Moderators: Moderators General, Magistrates, Prelates
Angua wrote:Sodium chloride is probably cheaper.
Also, if you start messing with the potassium content of foods, a lot of the heart and renal patients out there are going to be on even more restricted diets.
Angua wrote:Potassium concentrations in the blood have to be controlled a lot more than sodium concentrations - you only need to have a couple of millimolars off with potassium to lead to noticeable heart problems, whereas with sodium you have a lot more leeway. I don't know how tightly controlled sodium restriction is in those patients, but it's probably a lot less restricted than potassium, as a lot of the drugs treating that sort of thing are interfering with potassium already, so they have even less leeway with stuff.
Orlando wrote:The Moomin wrote:NotAllThere wrote:Title: When they moved production from New Zealand to the UK and switched from the runny white centers to the thick, frosting-like filling, it got way harder to cook them scrambled.
Try them deep fried in batter.
( Apparently available in chipshops across the UK. It was on the menu on one I saw in N. Wales, but that was twenty years ago, maybe things have got healthier ).
I've only ever encountered deep fried creme eggs in one chip shop, and for every one sold money was donated to charity. I think deep fried mars bars are more commonplace. It was exceedingly gooey.
Personally, I prefer the creme egg bars as they have a better chocolate to goo ratio.
Kindly point me in the general direction of this chip shop, my good comrade, so that I may pay obeisance to the jiggly hedonistic god of saturated fats.
All this talk of Cadbury and healthfulness is making me want chocolate for breakfast. Good work, guys.
robocock wrote:Girl look at that body.
Sofie wrote:...You won't ever overeat on water...
SpitValve wrote:...I guess I just figured that the centres went hard if you left them for too long...
Um, this post feels devoid of content. Good luck?
For comparison, that means that if the cabbage guy from Avatar: The Last Airbender filled up his cart with lettuce instead, it would be about a quarter of a lethal dose.
BobTheElder wrote:Just to clarify something- Cadbury do not make 'nice' chocolate. Nor do they make 'good' chocolate. They make cheap, crappy, synthetic chocolate.
RyanfaeScotland wrote:I thought the same thing here in the UK! Can't believe they actually changed it intentionally. I thought I was just having a run of bad luck getting, oh god sorry about this, bad eggs, don't think I'll eat them any more now that I know they're all like that.
AvatarIII wrote:talking of salt, why don't more foods use potassium salt instead of sodium salt? sodium is important but many people have too much, but potassium is important too and is something many people don't get enough of. and the max RDA of potassium (3500mg - 5600mg) is over twice as high as sodium (1600mg - 2400mg)
therita wrote:You're doing it wrong if you eat Cadbury made anywhere other then Australia.
ausmax wrote:I'm unimpressed. There are 170 calories in a cadbury egg and 150 calories in a 12 oz can of Dr. pepper. Singling out soda as particularly unhealthy has been going on for a while, and doesn't really have much science behind it. Drinking a Dr. Pepper with dinner and not having dessert is roughly the equivalent of eating one cadbury egg for dessert (which in my experience is smaller than most desserts). If you'd rather eat candy than drink soda, more power to you, but there's really no difference in the amount of empty calories you would get from either activity.
AvatarIII wrote:How runny were they before? I can't remember them being any different from the kind of consistency they have now.

The fact that sodium is seen as a "bad for you in excess" substance, grouped with calories and fat on food labels, when potassium, which like you say needs more control than sodium, is often put alongside vitamin content on food labels, seems crazy to me.
Note my following "if you eat as much as you want". You can indeed be forced to take too much, my point is you don't want to do that. Wheras people do want to eat too much soda, chips, Cadbury Eggs etc.These people would disagree, well if they weren't dead. - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_pois ... able_cases
Sofie wrote:...Note my following "if you eat as much as you want". You can indeed be forced to take too much, my point is you don't want to do that...
zano wrote:robocock wrote:Girl look at that body.
Finally someone picked up the ball.
RyanfaeScotland wrote:AvatarIII wrote:How runny were they before? I can't remember them being any different from the kind of consistency they have now.
They used to more of a gooey liquid, the ones I have had recently seem to have more of a thicker 'fluffier' consistency to them. It's hard to describe but I think the difference in these images gets across what I'm saying. I'm not sure what the images are actually describing in context on their sites, I'm just using them because I think they show the difference I think there is between the eggs I remember and the eggs I have been buying.
Old, runny eggs -
Newer, 'fluffier' eggs -
Of course it looks like the top image is an idealised version and the bottom is a 'real life' picture but hopefully it gets across what I'm trying to say.
EDIT - This photo on flicker shows the fluffy egg even better http://www.flickr.com/photos/princess_of_llyr/3308434970/sizes/m/in/photostream/ and the article http://www.thecandyenthusiast.com/index.php/Spring_Summer_Theme/cadbury_creme_egg/ where the image is from says that she/he bought more eggs in search of the creamy flowing centre and got them. Interesting....
TheoGB wrote:cuccir wrote:The biggest revelation of this comic is that they have Cadbury's (Creme) Eggs outside the UK... I kinda thought that Cadbury's was unheard of in the rest of the world!
Britain had that Empire; Cadbury still ship to it!
(Although, I didn't think the US had European-style chocolate much so I was surprised too.)
Sofie wrote:The thing is that when you stick to what humans are used to eating, the concept of "eating in moderation" becomes as stupid as "breathing in moderation". Aside from polar bear, it's practically impossible to overload on vitamin A from eating liver, but if you take vitamin A pills it's easy. You won't ever overeat on water, meat, veggies if you eat as much as you want. If you need to moderate your eating of something, that's a good indicator that you shouldn't be eating it in the first place. http://www.gnolls.org/2074/why-snack-fo ... ck-appeal/

You won't ever overeat on... veggies if you eat as much as you want.
ausmax wrote:I'm unimpressed. There are 170 calories in a cadbury egg and 150 calories in a 12 oz can of Dr. pepper. Singling out soda as particularly unhealthy has been going on for a while, and doesn't really have much science behind it. Drinking a Dr. Pepper with dinner and not having dessert is roughly the equivalent of eating one cadbury egg for dessert (which in my experience is smaller than most desserts). If you'd rather eat candy than drink soda, more power to you, but there's really no difference in the amount of empty calories you would get from either activity.
Okay, let me draw you a picture. It's not about anything specific, just the general idea. For optimal health, how much should you consume of this item:I guess I'm a moderation kinda guy, eat what you want to eat in moderation and you'll be fine, even cyanide, knives and the others you listed above. (Of course given the small amounts that it takes to kill you of these things then moderation is going to be such a tiny amount it's really a wonder why you'd bother but that's not the point, the point is anything in moderation is fine.)

What humans could get didn't include grains, vegetable oils, soy and other new foods. And that matters because plants make pesticides to defend themselves. And we're pests, who haven't adapted to deal with them beyond not immediately dying.jqavins wrote:Nonsense. "What humans are used to eating" is whatever they can get with enough calories to keep them going.
Again wrong. Hunter-gatherers spend only 4-5 hours a day on food. Of course, avoiding excess wasn't a challenge either, because when you eat nutritious food, you get sated.Throughout most of history (and all of pre-history) and in most of the world it was mostly impossible to overeat; the challange is to get enough calories, not to avoid excess.
I'm not talking about "just one more"; I'm talking about eating so much your health suffers because of it.You certainly can overeat on lusious, red, deliciously fatty meat, you can easily overeat on sweet, juicey, yummy fruits. It's hard (but possible) to overeat on veggies; how many people have you met who have difficulty resisting just one more radish?
Go watch this, or read this. Saturated fat is nothing to be scared of.The sugar in soda and Cadbury Eggs isn't wonderful, but it's the 3.5g of saturated fat in a Cadbury Egg that scares me. At least soda doesn't have that.
What humans could get didn't include grains, vegetable oils, soy and other new foods. And that matters because plants make pesticides to defend themselves. And we're pests, who haven't adapted to deal with them beyond not immediately dying.
anandus wrote:Why is there the metric system (grams) in the first panel and the imperial system (ounces? ozzies?) in the second panel?
It's a bit confusing
AvatarIII wrote:...but you can easily buy potassium salt in the supermarket...
lesmith11 wrote:therita wrote:You're doing it wrong if you eat Cadbury made anywhere other then Australia.
Considering Cadbury was founded in the UK why would I be doing it wrong?
BrianB wrote:AvatarIII wrote:...but you can easily buy potassium salt in the supermarket...
That "Lite Salt" as they call it is actually an excellent fluxing agent when melting aluminum (yes, it is spelled correctly) in your garage at home. 2 Teaspoons per 4 pounds of scrap aluminum brings all the impurities right to the top of the crucible.
Now you know.....
Return to Individual XKCD Comic Threads
Users browsing this forum: Eoink, lmjb1964, snowyowl, WeMbrerveguet, XonqNopp and 30 guests