mpolo wrote:So, I guess the charge against Brook at the moment is for active lurking. Unless Amy can give us something more concrete.
I don't actively object to this lynch candidate, but I'm not going to start an unstoppable bandwagon until I hear some more.
Mostlynormal wrote: Perhaps a deadline would make people more active?
Azrael001 wrote:With a claim like "survivor" I have no problem at all lynching him. It smacks of trying to preemptively justify an independent result if examined.
BoomFrog wrote:Night has been six days now...
ForAllOfThis wrote:Brook's claim could indicate he's lying. Especially when you consider if he is lying, the real saffron (if a survivor/indie) would probably have no reason to out themselves to claim that Brook is lying. It's quite a clever character to choose if you wanted a safe claim.
_infina_ wrote:A sense of unease washes over them. Something was different, but everyone was still here.
ForAllOfThis wrote:Reavers tried to recruit me last night but failed, so I bring the unfortunate news that we still have a recruiter.
ForAllOfThis wrote:@roband hypotheticialy speaking, if you were saffron (and brook was lieing) you would have counter-claimed? I personally would have let scum have their fun, as well as most players. Especially when the goal is surviving, you don't want to piss off scum or town.
Reavers tried to recruit me last night but failed, so I bring the unfortunate news that we still have a recruiter.
BoomFrog wrote:And probably Chandani...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests