Dark567 wrote:How much would a Death Star costs? More money than is on Earth many times over.
Just have the Italian Mafia print off a bunch of 100 Trillion Dollar U.S. bonds to pay for it.
Moderators: Rinsaikeru, Zamfir, Hawknc, Moderators General, Prelates
Dark567 wrote:How much would a Death Star costs? More money than is on Earth many times over.
addams wrote:Politics is hard. I can't do it.
It takes a nasty Jr. High School Girl in a man's body to keep up.
Роберт wrote:Dark567 wrote:How much would a Death Star costs? More money than is on Earth many times over.
Just have the Italian Mafia print off a bunch of 100 Trillion Dollar U.S. bonds to pay for it.
SlyReaper wrote:
Besides, I'm sure it wouldn't be too hard to convert this into a Death Star.
SexyTalon wrote:the Hot Freshness of Wicked Classic.
ShootTheChicken wrote:A battle station that is simultaneously a moon? That would melt some faces.
Police told the Taipei Times they were disgusted when they arrived at the scene to find other gamers were disinterested in the corpse and wanted to continue playing during the investigation
Ghostbear wrote:
Their cost figures for the steel assume that prices would remain constant in a situation where we are able to extract enough of it. I guess the end result would still be "way more money than exists on the Earth", but that seems a bit odd to say immediately after concluding that we do, technically, have the natural wealth to pull it off. Presumably, going by their argument (and assuming we could get a sufficiently good way to transfer those construction materials to space), we have the resources to actually go ahead and build a death star if humanity was willing to go all in for it. Would that not mean that we do have the money for it, since money is just a representation of wealth?
Ibid wrote:So yes, we "have the money for it", but that doesn't mean we can spend that money right now. Think of it like a mortgage. You'll have the money over your lifetime, but that doesn't mean you can have it right now.
folkhero wrote:Kim Jong Un: the rumors of his death were greatly exaggerated, probably.
Djehutynakht wrote:http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Israel+toddler+chews+head+snake/6061344/story.html
A toddler in Israel was recently discovered in his room calmly chewing off the head of an extremely poisonous snake.
The 62-foot tall statue of Jesus constructed out of styrofoam, wood and fiberglass resin caught on fire after the right hand of the statue was struck by lightning.
meatyochre wrote:And yea, verily the forums crowd spake: "Teehee!"
Ibid wrote:Of course it would take MORE than 13 000 years, since as you mentioned the cost of iron would go up as demand went up.
SlyReaper wrote:Ibid wrote:Of course it would take MORE than 13 000 years, since as you mentioned the cost of iron would go up as demand went up.
It's never that straight-forward though, because supply would increase to satisfy the demand. As entrepreneurs notice the price of steel rising, they'll want a piece of the pie and so will start producing the stuff. They'll start competing with each other and possibly start over-producing the stuff. The price may actually go down; it's not beyond the realms of possibility that the sharp increase in the price of steel would be followed by a crash. It's not like we've never seen boom-and-bust before.
That said, why are we assuming the Death Star is made of steel? You'd think a galaxy-spanning empire would have access to more advanced materials than steel. I wonder if a Death Star made of steel would actually implode under its own gravity.
Ghostbear wrote:Ibid wrote:So yes, we "have the money for it", but that doesn't mean we can spend that money right now. Think of it like a mortgage. You'll have the money over your lifetime, but that doesn't mean you can have it right now.
I agree, but I was taking issue with the statement "More money than is on Earth many times over". I did not mean to imply that we could get all that construction material over a short period of time if we wished.
SlyReaper wrote:Scientists create proper nanobots straight out of science-fiction.
Living in the future is brilliant.
Iulus Cofield wrote:Jesus, how often does that happen? Seems like the third time in the last year.
This article totally lacks context, this is actually just the Mossad initiation test. It only made the news because Aleeyan beat the record for the youngest recruit by 46 days. A record previously held by Michael Harari who bite the head off of a viper when two years and three months old.Djehutynakht wrote:http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Israel+toddler+chews+head+snake/6061344/story.html
A toddler in Israel was recently discovered in his room calmly chewing off the head of an extremely poisonous snake.
Silas wrote:Nobody who gets paid by the hour invents a cotton gin.
As proof, Morris notes that the "radically pro-abortion" Michelle Obama is honorary president of Girl Scouts of America, which "should give each of us reason to pause before our individual or collective endorsement of the organization."
Even worse, he wrote, only three of the 50 role models promoted by the Girl Scouts have even "a briefly-mentioned religious background."
"All the rest are feminists, lesbians, or Communists," he wrote.
After learning all this, he wrote, he pulled his two daughters out of the Girl Scouts and instead put them in American Heritage Girls Little Flowers, a parent-run group best described as a center for recovering Girl Scouts.
A Girl Scouts of America training program last year used the Planned Parenthood sex education pamphlet "Happy, Healthy, and Hot." The pamphlet instructs young girls not to think of sex as "just about vaginal or anal intercourse." "There is no right or wrong way to have sex. Just have fun, explore and be yourself!" it states. Although individual Girl Scout troops are not forced to follow this curriculum, many do. Liberal progressive troop-leaders will indoctrinate the girls in their troop according to the principles of Planned Parenthood, making Bishop Conley's warning true.
Yea, I was wondering if that was supposed to be "self described" or if the article writer was crazy...Rodion Raskolnikov wrote:This cannot be serious. Please tell me this article was copy-and-pasted from The Onion.After learning all this, he wrote, he pulled his two daughters out of the Girl Scouts and instead put them in American Heritage Girls Little Flowers, a parent-run group best described as a center for recovering Girl Scouts.
Angua wrote:Have you read the republican's letter though? http://www.journalgazette.net/article/20120220/BLOGS01/120229962/-1/blogs
There are such gems asA Girl Scouts of America training program last year used the Planned Parenthood sex education pamphlet "Happy, Healthy, and Hot." The pamphlet instructs young girls not to think of sex as "just about vaginal or anal intercourse." "There is no right or wrong way to have sex. Just have fun, explore and be yourself!" it states. Although individual Girl Scout troops are not forced to follow this curriculum, many do. Liberal progressive troop-leaders will indoctrinate the girls in their troop according to the principles of Planned Parenthood, making Bishop Conley's warning true.
PeteP wrote:Angua wrote:Have you read the republican's letter though? http://www.journalgazette.net/article/20120220/BLOGS01/120229962/-1/blogs
There are such gems asA Girl Scouts of America training program last year used the Planned Parenthood sex education pamphlet "Happy, Healthy, and Hot." The pamphlet instructs young girls not to think of sex as "just about vaginal or anal intercourse." "There is no right or wrong way to have sex. Just have fun, explore and be yourself!" it states. Although individual Girl Scout troops are not forced to follow this curriculum, many do. Liberal progressive troop-leaders will indoctrinate the girls in their troop according to the principles of Planned Parenthood, making Bishop Conley's warning true.
Is "There is no right or wrong way to have sex. Just have fun, explore and be yourself!" supposed to be an example of the horrible stuff they teach the girls? I know his circles are probably quite sex negative, but couldn't he find something which sounds at least bit shocking?
Dauric wrote:To the social conservative "Sex is Bad" crowd that -is- shocking. God made Tab P to go in slot V, putting it in slot A voids the warranty.
Zamfir wrote:Some slots do genuinely void the warranty though, both of your parts and of the slot. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vorwerk_(company)#Trivia
In 1985, Vorwerk sued the Chaos Computer Club (CCC), which had published on its Btx page an excerpt from a 1978 dissertation on “Penis Injuries When Masturbating with Vacuum Cleaners” that explicitly referred to the Kobold brand. Vorwerk feared for its reputation and brought an injunction according to which CCC would have to pay a penalty of 500,000 DM for any violation. When the dissertation supervisor and someone affected by the problem described introduced themselves to Vorwerk, they were able to convince the company of the seriousness of the source and Vorwerk withdrew its suit. In Germany, Vorwerk has been strongly associated with door-to-door sales at least since the launch of direct distribution of the Kobold vacuum cleaner. In his 1999 documentary film, Die Blume der Hausfrau, which achieved some success in German repertory cinemas, director Dominik Wessely portrayed the work of the Vorwerk sales advisers.
Djehutynakht wrote:http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Israel+toddler+chews+head+snake/6061344/story.html
A toddler in Israel was recently discovered in his room calmly chewing off the head of an extremely poisonous snake.
Fun fact: this is true for snakes because their venom is modified saliva. Generally, all the dangerous compounds are enzymes so they just become denatured by stomach acid.AvatarIII wrote:Djehutynakht wrote:http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Israel+toddler+chews+head+snake/6061344/story.html
A toddler in Israel was recently discovered in his room calmly chewing off the head of an extremely poisonous snake.
there's no such thing as a poisonous snake, venemous, yes, but poisonous no.
the difference being, it's perfectly safe to injest venom, but not poison, venom must be administered intravenously.
After learning all this, he wrote, he pulled his two daughters out of the Girl Scouts and instead put them in American Heritage Girls Little Flowers, a parent-run group best described as a center for recovering Girl Scouts.
The Mighty Thesaurus wrote:TrlstanC wrote:But, I'm still curious, did no one else ever learn about creationism in science class at some point, at least those who went to public school?
Sorry, we just learned science.
AvatarIII wrote:Djehutynakht wrote:http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Israel+toddler+chews+head+snake/6061344/story.html
A toddler in Israel was recently discovered in his room calmly chewing off the head of an extremely poisonous snake.
there's no such thing as a poisonous snake, venemous, yes, but poisonous no.
the difference being, it's perfectly safe to injest venom, but not poison, venom must be administered intravenously.
Belial wrote:I'm all outraged out. Call me when the violent rebellion starts.
Users browsing this forum: CorruptUser, Cousj001, eran_rathan, Heisenberg, Iulus Cofield, Izawwlgood, PeteP and 6 guests