Moderators: jestingrabbit, Moderators General, Prelates
t1mm01994 wrote:Meh, I actually would have liked to see the votes on that one. It likely would have been a 9/1 with infina being the one, but it surely would be a nice way to call the bluff. Ah well. Fingers crossed I got it right on this one..
ConMan wrote:the neighbourhood’s favourite lizard
Adam H wrote:Angua analysis:
-Thinks Adam is scummy, wants t1mm to use strong leader. Seems to understand how NC could be bad in spies hands. Suggests Angua, rigwarl, and one other. Slightly scummy – she understands how spies can abuse NC, which might indicate that she was told how to use it in spy chat. Weak link with t1mm/infina/lataro (strong leader suggestion). Link with rigwarl.
Adam H wrote:-Will accept any team without Adam on it. Slightly scummy. She’d accept a GoP+Silknor+Lataro team?
Adam H wrote:-Doesn’t trust rigwarl, tells infina not to reject mission because they’ll lose. Scummy - she seems to know infina is town.[/spoiler]
Angua wrote:I'm pretty sure that if you reject the mission, we lose it anyway._infina_ wrote:Angua wrote:So, I'm thinking (assuming everyone is ok with mission 1) that we do me, t1mm and one other. Maybe boomfrog?
What does everyone else think?
I will again reject a mission with t1mm on it. At this point in time I would feel better if Lataro was on it instead of t1mm.
I'm not sure how much I trust rigwarl. I'll go for it if others think it's best though.
webby, am I allowed to give two powers to 1 person?
Spy-Rigwal would not want to bring this up.rigwarl wrote:In the meantime, I was wondering what people think of the fact of everyone accepting TMG's mission except infina who NC'd it.
Think about spy-t1mm+spy-Lataro if t1mm fails the mission while in the spotlight. Both are outed, and you and Angua are confirmed as resistance since t1mm wouldn't have to bite the bullet if there was a 2nd spy on the team. But if they pass and are trusted they can easily fail two of the next three missions.rigwarl wrote:Even though it would have been like a massive mistake to let M3 slide as a spy for t1mm IMO so I'm thinking like 99.8% t1mm = town,
Silas wrote:Nobody who gets paid by the hour invents a cotton gin.
Lataro wrote:An Angua KACEOY result on Tim would pretty much confirm him as absolute town, and make his result on rig likely true.
BoomFrog wrote:Alright, so I'm about 100% sure t1mm and Lataro are spies. Our only confirmation that t1mm is resistance comes from Lataro, but he doesn't need a well placed plot power to just lie about his original KACEOY result. If we put t1mm on this next mission and it fails and we assume that it was the 4th who failed it and still put t1mm on the last team then town loses. This is the spy plan. Look at the vote results for last mission. Everyone except infinia passed, which means the spies wanted that mission team.
BoomFrog wrote: Think about spy-t1mm+spy-Lataro if t1mm fails the mission while in the spotlight. Both are outed, and you and Angua are confirmed as resistance since t1mm wouldn't have to bite the bullet if there was a 2nd spy on the team. But if they pass and are trusted they can easily fail two of the next three missions.
Obviously, I'd much rather keep t1mm (and Lataro) completely off the mission. Failling this mission would out two spies, but it would also leave us with no fails left and two unkown spies. Also your forgetting about plant the evidence. If the spies have PtE they haven't had any reason to use it yet since both investigations have been in spy hands so far. I'd like, Angua, Rig, (2xnew guy), and Angua uses KACEOY on one of the new guys randomly decided by her. That lowers the chance of a spy power being useful to only 25%. If we pass the mission we do it again and win the game, if we fail we know a third spy 75% and have a good shot at keeping the final spy off the last two missions. Why do you think the last mission was so easy to get a team agreed upon but it still passed? Spies don't want that unless they get something out of it.rigwarl wrote:Anyway, in that case I'm thinking myself/t1mm/Angua/newguy with KACEOY played from Angua on newguy. Fail = obvious t1mm spy, the reason we can't do KACEOY on t1mm is if the Lataro/t1mm theory is true then they have 50% chance of having Secret Sabotage since they wouldn't have used it yet, whereas if it's not true then, ugh, slightly tricky, but chances are (not impossible though!) spies have already used SS.
Is this acceptable to you Boomfrog?
rigwarl wrote:Anyway, can you elaborate on how they would go about doing this bolded part?BoomFrog wrote:But if they pass and are trusted they can easily fail two of the next three missions.
You where prepared to walk right into it. When M2 failed you'd blame "extra" and then keep You, Angua, and t1mm and a new extra, then mission fails again, oops, gameover. Spy-t1mm is in a much better position after passing M1 then he would be if he failed it while under the spotlight. Actually if he had failed it under the spotlight I would be very worried about you and Angua as the naive assumption would be that you two must be resistance and that could be dangerous.rigwarl wrote:Honestly all the plot powers seem not so useful. If we do M2 with myself/t1mm/Angua/extra, KACEOY is basically worthless on this mission with 3 resistance, since derp I wonder who failed!?
Silas wrote:Nobody who gets paid by the hour invents a cotton gin.
BoomFrog wrote: Obviously, I'd much rather keep t1mm (and Lataro) completely off the mission. Failling this mission would out two spies, but it would also leave us with no fails left and two unkown spies. Also your forgetting about plant the evidence. If the spies have PtE they haven't had any reason to use it yet since both investigations have been in spy hands so far. I'd like, Angua, Rig, (2xnew guy), and Angua uses KACEOY on one of the new guys randomly decided by her. That lowers the chance of a spy power being useful to only 25%. If we pass the mission we do it again and win the game, if we fail we know a third spy 75% and have a good shot at keeping the final spy off the last two missions. Why do you think the last mission was so easy to get a team agreed upon but it still passed? Spies don't want that unless they get something out of it.
BoomFrog wrote:You where prepared to walk right into it.
BoomFrog wrote:Alright, so I'm about 100% sure t1mm and Lataro are spies. Our only confirmation that t1mm is resistance comes from Lataro, but he doesn't need a well placed plot power to just lie about his original KACEOY result. If we put t1mm on this next mission and it fails and we assume that it was the 4th who failed it and still put t1mm on the last team then town loses. This is the spy plan. Look at the vote results for last mission. Everyone except infinia passed, which means the spies wanted that mission team.
Convenient how Adam distributed Plot Powers to spies, from my PoV. Regardless, "t1mm goes on every mission ever" is a slippery slope argument at best. If you follow my lead (rig/me/ang/tmg/lataro) I'll take the blame on me if the mission fails, because it probably won't.BoomFrog wrote:Imagine a world in which Lataro is a spy. Spy-Lataro picks out the other spy on M4 to give a pass result to, it's the best move spy-Lataro could make. t1mm confirms Rig and the team that includes t1mm passes M1. Now t1mm goes on every mission for the rest of the game and gets to fail them all. If they have SS they didn't need to use it on M4 so they still have it saved to make t1mm look innocent for all future missions. And if they have Deception then OC will be useless as well as we will have to be blatant about who to give it to, to check t1mm. Convenient that the two people who could check t1mm or Lataro have been labeled as spies by t1mm.
BoomFrog wrote:t1mm is way to confident about things he shouldn't be if he was really resistance. Anyone who plays with infinia knows that he is easy to piss-off, but t1mm is sure that infinia is scum, which pisses infinia off, which "proves" t1mm is right. And t1mm shouldn't have any reason to trust Lataro. A spy-Lataro could have confirmed resistance-t1mm but t1mm never considers that and just assumes Lataro is resistance. Lataro has said very little this game, and almost none of it helpful, I don't see how t1mm has anything more then a neutral read on him. Also, t1mm has labeled me a spy but not once said any actual reason he suspects me.
BoomFrog wrote:This exact same thing happened in neighborhood mafia. t1mm put forth a very confident theory that I and mpolo where the scum them when we were actually two of the last three town. Nothing we said could convince MN of our innocence since t1mm spoke first and loudest. All of mpolo and my defenses looked like scum manipulation.
BoomFrog wrote:Ah, neighbourhood... Those were the times. Thing is, I faked having a read there, and I actually have a read here. I pulled a similar stunt in Hogwarts... but doesn't mean I'm scum here. I've simply seen very little to contradict my hypothesis.
Anyway, my recommendation for powers is absolutely do not give NC to t1mm or Lataro. With NC in their hands they can guarantee fail a mission as Lataro will the the 3rd mission leader and pick any team he wants. I'd give KACEOY (and NC) to Angua. OM is corner case useful at best but I think it's better on a spy, so Lataro or t1mm I guess. Spies probably already have ways to coordinate votes if they want to, we don't want to give them more info about resistance votes.
BoomFrog wrote:Anyway, my recommendation for powers is absolutely do not give NC to t1mm or Lataro. With NC in their hands they can guarantee fail a mission as Lataro will the the 3rd mission leader and pick any team he wants. I'd give KACEOY (and NC) to Angua. OM is corner case useful at best but I think it's better on a spy, so Lataro or t1mm I guess. Spies probably already have ways to coordinate votes if they want to, we don't want to give them more info about resistance votes.
t1mm01994 wrote:Then again, would you point out where I used this, or where I even pushed for Lataro to be on /anything/, or receive any plotpower?
Wow...t1mm01994 wrote: If you follow my lead (rig/me/ang/tmg/lataro) I'll take the blame on me if the mission fails, because it probably won't.
You've frequently off-handedly stated that you'd pick Silknor over me multiple times, I'd dig up the quote but I don't want this to turn into a quote sniping war.You were on M4. I trust Lataro (will go over that later), which leaves 2 spies from the 3 of GoP, silk, and you. I've said many times that I don't /really/ care who is scum there.
Silas wrote:Nobody who gets paid by the hour invents a cotton gin.
Spies would have been crazy to fail the last mission. Especially if t1mm and either you or angua are spies as I suspect. If the mission failed, we'd have a clear path to victory. But now since it passed, here's what's going to happen if you have your way: Angua+Rigwarl+T1mm+new guy go on mission, which will fail (or pass if spies are afraid of KACEOY). And we'd go on the same mission after that without KACEOY and it would fail. So we'd suspect new guy or whoever KACEOY was used on, and then go on another mission with Angua+Rigwarl+t1mm+newguy#2+newguy#3, which would fail and we lose.rigwarl wrote:Adam H can you clarify why you wouldn't want myself, t1mm, or Angua on the team after we're basically confirmed resistance (spies would have to be insane not to fail last mission, as it would leave 3 unknown spies- 4 even if not t1mm, since you guys wouldn't even know if it was me or Angua- to detect by M5 and pretty much seal a victory).
You are just so bad at this, aren't you. First, I distributed the important plot power to YOU. Nice POV you got there, you damn spy. Second, it's "t1mm goes on TWO missions" not "t1mm goes on every mission ever". If lataro fails, you'll take the heat? You are a horrible town player at best, andan obvi-spy at worst. My bet is on obvi-spy.t1mm01994 wrote:Convenient how Adam distributed Plot Powers to spies, from my PoV. Regardless, "t1mm goes on every mission ever" is a slippery slope argument at best. If you follow my lead (rig/me/ang/tmg/lataro) I'll take the blame on me if the mission fails, because it probably won't.
I'll accept if I have no choice. Stop it with the strawmen, seriously.rigwarl wrote:You literally cannot use your plan of rejecting anything with me, t1mm, or infina on it, since we are the next 3 mission leaders so one of us will pretty much definitely be on the next mission.
Adam H wrote:I'll accept if I have no choice. Stop it with the strawmen, seriously.rigwarl wrote:You literally cannot use your plan of rejecting anything with me, t1mm, or infina on it, since we are the next 3 mission leaders so one of us will pretty much definitely be on the next mission.
She didn't warn anything, she just says "it's interesting that Adam HJ is leader and we have NC." and leaves it at that. She's obviously not thinking through how NC is harmful, she already knows how it's bad.t1mm01994 wrote:Umm.. She is scummy because she warns people to be cautious about spreading NC? Me no understands.Adam H wrote:Angua analysis:
-Thinks Adam is scummy, wants t1mm to use strong leader. Seems to understand how NC could be bad in spies hands. Suggests Angua, rigwarl, and one other. Slightly scummy – she understands how spies can abuse NC, which might indicate that she was told how to use it in spy chat. Weak link with t1mm/infina/lataro (strong leader suggestion). Link with rigwarl.
The explanation makes it worse than I thought. She TOLD everyone that she'd automatically accept a GOP+Silknor+Lataro team, and we knew we could trust it.t1mm01994 wrote:This had been explained later on.Adam H wrote:-Will accept any team without Adam on it. Slightly scummy. She’d accept a GoP+Silknor+Lataro team?
Um. You say it yourself. Do you agree that if infina rejected the mission, and scum followed, then that's 5 rejections? Cause that means infina is town.t1mm01994 wrote:Adam H wrote:-Doesn’t trust rigwarl, tells infina not to reject mission because they’ll lose. Scummy - she seems to know infina is town.[/spoiler]
What. No, but seriously, just what.Angua wrote:I'm pretty sure that if you reject the mission, we lose it anyway._infina_ wrote:I will again reject a mission with t1mm on it. At this point in time I would feel better if Lataro was on it instead of t1mm.Angua wrote:So, I'm thinking (assuming everyone is ok with mission 1) that we do me, t1mm and one other. Maybe boomfrog?
What does everyone else think?
I'm not sure how much I trust rigwarl. I'll go for it if others think it's best though.
This is, appearantly, a "scummy" post, because she seems to know that infina is town. Adam, could you indicate /where/ she indicates infina is town? She's pretty sure that if he rejects the mission [and scum follows], we [she and other townies, I think she meant to say there] lose it anyway. I.. Don't see why she's scummy, to be fair.
At this point in time, I plan on rejecting every mission with rigwarl, t1mm, and infina in it. This may change depending on if the missions get rejected. For instance, if a mission is surprisingly rejected then that indicates that spies did not like the mission team. And if it is accepted then it doesn't matter what I vote.rigwarl wrote:So can you clarify your plan if that isn't right then? Because based on WHAT YOU WROTE, you're saying: if I propose a mission with myself on it, you want to see it rejected. t1mm proposes a mission with himself on it, you want it rejected too. Is this true? If so, then you're basically saying you want to let _infina_ propose whatever team he wants that every single player must accept. This plan seems a bit strange to me, but please explain how this is beneficial to resistance.
Adam H wrote:Spies would have been crazy to fail the last mission. Especially if t1mm and either you or angua are spies as I suspect. If the mission failed, we'd have a clear path to victory. But now since it passed, here's what's going to happen if you have your way: Angua+Rigwarl+T1mm+new guy go on mission, which will fail (or pass if spies are afraid of KACEOY). And we'd go on the same mission after that without KACEOY and it would fail. So we'd suspect new guy or whoever KACEOY was used on, and then go on another mission with Angua+Rigwarl+t1mm+newguy#2+newguy#3, which would fail and we lose.rigwarl wrote:Adam H can you clarify why you wouldn't want myself, t1mm, or Angua on the team after we're basically confirmed resistance (spies would have to be insane not to fail last mission, as it would leave 3 unknown spies- 4 even if not t1mm, since you guys wouldn't even know if it was me or Angua- to detect by M5 and pretty much seal a victory).
The right play is for spies to pass the last mission.
Here I was just saying that I thought it would be interesting if we got the no confidence power because the mission leader was a spy. At the time I didn't realise that rejecting a mission lead to the next person in line being leader.Adam H wrote:She didn't warn anything, she just says "it's interesting that Adam HJ is leader and we have NC." and leaves it at that. She's obviously not thinking through how NC is harmful, she already knows how it's bad.t1mm01994 wrote:Umm.. She is scummy because she warns people to be cautious about spreading NC? Me no understands.Adam H wrote:Angua analysis:
-Thinks Adam is scummy, wants t1mm to use strong leader. Seems to understand how NC could be bad in spies hands. Suggests Angua, rigwarl, and one other. Slightly scummy – she understands how spies can abuse NC, which might indicate that she was told how to use it in spy chat. Weak link with t1mm/infina/lataro (strong leader suggestion). Link with rigwarl.
Not sure how this is a bad thing - I assumed that we'd have a fairly rational team, and that as Adam H was team leader, I was going to reject the mission out of hand. Why would someone make a GOP-Silknor-Lataro team?The explanation makes it worse than I thought. She TOLD everyone that she'd automatically accept a GOP+Silknor+Lataro team, and we knew we could trust it.t1mm01994 wrote:This had been explained later on.Adam H wrote:-Will accept any team without Adam on it. Slightly scummy. She’d accept a GoP+Silknor+Lataro team?
Adam H wrote:If t1mm, lataro, and rigwarl/Angua are not 3 of the 4 spies, I would be astounded. Their buddying is incredibly thick and irrational.
Adam H wrote:At this point in time, I plan on rejecting every mission with rigwarl, t1mm, and infina in it. This may change depending on if the missions get rejected. For instance, if a mission is surprisingly rejected then that indicates that spies did not like the mission team. And if it is accepted then it doesn't matter what I vote.
No. I think if the last mission had failed, we would win because we'd leave off angua, rigwarl, t1mm, and lataro from this upcoming mission.rigwarl wrote:I actually was super-confused for awhile why you thought not failing last mission as either myself or Angua was even remotely smart. However after re-reading several times, I think you didn't realize there are only 2 more failures needed for spies to win (would only be 1 if last mission was failed). So yea, hopefully you agree now that Angua/myself are like 99.9% resistance (does anyone else question this?)
Yup, that's the way it looks to me.rigwarl wrote:Adam H, let me get this straight- you are saying that, if you were a resistance member, you would have liked it if Mission 1 failed because it is worse for you if spies pass it. Is that correct?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest