Moderators: SecondTalon, Moderators General, Prelates
Mighty Jalapeno wrote:Can someone help me get a decent-quality image of the boats from the House, MD intro? I figure this is the best thread to do it in!
Angua wrote:Spoiler:
Chen wrote:Angua wrote:Spoiler:Spoiler:
SlyReaper wrote:Spoiler:
SlyReaper wrote:Spoiler:
It doesn't matter how House the character would treat it - unless he ended up being wrong, they should have left the issue alone. This show has basically illegitamised the sexuality of a whole group of people by letting him be proven to be correct.Chen wrote:SlyReaper wrote:Spoiler:
Except as I said, that the way House (the character) treats almost anything he doesn't directly agree with. The people who are too honest, the people who were heroic, the guy who was just being altruistic etc. Now I'll grant it would certainly help if he was wrong about these more often than he's right. That aspect does somewhat show the trait (whichever one it is) as being "wrong" but it is not always the case. It does seem like a subtle difference and I do suppose most people wouldn't catch that which in turn could make it a poor thing to put on TV, but I didn't read it that way personally.
Angua wrote:It doesn't matter how House the character would treat it - unless he ended up being wrong, they should have left the issue alone. This show has basically illegitamised the sexuality of a whole group of people by letting him be proven to be correct.Chen wrote:SlyReaper wrote:Spoiler:
Except as I said, that the way House (the character) treats almost anything he doesn't directly agree with. The people who are too honest, the people who were heroic, the guy who was just being altruistic etc. Now I'll grant it would certainly help if he was wrong about these more often than he's right. That aspect does somewhat show the trait (whichever one it is) as being "wrong" but it is not always the case. It does seem like a subtle difference and I do suppose most people wouldn't catch that which in turn could make it a poor thing to put on TV, but I didn't read it that way personally.
folkhero wrote:Angua wrote:It doesn't matter how House the character would treat it - unless he ended up being wrong, they should have left the issue alone. This show has basically illegitamised the sexuality of a whole group of people by letting him be proven to be correct.Chen wrote:SlyReaper wrote:Spoiler:
Except as I said, that the way House (the character) treats almost anything he doesn't directly agree with. The people who are too honest, the people who were heroic, the guy who was just being altruistic etc. Now I'll grant it would certainly help if he was wrong about these more often than he's right. That aspect does somewhat show the trait (whichever one it is) as being "wrong" but it is not always the case. It does seem like a subtle difference and I do suppose most people wouldn't catch that which in turn could make it a poor thing to put on TV, but I didn't read it that way personally.
Just curious: would you say that they should have left the issue of religion alone, and that the show illegitimized the religion of a whole group of people by letting House be proven correct?
KrazyerKate wrote:I think the show jumped the shark for me, I want to know if it did for anyone else.
emceng wrote:Ok, saw a new episode for the first time in...a year? Something like that. So yeah, spoilers:Spoiler:
Adam H wrote:Series finaleSpoiler:
Adam H wrote:Series finaleSpoiler:
sillybear25 wrote:But it's NPH, so it's creepy in the best possible way.
Shivahn wrote:I'm in your abstractions, burning your notions of masculinity.
KrazyerKate wrote: How many great trainwreck stories can you think of?
folkhero wrote:KrazyerKate wrote: How many great trainwreck stories can you think of?
The Greek tragedies, the Shakespearean tragedies, Thomas Hardy's tragedies, Breaking Bad...
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests