fearless wrote:If I investigated az, I'll know his role but he won't know mine. We would have to spend another day investigating me before we have two confirmed masons. Seemed like a waste. I'm pretty sure az is innocent, I know I am, and there are more guilty looking people out there.
You wouldn't have needed to spend another day investigating the other person. Investigate one housemate and you get a scum/town result. If it's scum, announce in-thread, they are lynched and you are indirectly confirmed as town by announcing who scum is. If they are town, you could vote for them to have the power every night and it stays in towns hands.
I'll be honest, the more I look at this situation the more I suspect an Az & Fearless scum team. They both voted for Lataro yesterday (easy bandwagon, would give them unmonitored daychat and complete control of a cop). Today, Az doesn't want fearless to be lynched because 'he doesn't want all his eggs in one basket'. It's pretty clear that you'd have to use the power tonight anyway Az, as fearless can't be trusted, so the eggs are already in one basket. Finally, I find not using the cop last night to clear one of the two of you abit of a suspicous move.
I did get a minor ping from one of my housemates in the PM's last night. We had to vote for someone to carry out the doctor, and the person we voted for was reluctant to carry out the doctor incase me and the other housemate thought they were scum. There was a slight misunderstanding because they thought that we only voted on who carried out the doctor, and not the target. Still I thought it was suspicous and even mentioned so in PM's to both housemates. I wasn't sure how to mention it in thread without revealing the housemate, but if I see anything more suspicous from them I will mention it so we can decide if it's worth revealing that player or not.