I suspect you of being an original Reaver since your defense of Mr. Face has stuck out to me and it started on D1. If FAOT is believed then that means there is still recruiting. If there is still recruiting then I have reason to believe that you may still be a Reaver. If he is lying then there is likely no more original Reavers but he wants to direct attention at not-originally-town people. So if he is lying then your probably not a Reaver and I do think he is lying.Mostlynormal wrote:I don't understand this. Why would FAOT being beleived heap suspicion on me?BoomFrog wrote:Although presumably FAOT expected to be believed, and if he was believed then that would pile suspicion onto MN not take it off. Okay, suspicion of MN slightly retracted.
BoomFrog wrote:Yeah... so anyway. Back to actually playing. could we lynch MN or FAOT or does someone want to make a argument for a third candidate? Also, Another little tidbit, old chap MN, you forgot to unvote yourself.
BoomFrog wrote:I suspect you [MostlyNormal] of being a original Reaver since your defense of Mr. Face has stuck out to me and it started on D1. If FAOT is believed then that means there is still recruiting. If there is still recruiting then I have reason to believe that you may still be a Reaver. If he is lying then there is likely no more original Reavers but he wants to direct attention at not-originally-town people. So if he is lying then your probably not a Reaver and I do think he is lying.
Mostlynormal wrote:I also disagree with Amy (small newbie though HULK, going up against the psychic veteran). I don't see why someone would be that specific in they's rolespec if they really did have that specific role, especially if it be'd sort of a "out there" possibility. I see it as more idle rolespec, feeling out possibilities. Also, looking back, I think there be'd actually people who discussed the possibility of reavers converting people before he, so really I don't see anything out of the ordinary.
Azrael001 wrote:Mostlynormal and Amy be the 2 most prominent unclaimed people right now. Amy's be'd very helpful, and brook hath not be'd. FAOT be acting like a liar, who may or may not still be town. If HULK right and he be a liar, and he be still town, then HULK sorry, but I think that there be good odds that he be not.
That sprayed, I think that we could be aiming for original Reavers first. This leads I 2
Mostlynormal wrote:It's funny, I don't actually think FAOT's original post was an overreaction at all, more like an observation, but I find his last post a huge overreaction. You can "see where this is going," so you're going to claim straightaway? You only have one vote on you! Sure, some other people are expressing suspicion, but still, one vote, with three days left in the day! You couldn't have waited it out a bit more before claiming?
I don't really buy that. FoS: FAOT
Sungura wrote:day 1 does not think FAOTs reaction is overkill and defends him pretty heavily. Day 2 continues agreeing with FAOT
Sungura wrote:also 'cause I was curious here is a vote count (non-official)
and we have about 4 real-life days left for this game-day
2- faot (misnomer, amy)
2- MN (az, faot)
Yes you are against FAOT but at the same time lots of phrases pinged me as you being for him.Mostlynormal wrote:That would sound perfectly reasonable, except you didn't say I gave you the general impression of supporting FAOT, you gave specific examples in places that were obviously (even while looking at only my posts) not supportive of FAOT. The quoted post and one where I said I was willing to treat him as confirmed town for the day were the only two posts I made on FAOT day 1. Neither of them could be reasonably thought of as "heavily defending" FAOT. Perhaps saying that I sort of defended FAOT day one and expressed agreement with one of his statements day 3 would be mostly true. But I just don't see how you could've posted such specific accusations without the intent to deceive.
As far as doing re-reads getting Amy lynched, I don't have experience with that. Could someone I'm not currently voting for confirm or deny that?
Basically, I can understand mistakes, but you didn't give a general commentary, you made specific claims that were obviously false on examination. I'm just not quite buying it.Sungura wrote:day 1 does not think FAOTs reaction is overkill and defends him pretty heavily. Day 2 continues agreeing with FAOT
This is what I have trouble with. It is not simply saying I was an FAOT supporter, it is making false/misleading statements.
Also, I realize this post could sound like a lot of OMGUS. I'm not trying to do that. I think I've defended myself adequately. I wouldn't even mind vague suspicion, because I haven't played perfectly this game. But Amy made pretty specific statements that were just plain wrong. I find that scummy.
Azrael001 wrote:FAOT is my number two choice for a lynch because he's got some really bizarre power claims. MN however is unclaimed, and therefore much more likely to be one of the original Reavers (Amy is too, but has been helpful enough that I'm going to ignore that for now). He's also been acting really scummy. FAOT has been acting weird, and suspicious, but just this side of scummy I think. I really don't see how he could possibly be a better target than MN.
ForAllOfThis wrote:EBWOP: Post posted before I finished. Stupid laptop.
I made myself an easy target today by playing open and honestly, so when I flip town tomorrow you really need to look at the people jumping to vote for me on the sole reason I was protected from a reaver recruit. Because, it's absolutely BS reasoning.
Misnomer wrote:ForAllOfThis wrote:I was informed when someone attempted to kill me as well, but wasn't bandwagoned for that.
Ah, but I wasn't in the game at that point.
Misnomer wrote:Incidentally, are we certain that more original reavers are out there? FAOT's claims aside, is there anything else which indicates that they should still exist? I'm still playing catch-up with the setup here, so apologies if I've missed something obvious.
A sense of unease washes over them. Something was different, but everyone was still here.
ForAllOfThis wrote:It would be better I die and the reaver doctor remain hidden. Why would you suggest outting our only known defense against the reavers?
Angua wrote:When is the deadline?
roband wrote:Well the rules say that day ends at hammer. And (having now read back) what with there being 10 active players, didn't that just happen?
Users browsing this forum: dfgfgfgy and 2 guests