Moderators: jestingrabbit, Moderators General, Prelates
mrface wrote:I like b.i.o's idea of Saffron's win condition. Killing everyone but Mal seems more likely story-wise, but I think that would be a pretty hard win to pull off.
These are good points, in fact I'd guess Simon's only goal is to keep River alive, and there are scum out there who's only goal is to kill her, not nessesarily through lynching. Maybe a special "abduction" nightkill since throwing her out the airlock doesn't help anyone. I'd guess river herself might be a powerful roles such as Jack of all trades, where she can kill, doctor, cop, and roleblock once each or something like that. I think the game, like the show will hinge around her quite a bit.mrface wrote:I don't think there's any doubt about Simon being a doctor. He also may have some lover-like role with River. He could have a secondary win for keeping her alive.
...
Early was only in for a single episode, but if anything, I'd say he's a lyncher for River.
That's a REALLY bizarre interpretation of mechanic. I think she is more likely, well, hmm I can't think of anything besides inventor. But inventor roles always make things a bit complicated.Sungura wrote:Kaylee - Since she fixes things (the mechanic) maybe she has some way of undoing mistakes of the town, like if a townie is lynched maybe she has the option to undo the lynch or such.
Silas wrote:Nobody who gets paid by the hour invents a cotton gin.
They probably just got confused as you posted a one-line post before GoP (who came up with the idea), so misattributed the post in their head.b.i.o wrote:mrface wrote:I like b.i.o's idea of Saffron's win condition. Killing everyone but Mal seems more likely story-wise, but I think that would be a pretty hard win to pull off.
Much as I love taking credit for others' ideas, I haven't actually posted any sort of content yet. So unless you're reading my mind, something in this statement is wrong.
Also, real post tomorrow. I am tired and need to wake up in ~6 hours.
_infina_ wrote:3. You may not quote your role pm verbatim or by paraphrasing.
Shivahn wrote:I am a motherfucking sorceror.
Mostlynormal wrote:_infina_ wrote:3. You may not quote your role pm verbatim or by paraphrasing.
This seems to deviate from the norm, which usually says you may paraphrase. Anyone have any idea what that might mean for roles? Also:
What does "or by paraphrasing" mean? Can we claim our name? What about our powers in general?
_infina_ wrote:Mostlynormal wrote:_infina_ wrote:3. You may not quote your role pm verbatim or by paraphrasing.
This seems to deviate from the norm, which usually says you may paraphrase. Anyone have any idea what that might mean for roles? Also:
What does "or by paraphrasing" mean? Can we claim our name? What about our powers in general?
...Are you trying to incite my wrath by misquoting me? That is it, you are spaced.
roband wrote:It's been cleared up? Where?
Sungura wrote:Frankly, second shadow is bugging me. Not so much in actual game play (although, I don't like how the one post of content was basically a quick few words on main characters summing up what everyone else already said, only original idea is for book and rest is extremely mundane) but in who they might be. I am really getting a feeling I have played with this person before "back in the day" you may say.
Sungura wrote:I guess perhaps you are not allowed to say but a name like "second shadow" makes me think you have played here before first of all, secondly a shadow of /what/...is this alternate identity something to do with this game itself - i.e. was it required by the mod to make an alt account for your character?
Sungura wrote:If it helps at all - since i know you are new too (I've played since before this was even a subforum for mafia) I have a long history of being extremely good at meta and figuring things out.
ForAllOfThis wrote:Wait what? I've been playing on these forums for over a year now. That's not new (but I suppose compared to you it is).Sungura wrote:If it helps at all - since i know you are new too (I've played since before this was even a subforum for mafia) I have a long history of being extremely good at meta and figuring things out.
This.Angua wrote:They probably just got confused as you posted a one-line post before GoP (who came up with the idea), so misattributed the post in their head.b.i.o wrote:mrface wrote:I like b.i.o's idea of Saffron's win condition. Killing everyone but Mal seems more likely story-wise, but I think that would be a pretty hard win to pull off.
Much as I love taking credit for others' ideas, I haven't actually posted any sort of content yet. So unless you're reading my mind, something in this statement is wrong.
Also, real post tomorrow. I am tired and need to wake up in ~6 hours.
b.i.o wrote:Also getting a minor ping at the moment on FAOT, although I'm not going to vote until I've had another read-through tomorrow when I'm less tired.
ForAllOfThis wrote:Your saying you think I'm scum without giving any reasons for me to respond to / defend myself and just leaving? Yea, because that screams townie play from you, /sarcasm.
Users browsing this forum: Bakstoola and 1 guest