Hey guys, sorry for being inactive. I had 3 exams this week.
Anyways, here is my analysis:
AngrySquirrel - confused by conman, question's bio, opposes NL. Makes shorter posts, but explains non-participation in recent post. Gut says neutral-scummy.
GopherofPern - prior to his big post this page, he had posted less than me. Ends up voting for AS, who is coming off as slightly scummy. Overall, GOP is coming off as townish to me.
Bio - has a post restriction, which doesn't say anything about his alignment. Appears to be trying to sound somewhat neutral on issues, and hasn't really pressed his own opinion that much, with the exception of NL statement, which is common knowledge. Hasn't posted since, so he's coming off as slightly scummy to me.
mpolo - mpolo has been fairly active in the game, and has posted about most of the topics. He initiated the vote on Conman, which combined with his activity is somewhat townie, though he doesn't appear to have too strong of opinions on any players yet. Townish.
conman - Posted a lot from the get-go. First off, his FoS of Bio for a role restriction seems somewhat unfounded. While he later unFOSed, he still appeared to be on the attack of BIO for a bit, but eventually came off it. His vote on Adam H is interesting, as Adam H had recently (and not unjustly) received a lot of attention from his suggestions. It's quite possible that conman was trying to draw some attention away from himself. In short, I can see conman being 1 of 2 cases: he is either scum, or he is not very articulate in his analysis. I'm rocking back and forth on this, but for now I'm going to say scummy-neutral.
after rereading my notes, I actually think conman may not be as scummy as first thought.
forallofthis - moderately active. Is at first suspicous of conman, but changes his mind on that issue. Same story with Adam H. Votes for TLC on the premise that TLC appears to be trying to cause a NL. Coming across as townie, but i may change that after reviewing TLC.
roband - seems to think of conman. initially votes for Adam H due to his bad ideas (I'm going to say neutral). Then he started going back and forth with boomfrog, where I think he adaquately defended his vote, which was one of the first votes in the game. His vote on Boomfrog seems more justified than OMGUS. Likely town.
Adam H - Low content posts until his mass-roleclaim/NL suggestions, but of which are generally scum strategies, and he later says he is against a NL. I'm not sure how to read this, because if he knew that NL was a bad idea, he shouldn't have suggested it, and he only stated that he was against the idea once people told him it was a bad idea. After being voted for by Roband, he spends a lot of his posts being very defensive. He appears to be very scummy to me, although I'll withhold full judgement, as boomfrog has stated:
BoomFrog wrote:Not to mention Adam does "scummy" things like this D1 pretty much all the time.
Tastelikecoke - varied gamespec, we start seeing some content in the middle of the second page. I can't seem to get a read on TLC, as he has been somewhat mimicing general consensuses a bit. I find TLC's vote of mpolo interesting, and I had pinged mpolo as town, but I'm not sure it leads anywhere.
Boomfrog - moderately active, where most of his activity centered around attacking Roband's vote. While he does seem a bit townie by initially questioning Roband's vote (which is all fine and good in itself), it is curious that he would think Roband as townish, yet saying that he would return his vote maybe, and I'm a tad concerned about his bandwagon idea. Overall: maybe town, maybe scum.
Webby - 2 posts: some role spec, and his analysis. I would say that his vote for me was justified, but given that prior to that post I had posted 3 posts, I'm not so sure anymore, which is kind of scummy.
I need to think a bit before I cast my vote, but I will cast it sometime tonight.