Moderators: Moderators General, Magistrates, Prelates
Huh. How big is that number, relatively speaking? I ask because in my life I've encountered possibly one person that would have a story like this. More than a few heterosexually married bisexuals, but they still identify as such. (Of my maternal grandmother's seven genetic descendants, two are straight, two are gay, and three are bisexual. The bisexuals all married heteronormatively).Vaniver wrote:When I came out as gay, I expected to hear a lot of "it's a phase," but I was surprised by the number of people that told me "it's a phase that I went through," which is relevant information that decreased my expectation that I was going to be gay for all of my life (it's still above 95% that that's the case, but it's less than 100%.).
drash wrote:Huh. How big is that number, relatively speaking? I ask because in my life I've encountered possibly one person that would have a story like this. More than a few heterosexually married bisexuals, but they still identify as such. (Of my maternal grandmother's seven genetic descendants, two are straight, two are gay, and three are bisexual. The bisexuals all married heteronormatively).Vaniver wrote:When I came out as gay, I expected to hear a lot of "it's a phase," but I was surprised by the number of people that told me "it's a phase that I went through," which is relevant information that decreased my expectation that I was going to be gay for all of my life (it's still above 95% that that's the case, but it's less than 100%.).
The coming out process for me did have a sort of equivalent- people would be suddenly honest about things they would normally keep hidden, often quite random. They would tell me about abortions they'd had, unfaithfullness, accidental pregnancies... I can only speculate that they saw my coming out as an emotionally intimate act and tried to respond in kind, even though that was sort of the opposite of the point.
Amie wrote:Cathy, I now declare you to be an awesome person, by the powers vested in me by nobody, really.
yurell wrote:We need fewer homoeopaths, that way they'll be more potent!
In relative numbers, I believe it was everyone who mentioned the 'phase' bit. In absolute numbers, it was between 2 and 4.drash wrote:Huh. How big is that number, relatively speaking?
I'm curious why you put the "normatively" in there.drash wrote:The bisexuals all married heteronormatively).
This is generally how people behave about intimate things.drash wrote:I can only speculate that they saw my coming out as an emotionally intimate act and tried to respond in kind, even though that was sort of the opposite of the point.
To distinguish from alternative arrangements such as polyamorous or open relationships, and to summon up a host of implications about external social pressures and conformity that the word "heterosexual" doesn't necessarily trigger. I worry that bisexuals' apparent high skew towards heterosexual monogamy is forced by the social and political burdens that tend to be placed on homosexual couples.Vaniver wrote:I'm curious why you put the "normatively" in there.drash wrote:The bisexuals all married heteronormatively).
My sexual orientation is not a particularly intimate facet of my identity- even when I'm not with a partner or date in public, I'm comfortable wearing accessories that advertise the fact. It's part of my "brand", as they say. So it's interesting to see whether people interpret self-outings as a sharing of secrets, rather than as part of a process wherein the secrecy is eliminated. It tracked more closely with their degree of comfort with gay people than it did with our depth of friendship- my (amicably-) ex-girlfriend of seven years merely congratulated me and offered support, but casual acquaintances dropped a few bombs on me.Vaniver wrote:This is generally how people behave about intimate things.drash wrote:I can only speculate that they saw my coming out as an emotionally intimate act and tried to respond in kind, even though that was sort of the opposite of the point.
Well, also, if only 10% of girls are going to be possibly attracted to me, and 90% of guys are, then my chance of ending up with a guy instead of a girl is much higher, even if I am equally attracted to people of both genders.drash wrote:To distinguish from alternative arrangements such as polyamorous or open relationships, and to summon up a host of implications about external social pressures and conformity that the word "heterosexual" doesn't necessarily trigger. I worry that bisexuals' apparent high skew towards heterosexual monogamy is forced by the social and political burdens that tend to be placed on homosexual couples.Vaniver wrote:I'm curious why you put the "normatively" in there.drash wrote:The bisexuals all married heteronormatively).
LE4d wrote:have you considered becoming an electron
Monika wrote:*hugs for Jessica*
What can I do as a cis queer woman to combat anti-trans misconceptions and hate among the mentioned groups? Will it work?
doogly wrote:On a scale of Mr Rogers to Fascism, how mean do you think we're being?
Belial wrote:My goal is to be the best brain infection any of you have ever had.
lanicita wrote:IMO, the point of this thread and the LGBT community in whole is to let people be who they are, and be with who they love. When you start to talk about specific relationships as "heteronormative," you start to degrade that mission. Society, and the way we are raised to think about and talk about romantic relationships, are all highly heteronormative, but my relationship is just heterosexual.
Amie wrote:Cathy, I now declare you to be an awesome person, by the powers vested in me by nobody, really.
yurell wrote:We need fewer homoeopaths, that way they'll be more potent!
It's okay! I was talking more to drash, because they did purposely choose the word "heteronormative". It didn't offend me, but it also didn't seem like an accurate word to describe any relationship.Cathy wrote:lanicita wrote:IMO, the point of this thread and the LGBT community in whole is to let people be who they are, and be with who they love. When you start to talk about specific relationships as "heteronormative," you start to degrade that mission. Society, and the way we are raised to think about and talk about romantic relationships, are all highly heteronormative, but my relationship is just heterosexual.
Sorry lanicita! For some reason off the top of my head I just wrote hetero-normative and not heterosexual. I did not mean to cause offense by that.
It saddens me that my mom was so relieved that I married a man instead of a woman.
LE4d wrote:have you considered becoming an electron
Ok, I've gotten the random comments, but... criminal history? How does that play out?Brace wrote:As a visibly trans person I've had people on the street come up to me and share intimate secrets, often about a criminal history on their part. It's been... bizarre.
Oregonaut wrote:You are a fucking idiot. (Insult.)
You say that you disapprove of sex before marriage, but you are fucking that idiot. (Ad hominem.)
You say that you disapprove of sex outside of marriage, but you are fucking your mom. (Ad mominem.)
PerchloricAcid wrote:However, I've never actually told my family about this. I'm not sure how they'd react at all. I've never felt any pressure to tell them that, probably because I'm currently in a heterosexual relationship [that they, btw, do not accept, because he's, they say, a different nationality![]()
].
would your family be more upset if your partner was of the "right" nationality but of the "wrong" gender?
PM 2Ring wrote:would your family be more upset if your partner was of the "right" nationality but of the "wrong" gender?
Mighty Jalapeno wrote:An actual cloud... full of lesbians.
*hugs*Azrael001 wrote:Spoiler'd Rant:Spoiler:
doogly wrote:On a scale of Mr Rogers to Fascism, how mean do you think we're being?
Belial wrote:My goal is to be the best brain infection any of you have ever had.
Azrael001 wrote:Spoiler'd Rant:Spoiler:
Mighty Jalapeno wrote:An actual cloud... full of lesbians.
LE4d wrote:have you considered becoming an electron
lanicita wrote:I just came out to my whole grad school class
Vaniver wrote:Harvard is a hedge fund that runs the most prestigious dating agency in the world, and incidentally employs famous scientists to do research.
afuzzyduck wrote:ITS MEANT TO BE FLUTTERSHY BUT I JUST SEE AAERIELE! CURSE YOU FORA!
LE4d wrote:have you considered becoming an electron
You, sir, name? wrote:If you have over 26 levels of nesting, you've got bigger problems ... than variable naming.
suffer-cait wrote:it might also be interesting to note here that i don't like 5 fingers. they feel too bulky.
doogly wrote:On a scale of Mr Rogers to Fascism, how mean do you think we're being?
Belial wrote:My goal is to be the best brain infection any of you have ever had.
Amie wrote:Cathy, I now declare you to be an awesome person, by the powers vested in me by nobody, really.
yurell wrote:We need fewer homoeopaths, that way they'll be more potent!
doogly wrote:On a scale of Mr Rogers to Fascism, how mean do you think we're being?
Belial wrote:My goal is to be the best brain infection any of you have ever had.
Users browsing this forum: 653ichf5s, axockycoall, Bakstoola, Bkppiw39, Farpappestals, hflsslo, mqmsju22, shealtket, Slageammalymn, Tebychacy and 8 guests