Moderators: jestingrabbit, Moderators General, Prelates
Silas wrote:Nobody who gets paid by the hour invents a cotton gin.
ForAllOfThis wrote:We should vote on who gets it. That way town majority will end up deciding.
Pfhorrest wrote:As someone who is not easily offended, I don't really mind anything in this conversation.
Fire Brns wrote:I'm examining the last two votes to see if I can define people into their groups. (like clue) but even if I did I doubt the mod would let me share my findings. No luck yet...
You seem to be confused about some rules? As long as you haven't broken any rules you should be able to post anything you want. Which rule do you think prevents your from posting your "findings"?I'm examining the last two votes to see if I can define people into their groups. (like clue) but even if I did I doubt the mod would let me share my findings. No luck yet...
Silas wrote:Nobody who gets paid by the hour invents a cotton gin.
This is pretty much me word for word.....mpolo wrote:I tend to be non-commital on day one as town because I very seldom have solid pings. I have to learn to "be bold" and just accuse someone. I understand how this is frustrating for you, since you have exactly the opposite play style (slight exaggeration for effect here).
Pfhorrest wrote:As someone who is not easily offended, I don't really mind anything in this conversation.
Pfhorrest wrote:As someone who is not easily offended, I don't really mind anything in this conversation.
mpolo wrote:Az is essentially the third confirmed town (after Shepherd Book and Mal), so isn't in that much additional danger of being converted compared with anyone else. Book and Mal would presumably have a higher chance of having been converted. We've heard from Book, but not from Mal thus far.
That is actually the entire point of the game. If you can draw any conclusions from people's voting patterns D1 you should tell us about them, and moreover explain your reasoning. If you draw good conclusions it will increase our confidence that you are town and help us catch scum. If you continue to post so little then we will be forced to assume your scum trying to avoid notice.Fire Brns wrote:I doubted that went with the spirit of the game. Ex: these four are town, these three are mafia, and these 2 are cult ect...
Anyway, the first vote as mpolo said should be skewed.
I was going by people voting not voted for. I tried one of those corkboard, pictures and string systems to see if I could find out who is voting as a block.
In honor of this being a Firefly game anyone speak a lick of Chinese?
这今天是高兴聚会。
Silas wrote:Nobody who gets paid by the hour invents a cotton gin.
Silas wrote:Nobody who gets paid by the hour invents a cotton gin.
BoomFrog wrote:10. mrface - Seems to be pushing for an easy lynch D1, going after lurker SecondShadow, and passive Angua. Also:"Seem certain"? Why so timid with your assertion? Either River started the game as a Revear or they can recruit. The former is laughable so I'd say the latter is iron-clad. Your statement isn't false, but the wording pings me. - Slightly scummy.I agree that it does seem certain that the Reavers have at least a limited culting ability, now.
Chandani wrote:What happens in case of a tie?
More like: "this is a happy party today."BoomFrog wrote:Fire Brns wrote:In honor of this being a Firefly game anyone speak a lick of Chinese?
这今天是高兴聚会。
My coworker translated that for me as, "It is very happy that we can get together."
Pfhorrest wrote:As someone who is not easily offended, I don't really mind anything in this conversation.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest