xkcd

by **orangedragonfire** » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:57 pm UTC

Odin has won a duel against Ky. Odin wins 6 points, Ky loses 4 points.

I cast my vote in favor of Kyreles' motion to make Midnight Thread Necromancy more interesting. (now 1 for, 0 against)

I claim the title of Poobah.
I declare my title of Poobah to be honorable.
I declare my title of Trademaster to be honorable.

I make a motion to allow people to retract trades. They may do so by writing: "I retract my offer to trade [offer]."
For the purposes of voting, this shall be referred to as Fiery's motion to enable retracting trades.

I make a motion to require a list of current duels as part of a State of the Nomic post, and to include only current wager instead of all of them.
For the purposes of voting, this shall be referred to as Fiery's motion to keep the SotN posts current and short.

I make a motion to introduce a property called hitpoints. These shall be equal to your score in the other game of Nomic.
For the purposes of voting, this shall be referred to as Fiery's motion to introduce hitpoints.

by **Odilo** » Sun Apr 15, 2012 2:58 am UTC

Yes, I've managed to defend my title!
Fiery, why are you allowed three motions now?

I cast my vote in favour of Kyreles' motion to make Midnight Thread Necromancy more interesting. (Now 2 for, 0 against)
I cast my vote in favour of Fiery's motion to enable retracting trades. (Now 1 for, 0 against)
I cast my vote in favour of Fiery's motion to keep the SotN posts current and short. (Now 1 for, 0 against)
I abstain from voting on Fiery's motion to introduce hitpoints. (Now 0 for, 0 against, 1 abstain)

I'll give three points to whoever casts the deciding vote on my motion.

I guess that Fiery will post next.

by **orangedragonfire** » Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:22 am UTC

Odilo wrote:Fiery, why are you allowed three motions now?

With five honorable titles, I have obtained the Leadership Perk. Which allows me one more motion (and one more bet, duel etc.)

by **orangedragonfire** » Sun Apr 15, 2012 6:44 pm UTC

(charged Ky 12 points for 2 investments)
(charged Ky 20 points for Double Down Perk)
(+6 points to Odin and -4 points to Ky for duel)
(awarded Odin 1 point for guessing correctly)

Honor: 5 points
Fiery
Odin
Carey
Froggy
Chia
Spikey

Investments:
12 Carey
10 Fiery
6 Snarky
6 Alex
6 Spikey
6 Odin
6 Patzer
6 Chia
6 Ky
4 Tim
2 Null

(awarded Fiery 2 points for State of the Nomic post)

The State of the Nomic
Rules
All Motions

Players:

Spoiler:

Chess Game:

Spoiler:

Current Wagers:

Spoiler:

Tournaments:

Spoiler:

Active Duels:

Spoiler:

Open Trades:

Spoiler:

Active motions:

Spoiler:

by **Kyreles** » Mon Apr 16, 2012 1:19 pm UTC

I cast my vote in favor of Fiery's motion to enable retracting trades. (Now 2 for, 0 against)
I cast my vote in favor of Fiery's motion to keep the SotN posts current and short. (Now 2 for, 0 against)
I cast my vote in favor of Fiery's motion to introduce hitpoints. (Now 1 for, 0 against, 1 abstain)

I'm not sure if I'm gonna be penalizied a point for this, but I wish to change my vote...

I cast my vote in favor of Odin's motion to allow only one duel for the title Duelist at a time.

I only abstained because I was one of the two people currently in a duel for the title and wasn't sure what would happen if it passed with both duels outstanding.

orangedragonfire wrote:Motion #129: Kyreles' motion to make Midnight Thread Necromancy more interesting.
Votes: 1 for (Fiery), 0 against

Odin voted in favor of this in the post right before the yours.

I suggest that Team White resign

I challenge Fiery to a duel by Sabres at Dawn to 3 points.

I wager 5 points against 5 points that I will win my duel with Fiery before noon, 4/17/12. This wager's name will be Ky's Wager #1"

by **careyhammer** » Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:29 pm UTC

I cast my vote in favor of Fiery's motion to enable retracting trades. (Now 3 for, 0 against)
I cast my vote in favor of Fiery's motion to keep the SotN posts current and short. (Now 3 for, 0 against)
I cast my vote in favor of Fiery's motion to introduce hitpoints. (Now 2 for, 0 against, 1 abstain)
I cast my vote in favor of Kyreles' motion to make Midnight Thread Necromancy more interesting. Now 3 for, 0 against

Patzer against Fiery by Mousetrap at Sunset :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombaby_the_Screen_Goddess
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_La ... t_episodes

Let the Duel Begin!

by **Odilo** » Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:11 pm UTC

Charity: Give 3 of my points to Ky.

I make a motion to introduce some new perks.
Extra Motion perk: Allows you to have one more than your maximum motions. (20 points)
Extra Duel perk: Allows you to have one more than your maximum duels. (15 points)
Extra Wager perk: Allows you to have one more than your maximum wagers. (10 points)
Extra Trade perk: Allows you to have one more than your maximum trades. (10 points)
All of the above motions are for one-time use. For example, if you are normally allowed 1 duel and you buy an extra duel, that perk disappears as soon as you are in two simultaneous duels.
For the purposes of voting, this motion shall be referred to as Odin's motion to introduce new perks.

I challenge Fiery to a duel by Ropes at Sunrise.
I challenge Carey to a duel by Sabres at Dawn to first blood.

I guess that Ky will post next.

by **Miss Fortune** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:08 pm UTC

I pick the nickname Mr X.

I have honor.

I cast my vote against Fiery's motion to introduce hitpoints. (Now 2 for, 1 against, 1 abstain)
I cast my vote in favor of Odin's motion to introduce new perks. (Now 1 for, 0 against)

I make a motion to introduce the title of "Newbie of the Nomic". The newest participant of the Nomic game will receive this title. The owner of the title may ask any question concerning the Nomic game and the next poster must answer this question truthfully.
For the purposes of voting, this motion shall be referred to as Mr X's motion to introduce the title "Newbie of the Nomic".

I guess that Fiery will post next.

by **orangedragonfire** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:14 pm UTC

Welcome to Nomic.

I cast my vote in favor of Mr X's motion to introduce the title "Newbie of the Nomic". (now 1 for, 0 against)
I cast my vote against Odin's motion to introduce new perks. (now 1 for, 1 against) I think we shouldn't have this many perks that can be bought with points (I specifically tried to make the ways of getting perks diverse) Furthermore, getting the Multiple Perks Perk shouldn't be this easy.

/edit: you also get a point for guessing correctly. Congrats!

by **Miss Fortune** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:47 pm UTC

Buy: Investment for 2 points

by **Kyreles** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:11 pm UTC

I cast my vote in favor of Mr X's motion to introduce the title "Newbie of the Nomic". (now 2 for, 0 against)
I cast my vote against Odin's motion to introduce new perks. (now 1 for, 2 against)

I move that Samurai may not refuse a duel proposed to them without forfeiting the title. For the purposes of voting, this shall be refered to as Ky's motion to make Samauri less cowardly.

Miss Fortune wrote:I have honor.

I cast my vote against Fiery's motion to introduce hitpoints. (Now 2 for, 1 against, 1 abstain)

Should be 3 for for Fiery's motion (Carey, Ky, and Mr. X) Motion passed. Fiery awarded X* points.

Arbiter, I request clarification on how Newbie Protection Perk interacts with honor. Penalities are doubled, but also a maximum of 1. So it's doubled, then reduced to 1? Or reduced to 1 then doubled?

*Also need clarification on having 3 double downs. Are they multiplicative or additive. Do you get {4, doubled to 8. 8 doubled to 16. 16 doubled to 32.} Or is it just (4x3)=12?

I guess Fiery will post next.

by **orangedragonfire** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:35 pm UTC

(penalized Ky 2 points for neglecting to write a vote summary and that Odin's motion passed)
(awarded Odin 8 points for motion passing)
(penalized Carey 3 points for neglecting to write several vote summaries and that Fiery's, Fiery's and Kyreles' motions passed)
(awarded Fiery 32 points for motion passing)
(awarded Fiery 32 points for motion passing)
(awarded Ky 8 points for motion passing)
(+3 points to Ky and -3 points to Odin due to Charity)
(awarded Mr X 1 point for guessing correctly)
(awarded Mr X 3 points for joining Nomy 1.0)
(charged Mr X 2 points for investment)
(awarded Ky 1 point for guessing correctly)
(awarded Fiery 2 points for State of the Nomic post)

The State of the Nomic
Rules
All Motions
Current amount of votes needed to decide a motion: 3

Players:

Spoiler:

Chess Game:

Spoiler:

Current Wagers:

Spoiler:

Tournaments:

Spoiler:

Active Duels:

Spoiler:

Open Trades:

Spoiler:

Active motions:
(for the full text of the motions, see the All Motions page on the wiki)

Spoiler:

by **orangedragonfire** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:46 pm UTC

I second the suggestion that Team White resign. (although we don't actually have enough White players to resign -.-)

I accept Ky's challenge, and ask Odin to be judge.
I accept Odin's challenge, and ask Ky to be judge.

Kyreles wrote:
Miss Fortune wrote:I have honor.

I cast my vote against Fiery's motion to introduce hitpoints. (Now 2 for, 1 against, 1 abstain)

Should be 3 for for Fiery's motion (Carey, Ky, and Mr. X) Motion passed. Fiery awarded X* points.

Nope, the vote was against the motion. So the vote summary was correct.

As arbiter, I declare that penalties shall first be doubled, and then reduced to 1 if a player has both honor and Newbie Protection. To reflect this clarification, rule §04.05 has been edited to include this statement: This doubling of penalties shall be applied before any other modifiers, unless otherwise stated in the rules.

As arbiter, I declare that multiple Double Down Perks are multiplicative, as that seems to be closest to the current text of the rules. To reflect this clarification, rule §04.05 has been edited to include this statement: Multiple Double Down Perks are multiplicative.

by **Kyreles** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:52 pm UTC

My motion wasn't in the State of the Nomic

by **patzer** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:56 pm UTC

I cast my vote against Fiery's motion to introduce hitpoints (Now 2 for 2 against 1 abstain)
I abstain from voting on Odin's motion to introduce new perks. (Now 1 for 2 against 1 abstain)
I cast my vote in favour of Mr X's motion to introduce the title "Newbie of the Nomic" (Now 3 for 0 against) Motion passes, Mr X awarded 4 points.
I abstain from voting on Ky's motion to make Samauri less cowardly.(Now 0 for 0 against 1 abstain)
I make a motion to introduce a maximum of 16 points available by winning a duel or having a motion passed. For the purposes of voting, this shall be referred to as Patzer's motion to stop people gaining points too quickly.
edit: just noticed ky's motion, voted on it

by **orangedragonfire** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:58 pm UTC

Kyreles wrote:My motion wasn't in the State of the Nomic

True. This has been fixed.

I cast my vote in favor of Ky's motion to make Samauri less cowardly. (now 1 for, 0 against, 1 abstain)

I guess that Ky will post next.

by **patzer** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:15 pm UTC

I'll use my extra vote
I cast my vote against Fiery's motion to introduce hitpoints (Now 2 for 3 against 1 abstain) Motion fails, Fiery penalized 16 points

by **orangedragonfire** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:50 pm UTC

I cast my vote against Patzer's motion to stop people gaining points too quickly. (now 0 for, 1 against) Using Double Downs to gain more points from motions also makes the penalty from getting a motion rejected larger, so it balances out. As for duels, there is no way to get 16 points or more anyway.
For instance, with honor and 3 Double Down bonuses, I'd get only 16 points for motions accepted while loosing 32 for those rejected if this motion get accepted.

I make a motion to amend section 1 of rule §06.02 to the following:
Anyone may challenge another person to a duel by saying "I, [nickname + titles of challenger], challenge [nickname + titles of challengee] to a duel by [method]." where "method" is one of the prescribed methods of duelling (see below). Example: "I, Tim, Samurai and Honorable Poobah, challenge Tom, Newbie of the Nomic, to a duel by Ropes at Sunrise."
For the purposes of voting, this motion shall be referred to as Fiery's motion to make duels more formal.

I make a motion add the following rule:
People are allowed to continue any duel, wager, motion, bet or other official action they have started without penalties, even if they loose the means through which they were first allowed to start them, unless otherwise stated in the rules.
For the purposes of voting, this motion shall be referred to as Fiery's motion to let people finish what they started.
(for instance, loosing the duelist title when you are in three duels)

I make a motion to introduce an order for modifiers to points. When someone gains or looses points, the modifiers shall be applied in this order if they apply. When someone makes a motion introducing a new modifiers, it has to include the position in this order. The starting order is proposed as follows:
1 Honor
2 Double Down
3 Samurai status
4 Duel for Duelist
5 Newbie Protection
6 Protection
For the purposes of voting, this motion shall be referred to as Fiery's motion to clarify points modifiers.

by **Kyreles** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 5:37 pm UTC

I cast my vote against Patzer's motion to stop people gaining points too quickly. (now 0 for, 2 against) I agree with Fiery. The risk is higher so the reward being higher is okay.

I have a question about Fiery's motion to make duels more formal.

orangedragonfire wrote:I make a motion to amend section 1 of rule §06.02 to the following:
Anyone may challenge another person to a duel by saying ...

Emphasis mine. Does this mean that proposing the duel is optional or the wording is optional. It seems that the wording is ment to replace the existing one. If so, then, I cast my vote against Fiery's motion to make duels more formal.

I cast my vote in favor of Fiery's motion to let people finish what they started.
I cast my vote in favor of Fiery's motion to clarify points modifiers.

by **patzer** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:11 pm UTC

I withdraw my motion to stop people gaining points too quickly.
I abstain from voting on Fiery's motion to let people finish what they started. 1 for 1 abstain 0 against
I abstain from voting on Fiery's motion to clarify points modifiers. 1 for 1 abstain 0 against
I make a motion to reduce the number of people needed to resign the chess game to 2. For the purposes of voting, this shall be referred to as Patzer's motion to enable the game of chess to be finished.

by **Snark** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:17 pm UTC

I second the suggestion that Team White resign.

or

I third the suggestion that Team White resign.

Pick one.

by **orangedragonfire** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:17 pm UTC

Kyreles wrote:I have a question about Fiery's motion to make duels more formal.
orangedragonfire wrote:I make a motion to amend section 1 of rule §06.02 to the following:
Anyone may challenge another person to a duel by saying ...

Emphasis mine. Does this mean that proposing the duel is optional or the wording is optional. It seems that the wording is ment to replace the existing one. If so, then, I cast my vote against Fiery's motion to make duels more formal.

The "may" is part of the current rule, I didn't change that. But it is a good points, so:

I change my motion to make duels more formal in the following way: Instead of "Anyone may challenge another person to a duel by saying..." it shall say "Anyone may challenge another person to a duel. This is done by saying..." The complete revised motion now is as follows:

I make a motion to amend section 1 of rule §06.02 to the following:
Anyone may challenge another person to a duel by saying "I, [nickname + titles of challenger], challenge [nickname + titles of challengee] to a duel by [method]." where "method" is one of the prescribed methods of duelling (see below). Example: "I, Tim, Samurai and Honorable Poobah, challenge Tom, Newbie of the Nomic, to a duel by Ropes at Sunrise."
For the purposes of voting, this motion shall be referred to as Fiery's motion to make duels more formal.

by **Kyreles** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:02 pm UTC

Not sure if that is "purely grammatical" per rule §02.08 so to be safe I'm gonna vote again.

I cast my vote against Fiery's motion to make duels more formal.

by **Odilo** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:39 pm UTC

I cast my vote in favour of Ky's motion to make Samauri less cowardly. (Now 2 for, 0 against, 1 abstain)
I abstain from voting on Fiery's motion to make duels more formal. (0 for, 1 against, 1 abstain)
I cast my vote in favour of Fiery's motion to let people finish what they started. (Now 2 for, 0 against, 1 abstain)
I cast my vote in favour of Fiery's motion to clarify points modifiers. (Now 2 for, 0 against, 1 abstain)
I cast my vote in favour of Patzer's motion to enable the game of chess to be finished. (Now 1 for, 0 against)

I agree to judge the duel between Ky and Fiery. The duel has begun!

I guess that Fiery will post next.

by **patzer** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:07 pm UTC

I have just received 15 points for winning at chess. which means I can afford...

I have honor
I buy: Remove Fiery's Grand High Poobah of the Nomic title for 25 points
I buy: Grand High Poobah of the Nomic for 35 points
because. 1) Fiery would be able to win after his motions pass,
and 2) because I want to have been the Grand High Poobah at some point, even for a short period of time.

by **patzer** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:22 pm UTC

I withdraw my motion to enable the game of chess to be finished. as its already over.
I abstain from voting on Fiery's motion to make duels more formal (0 for, 1 against, 2 abstain)
I make a motion to make an absolute maximum of 2 double down perks. Specifically the relevant part of Rule 5.01 would say "Double Down perk - every motion of yours that passes/fails is worth double the normal amount (which is currently +4/-2). Multiple Double Down Perks are multiplicative. No single player may have two or more copies of the Double Down perk at once unless otherwise stated in the rules. No single player may ever have three or more copies of the Double Down perk. They may buy it, somehow lose it, and repurchase it." For the purposes of voting, this shall be referred to as Patzer's motion to prevent rapid point gain. Because currently with 32 points for every motion passing it's easy to quickly get to 250 points.

Wait.... just noticed its 500 not 250... oops... sorry fiery I was trying to keep the game going didnt notice the rule change.

I make a motion to establish a game of team chess. Any player may join the game as part of Team Black or Team White at any time by posting in bold italics "I join team [Black / White]." Once a member of one team, a player may not switch teams. A player can make a move for their team by posting to the forum in bold italics using standard chess move notation. No player can post two consecutive moves for their team. A player is awarded 1 point for capturing a pawn, 3 for capturing a bishop or knight, 5 for a rook, and 8 for a queen. The player who makes the winning checkmate move is awarded 15 points and every other winning team member is awarded 10 points. For the purposes of voting, this shall be referred to as Patzer's motion to create a new chess game.

by **orangedragonfire** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:52 pm UTC

(awarded Mr X 4 points for Motion passing)
(penalized Fiery 29 points for motion failing)
(penalized Patzer 2 points for writing that Fiery is penalized 16 points instead of 29)
(penalized Ky 2 points for neglecting to write vote summaries)
(penalized Patzer 2 points for not voting on all motions before making a new one (missing was Fiery's motion to make duels more formal))
(awarded Patzer 15 points for winning chess)
(awarded Carey 10 points for winning chess)
(awarded Alex 10 points for winning chess)
(awarded Odin 10 points for winning chess)
(awarded matt96 10 points for winning chess)
(charged Patzer a total of 60 points for removing and then buying the title of Grand High Poobah of the Nomic)
(awarded Fiery 2 points for State of the Nomic post)

The State of the Nomic
Rules
All Motions
Current amount of votes needed to decide a motion: 3

Players:

Spoiler:

Current Wagers:

Spoiler:

Tournaments:

Spoiler:

Active Duels:

Spoiler:

Open Trades:

Spoiler:

Active motions:
(for the full text of the motions, see the All Motions page on the wiki)

Spoiler:

by **Kyreles** » Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:31 pm UTC

Buy: Double Down perk for 20 points

I cast my vote against Patzer's motion to prevent rapid point gain. (now 0 for, 1 against)
I cast my vote in favor of Patzer's motion to create a new chess game. (now 1 for, 0 against)

I wager 3 points against 5 points that the next comic posted after this wager is accepted will contain someone in a hat. This wager will be Ky's wager #1.

I have made my first move in our duel, Fiery. I picked paper. Please pick rock, not scissors.

Also, I have a problem with the State of the Nomic:

Open Trades:

By Fiery:
I offer to trade my title of Trademaster for 40 points.
I offer to trade 25 points for the title of Grand High Poobah of the Nomic.
I offer to trade 10 points for the title of Bookkeeper.
I offer to trade 10 points for an Extra Vote Perk.
I offer to trade 15 points for the title of Duelist.

You don't own the title of Grand High Poobah of the Nomic. You don't own the title of Duelist. You don't own the title of Bookkeeper. At least according to the State of the Nomic. This means you only have 2 valid trades: Extra vote and Trademaster. And I'm not entirely sure you have an extra vote. If so then you only have one valid trade. And the rules say Trademaster must have 3, right? So... clarification?

I guess that Fiery will post next

by **Odilo** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:12 am UTC

Ky strikes, Fiery parries. Fiery scores a hit!

by **orangedragonfire** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:59 pm UTC

Kyreles wrote:You don't own the title of Grand High Poobah of the Nomic. You don't own the title of Duelist. You don't own the title of Bookkeeper. At least according to the State of the Nomic. This means you only have 2 valid trades: Extra vote and Trademaster. And I'm not entirely sure you have an extra vote. If so then you only have one valid trade. And the rules say Trademaster must have 3, right? So... clarification?

That's easy. The first part of the trades are what I am offering, the second what I want. I don't need to have the things I want, just the ones I'm offering.

by **Odilo** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:55 pm UTC

Ky strikes, Fiery strikes. No one scores a hit.

by **careyhammer** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 8:17 pm UTC

I cast my vote in favor of Odin's motion to introduce new perks.
Now 2 for (Mr X, Carey), 2 against (Fiery, Ky), 1 abstain (Patzer)

I cast my vote in favor of Ky's motion to make Samauri less cowardly.
Now 3 for (Fiery, Odin, Carey), 0 against, 1 abstain (Patzer) Motion passes Ky awarded points.

I cast my vote in favor of Fiery's motion to make duels more formal.
Now 1 for (Carey), 1 against (Ky), 1 abstain (Patzer, Odin)

I cast my vote in favor of Fiery's motion to let people finish what they started.
Now 3 for (Ky, Odin, Carey), 0 against, 1 abstain (Patzer) Motion passes Fiery awarded points.

I cast my vote in favor of Fiery's motion to clarify points modifiers
Now 3 for (Ky, Odin, Carey), 0 against, 1 abstain (Patzer) Motiion passes Fiery awarded points.

I cast my vote against Patzer's motion to prevent rapid point gain.
Now 0 for, 0 against (Carey)

I cast my vote in favor of Patzer's motion to create a new chess game
Votes: 1 for (Carey), 0 against

I accept Odin's challenge against Carey by Sabres at Dawn to first blood and ask Feiry to be judge.

I guess that Feiry will post next.

by **orangedragonfire** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 9:41 pm UTC

I cast my vote in favor of Patzer's motion to create a new chessgame. (now 2 for, 0 against)
I cast my vote against Patzer's motion to prevent rapid point gain. (now 0 for, 3 against) Motion failed. Patzer penalized 3 points.

(awarded Ky 8 points for motion passing)
(awarded Fiery 32 points for motion passing)
(awarded Fiery 32 points for motion passing)
(penalized Carey 3 points for wrong vote count and missing points people got from motions)
(awarded Carey 1 point for guessing correctly)
(penalized Patzer 3 points, returned Patzer to 0 points)
(awarded Fiery 2 points for State of the Nomic post)

The State of the Nomic
Rules
All Motions
Current amount of votes needed to decide a motion: 3

Players:

Spoiler:

Current Wagers:

Spoiler:

Tournaments:

Spoiler:

Active Duels:

Spoiler:

Open Trades:

Spoiler:

Active motions:
(for the full text of the motions, see the All Motions page on the wiki)

Spoiler:

by **careyhammer** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 10:17 pm UTC

I cast my vote in favor of Fiery's motion to make duels more formal.
Now 2 for (Fiery, Carey), 1 against (Ky), 2 abstain (Patzer, Odin)

I accept Ky's wager #1

by **orangedragonfire** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 10:21 pm UTC

Sorry, I messed that up. You already voted for that motion; the vote for was yours and not mine. The SotN post has been edited to correct this grievous error.

Although I guess it is a good idea for me to my motion if I can...

I cast my vote in favor of Fiery's motion to make duels more formal. (now 2 for, 1 against, 2 abstain)

/edit: also, I accept to be judge. Let the duel start now!

by **careyhammer** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 10:27 pm UTC

Whats up with the tournament? Has anyone seen Froggy?

by **orangedragonfire** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 10:30 pm UTC

About that:

I make a motion to declare the current tournament a failure and remove it from the SotN post, since the organizer isn't active anymore. For the purposes of voting, this motion shall be referred to as Fiery's motion to get reduce the waste of space in the SotN.

by **careyhammer** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 10:38 pm UTC

I cast my vote in favor of Fiery's motion to get reduce the waste of space in the SotN. Now 1 for, 0 against

by **Odilo** » Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:50 am UTC

Ky strikes, Fiery parries. Fiery scores a hit! (0 points Ky, 2 points Fiery)

by **orangedragonfire** » Fri Apr 20, 2012 4:15 pm UTC

I cast my vote in favor of Fiery's motion to get reduce the waste of space in the SotN. Now 2 for, 0 against

Who is online