So... who will be blamed? I imagine Snark will gather some suspicion, but that that might die off with an argument like "scum isn't usually that aggressive." I expect those who passively agreed with him to face much greater trouble.
Turtle protected Snark, as expected, with a 3-0 vote. Nothing else nonpublic and exciting to report, other than Adam H making a quick "here's where my suspicions lie" message for his turtlemates:
Adam H wrote:OK good luck then.
Here's all the stuff I would have said yesterday if I had the time:
If webby doesn't die, don't discount the possibility that snark and webby are scummates. But I'd be surprised if webby doesn't die.
It's a really bad argument to say that "any lynch is better than no lynch", so I very suspicious of misnomer and TMG (and whoever else said something along those lines). Lynching town is obviously worse than not lynching anyone. Especially in this game, where we more or less determine who the scum kills based on who we investigate.
Mod Note: I realized I wasn't clear enough on the Bird Party action, so I had to make a decision. The unclear thing: I never said whether the recipient is told who the target was. I went with "yes, let's say who it was", since I felt I was implying that and since it's weak enough as it is. (Not that it mattered tonight, since the recipient knew which way the Bird vote was going.)