Moderators: Moderators General, Magistrates, Prelates
emceng wrote:I also want to avoid lame answers - no paying off your debt, giving it to charity, or lending out to someone. Investments are acceptable, but borderline.
Webzter wrote:emceng wrote:I also want to avoid lame answers - no paying off your debt, giving it to charity, or lending out to someone. Investments are acceptable, but borderline.
Well, fine then, if I actually have to spend it. I'd finally buy the Everyman's Library Contemporary Classics Set and build some proper bookshelves in my office. I know it's quaint these days, but I still really like physical books.
The rest would go to finishing the work I want to do in the yard/garden.
It's kinda hard to say what "perfect" is for recreational listening. You wouldn't want it to be an anechoic chamber, but you don't want it too lively either. Where in between those two extremes is perfect?Little Richie wrote:Personally, I would build a listening room designed for one or two people. Amazingly flat response, and a close to perfect environment.
I wouldn't go to the crazy audiophile levels with the actual system, that can always be upgraded.
addams wrote:Politics is hard. I can't do it.
It takes a nasty Jr. High School Girl in a man's body to keep up.
Роберт wrote:It's kinda hard to say what "perfect" is for recreational listening. You wouldn't want it to be an anechoic chamber, but you don't want it too lively either. Where in between those two extremes is perfect?Little Richie wrote:Personally, I would build a listening room designed for one or two people. Amazingly flat response, and a close to perfect environment.
I wouldn't go to the crazy audiophile levels with the actual system, that can always be upgraded.
You might have some panels that are broadband absorbers on one side but reflective on the other side. Diffusion, maybe?
Little Richie wrote:Роберт wrote:It's kinda hard to say what "perfect" is for recreational listening. You wouldn't want it to be an anechoic chamber, but you don't want it too lively either. Where in between those two extremes is perfect?Little Richie wrote:Personally, I would build a listening room designed for one or two people. Amazingly flat response, and a close to perfect environment.
I wouldn't go to the crazy audiophile levels with the actual system, that can always be upgraded.
You might have some panels that are broadband absorbers on one side but reflective on the other side. Diffusion, maybe?
Рад тебя видеть Bob,
Personally if I had all the time I needed, and a larger budget I would start with anechoic flat, and work up from there in terms of reflections ect. until I found the best for me. Based on the fact that we are biological, I'd argue that there is no "perfect" room for everyone, but I really don't know how varied hearing is person to person.
addams wrote:Politics is hard. I can't do it.
It takes a nasty Jr. High School Girl in a man's body to keep up.
Роберт wrote:Little Richie wrote:Роберт wrote:It's kinda hard to say what "perfect" is for recreational listening. You wouldn't want it to be an anechoic chamber, but you don't want it too lively either. Where in between those two extremes is perfect?Little Richie wrote:Personally, I would build a listening room designed for one or two people. Amazingly flat response, and a close to perfect environment.
I wouldn't go to the crazy audiophile levels with the actual system, that can always be upgraded.
You might have some panels that are broadband absorbers on one side but reflective on the other side. Diffusion, maybe?
Рад тебя видеть Bob,
Personally if I had all the time I needed, and a larger budget I would start with anechoic flat, and work up from there in terms of reflections ect. until I found the best for me. Based on the fact that we are biological, I'd argue that there is no "perfect" room for everyone, but I really don't know how varied hearing is person to person.
Круто.))
'twould be pretty cool to have an anechoic chamber. I've heard those things are disorienting to be in. I think a true one would be out of the 10k budget, but I guess you could get pretty close for cheaper.
.
emceng wrote:An RF anechoic chamber, used, could be had for maybe $100k. A sound anechoic chamber is going to be more, depending on size.
addams wrote:Politics is hard. I can't do it.
It takes a nasty Jr. High School Girl in a man's body to keep up.
Роберт wrote:Heck, an Allen and Heath GS-R24 + the monitors for a 5.1 surround system would already put me back around 10k, without any room treatment. And I'm not sure I'd have a good place to fit it. It'd be nice, though!
Say, does any one have $50,000 that they want to give to me with the "you have to spend it on yourself this weekend" restrictions? I'd be able to do a lot, then.
Users browsing this forum: asicsNorterabebuby, Bkppiw39, carpinteyroqbe, dsaemykch, Essertest, Fekeenuisance, HoloEffelayEncubErurijiz, imicheAcics, Josephine, mqmsju22, PAstrychef, plaislelabisa, rogerUrbataabith, Slageammalymn, SlefBalia, thudworm, WeMbrerveguet and 17 guests