helping the next customer the cashier just sits around waiting for you to pack your bags, but why on earth would they do that?
Some stores have a separate bagging clerk from the cashier, who bags the items as soon as they are scanned by the computer. Thus, the bagging is finished by the time the customer finishes fumbling with the cash or credit/debit card. This maximizes the number of customers that can be processed by each cash register. As for why the stores do not simply add more cash registers instead, registers cost money and take up additional floor space that could be devoted to retail items, so reducing the amount of time that it takes to process each customer can be more cost-effective up to a point--ten cashiers and ten bag clerks might be able to process as many customers as fifteen cashiers alone with the cashier or customer bagging the items, but the savings of not needing the five additional cash registers may justify the cost of the five extra employees.
whateveries wrote:I wonder if it is a sign that his real lfe might have become more worthy and less time can be spent on repetive inconstructive[1] critical analysis.
Eebster the Great wrote:devent wrote:Also I find the groceries stores in Germany way more efficient. I was also in the Philippines, so I can compare Philippines style (the same as in USA I think) and Australian style. Both in the Phill. and AU they pack for you, but in Germany it's still faster and more efficient, because you can take the shopping cart outside the cashier. So you put everything back in the shopping cart, pay, go outside the cashier and put the groceries in your bags or car.
In almost all U.S. supermarkets you take the shopping cart out to your car and then leave them in one of the designated areas of the parking lot.Oktalist wrote:Eebster the Great wrote:pbnjstowell wrote:And the raw meat never goes in with the veggies.
I can't figure out why this would matter.
Ever eaten raw meat?
Presumably the meat is in a sealed container though . . .
bp920091 wrote:In General, from my experience as a cashier, bagging takes maybe another second after scanning an item if arranged properly. Notice how most of the stores that have a seperate bagging person are unionized, sloppy, and generally dont care what you think. A properly trained cashier can greet, scan items, bag said items immediately after, while talking to the customer, arranging payment information and directing this process all in a VERY short time, generally less than 90 seconds for 15-20 items.
Unfortunately we have lazy people who think they are better than the job chatting it up with half the people who come through. I have to record inventory numbers in a notebook and I am still faster than most cashiers with a bit more courtesy too.Diadem wrote:How does it work in the USA? You're not a poor country, surely you guys have bar codes and scanners too right? So how can it take that long to scan a few products?
Pfhorrest wrote:As someone who is not easily offended, I don't really mind anything in this conversation.
jonadab wrote:Some stores do have a self-checkout (e.g., Meijer), but it takes about twice as long to check out that way, because you are not the cashier and don't spend forty hours a week running items across a scanner and tucking them into bags and consequently haven't attained the same level of deftness. Also, paying takes several times as long in the self-checkout, because you're using a slow, badly-designed touch-screen interface; whereas, a cashier in a regular checkout lane would be using a traditional keyboard-based register.
SirMustapha wrote:
It's mostly the bitter realisation that Randall doesn't give a shit about criticism, constructive or not.
whateveries wrote:to work out why Randall might not give a shit about crticism levied at his comics from within the forums, consider, perhaps, he would be more likely to seek this kind of thing from his peers and family than,um, you or I.
whateveries wrote:As for the Forum, I wonder if the little dataminer insidce randall has an ongoing chart of hit and miss topics, determined not by the content of the forum, but by the volume the exact phrase is lost and sloshing around somwhere in my grey matter, but the 'any exposure is good exposure' notion might be in play here.
For Instance lets look at the discussion generated by a comic about bagging groceries, and assuming the volume of discussion it is a pretty good indicator of quality of topic, and perhaps execution.
Diadem wrote:One thing I wonder though. If you shop for groceries once a month, how do you keep stuff from spoiling. Milk, Bread, Vegetables, Meat, they don't stay good for a full month.
Well I know you guys don't have proper milk (a terrible terrible shame. You don't know what you're missing), and if I'm not mistaken Americans don't eat a lot of bread.
But surely you eat vegetables and meat? Does every American own a gigantic freezer? But even then you can't freeze everything.
Biliboy wrote:No one has mentioned Aldi, which is I believe a german discount grocery that's come to the US. There are no bags at all unless you bring your own or buy their cloth bag. We use their empty cardboard boxes, which are left in the aisle for customers, to store the food in the car.
The cashier (who gets to sit down the entire time, which is awesome for them) takes your items off the conveyor, scans them, and puts them into an empty buggy sitting next to him/her. You pay, take the buggy, and your old buggy is left behind waiting on the next customer. The buggies have an ingenious lock that operates with a quarter, to get a buggy, you unlock it from the rack outside with a quarter, and to get the quarter back you need to replace it... there are absolutely no buggies randomly sitting around the parking lot, and no guy who's job it is to move them around.
It's gotten to the point that my family hasn't seen a paper bag in years, and we call the little plastic bags "walmart bags" because that's the only place we get them from anymore.
Eebster the Great wrote:People who do big shopping only rarely (which is not usually considered a good practice, and is mostly done by people living on monthly paychecks) still buy some things like meat and dairy every day or couple of days, but most of their packaged food and non-perishables and a huge variety of non-foodstuffs they buy all at once.Diadem wrote:One thing I wonder though. If you shop for groceries once a month, how do you keep stuff from spoiling. Milk, Bread, Vegetables, Meat, they don't stay good for a full month.
Eebster the Great wrote:Uh, you are mistaken on both accounts. Americans do have "proper milk" (unless you think milk is only "proper" if coming from some mammal other than cows or goats) and do eat a lot of bread.Diadem wrote:]Well I know you guys don't have proper milk (a terrible terrible shame. You don't know what you're missing), and if I'm not mistaken Americans don't eat a lot of bread.
Diadem wrote:Guess that makes more sense. But in that case if you're gonna have to make a trip to the supermarket a few times a week anyway, why not get whatever your need in non-perishables as well, instead of getting those in once a month in a big trip? Seems you lose the one big advantage of buying everything at once (saving a lot of time) if 'everything' isn't quite everything.
Return to Individual XKCD Comic Threads
Users browsing this forum: AK49BWL, crusnik02, HAL9000, htom, jjjdavidson, jowo, Lardy Plans, MobTeeseboose, ronnieve, tman2nd, vcvcvc12, yappobiscuits, Ylbbin72 and 19 guests