Moderators: SecondTalon, Moderators General, Prelates
Spambot5546 wrote:Well...who used it? I'd sleep next to Felicia Day's used bacon.
So it seems like this was the plan all along, including the trailer for the collectors edition back in November which mentions an extra squadmate/mission.Belial wrote:I suspect the bioware rep misspoke, and that it actually ships with all new copies. Project 10 dollars (or whatever they call it, I forget) dictates that all EA games ship with 10 dollars worth of free DLC that has to be repurchased if you buy the game used. That tends to be how they go with day-one DLC.
Belial wrote:Right, but that happened essentially between games. I'm thinking having a prothean around should be changing some major shit during the game. But it can't have too massive an effect (lollerskates) and still be optional, can it?
Bioware wrote:Spoiler:
Random forum-goer wrote:Spoiler:
Uh, the Quarians noticed. (But only when you tried to bring it on their ship.)Xanthir wrote:Shepard spent the end of ME2 walking around with a Geth, the apparent scourge of the galaxy. Nobody cared. I think they're okay with your party members not mattering to the rest of the story.
Ryom wrote:Also please watch this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... 0vrJ-y2zM#!
If it was developed after the core game, how come there are dialogue files for the Prothean in the leaks?
He also complained about the blood dragon armor, and pre-order bonuses of different weapons. Basically, anything that's not an 'art asset' because those silly artists are the only ones that might have free time nearing a game's release (or in the month between the game being finalized and released?).Belial wrote:Wow, I sure did spend half an hour listening to some guy outline his purchasing preferences as though they were moral edicts.Ryom wrote:Also please watch this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... 0vrJ-y2zM#!
Gelsamel wrote:Thats interesting because I played Shepard as an asexual but apparently that isn't a valid way to play her so you just miss out on content instead.
Gelsamel wrote:Thats interesting because I played Shepard as an asexual but apparently that isn't a valid way to play her so you just miss out on content instead.
Gelsamel wrote:I really liked the first ME's story and setting. Then ME2 did the Shepard dying but not really dying thing, the "I'm engineered to be the perfect person" thing and the Reapers are Soylent Cyborgs thing (thereby removing everything that was awesome about them) and the last boss is a giant human skeleton thing. The gameplay was smoother but I disliked the reduction of the RPG elements, because that is always fun for me; building characters and collecting gear. But at least it was fun as a 3rd Person Shooter.
maybeagnostic wrote:the asari matron bartender with a krogan father
Belial wrote:Fun fact: it is very, very strongly implied that she is Liara's "Father".
Corroborated by her mentioning she had a pureblood daughter that she lost track of when relations with her mother went sour (which lines up pretty exactly with liara's story about Benezia), and the fact that the Shadow Broker's video files have a clip of her holding and looking at a small portrait of Liara.
It sortof makes Liara's sudden turn-for-the-badass make sense, doesn't it?
The firewalker missions for ME2 were pretty fun, at least it part because it controlled nothing like the mako. But they also weren't all faceless auto-generated planets with nothing except the exactly 3 landmarks.Chewbaccawacca wrote:Perhaps if they "fix" the Mako controls as well, so as to not make it so unbearable for the gamers who hated it in ME.
Belial wrote:I don't like tedium.
ME1 and ME2 also tried to give a certain urgency to the plot development which really didn't mesh with Shepard going to random out-of-the-way planets to explore for the sake of exploring. I think the planet descriptions are one of the best parts of the game and I'll be really sad if they're missing.Chewbaccawacca wrote:Now truthfully I'm not sure how this is going to play out in ME3 since from the start of the game (apparently) you're racing against the clock right at the get-go to save the galaxy from the Reapers, somehow I don't think that will allow for much down time throughout the game. More's the pity.
ME2 kind of did that. I had all upgrades and 350k+ of each resource (except eezo) left over after exploring about a third of the planets so for the rest of them I only read the descriptions and landed if I found missions.Belial wrote:Otherwise, I could utterly cope with just getting rid of resource-gathering entirely.
maybeagnostic wrote:I had all upgrades and 350k+ of each resource (except eezo) left over after exploring about a third of the planets so for the rest of them I only read the descriptions and landed if I found missions.
Chewbaccawacca wrote:maybeagnostic wrote:I had all upgrades and 350k+ of each resource (except eezo) left over after exploring about a third of the planets so for the rest of them I only read the descriptions and landed if I found missions.
That's so weird, a buddy of mine had the same experience. But I remember vividly how after searching planet after planet after planet (exhaustive grid pattern search 1-1.5 full planetary rotation) for hours at a time and only barely scraping enough resources to get all the upgrades. I don't know why there's such disparity between our experiences?
Belial wrote:That's charming, Nancy, but all I hear when you talk is a bunch of yippy dog sounds.
Belial wrote:Gelsamel wrote:Thats interesting because I played Shepard as an asexual but apparently that isn't a valid way to play her so you just miss out on content instead.
Well...yes? If you play asexual and aromantic, you're going to miss out on the relationship content, because the relationship is the content (it's not like it leads to new missions or items). I'm...not sure what you'd want to do about this? Are you suggesting that there should be a similar mini-plotline for asexuality? What would that entail? Using the time you're not banging freaky aliens to crochet an afghan?
This happens in ME2: Mordin has lines for people that don't trip any relationship flags.Gelsamel wrote:All that being said, yes, there should be content for the aromantic asexual as well. For instance more interactions and insights with other characters/crewpeople that are only available if you don't trip any relationship flags.
I think a major sore point was that it looked like the voice actors recorded the lines for gay relationships, and then it was decided to not include that content, rather than the content not existing in the first place. If they wrote and voiced a chaste relationship with Samara but then cut it, that'd be worse than never including it in the first place.Gelsamel wrote:I don't see why it is bad that homosexuals get the short straw (missing out on subplot content) rather than just a 'different straw' (different subplot content) while it's fine for asexuals or aromantics to get the short straw.
Vaniver wrote:This happens in ME2: Mordin has lines for people that don't trip any relationship flags.Gelsamel wrote:All that being said, yes, there should be content for the aromantic asexual as well. For instance more interactions and insights with other characters/crewpeople that are only available if you don't trip any relationship flags.
[edit 2]Wait a minute, you can have a chaste relationship with Samara. Does that count for your asexual subplot?
Another option for the aromantic Shepard might be friendship/camaraderie subplot.
Users browsing this forum: Drumheller769, Gelsamel, SirBryghtside and 3 guests