xkcd

by **matt96** » Wed Apr 18, 2012 9:15 pm UTC

something funny, witty, and creative.

by **Sruixan** » Wed Apr 18, 2012 9:20 pm UTC

preferable

by **matt96** » Wed Apr 18, 2012 9:31 pm UTC

Sruixan wrote:preferable

Preferable in comparison to what?

by **Sruixan** » Wed Apr 18, 2012 9:49 pm UTC

election

by **matt96** » Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:01 pm UTC

random words?

by **Sruixan** » Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:11 pm UTC

zunehmend

by **matt96** » Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:17 pm UTC

by **Sruixan** » Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:18 pm UTC

erwartet

by **Phrozt** » Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:20 pm UTC

hfxtxjxkfk

by **matt96** » Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:43 pm UTC

zawexdcru? o;uilkytdresrdf!

by **Phrozt** » Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:51 pm UTC

mft7iyf...

by **matt96** » Wed Apr 18, 2012 11:24 pm UTC

ainverwun akwub urwv wjvrwe biv23uvkeuo!!!!!

by **Phrozt** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:23 am UTC

jfdkkfilvvvv;;v;v

by **matt96** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:46 am UTC

Quote?
Quote!
Quote??
Quote!!!!

Quote???????

by **Phrozt** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 2:59 am UTC

hjfjfdk

by **matt96** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 3:06 am UTC

To tired to post reasonable things, hooray for iPod auto correct.

by **Phrozt** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 3:43 am UTC

tygubhkjlm

by **matt96** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:04 am UTC

Ejdhwuausiwjsbysksbxhsksj

by **Phrozt** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 1:54 pm UTC

dsgshjsj

by **matt96** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 2:12 pm UTC

something

by **Sruixan** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 3:37 pm UTC

popsicles

by **Phrozt** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:00 pm UTC

grsdhjsj

by **matt96** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:31 pm UTC

mkh vvyubhj

by **Sruixan** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:54 pm UTC

reassurance

by **matt96** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:59 pm UTC

better than random characters is random words

by **Sruixan** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:02 pm UTC

voracious

by **matt96** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:08 pm UTC

raptors?

by **Sruixan** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:18 pm UTC

endings

by **matt96** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:22 pm UTC

beginings

by **Sruixan** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:24 pm UTC

unerring

by **matt96** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:32 pm UTC

always right?

by **Sruixan** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:35 pm UTC

glossary

by **matt96** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:51 pm UTC

terms

by **orangedragonfire** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:54 pm UTC

matt96 wrote:
orangedragonfire wrote:a forum game being played within a forum game, how fun would that be

Very fun indeed. See Nomic 16.0; we are playing currently over 10 different games as part of Nomic. One of them being Nomic.

(I am counting the different duelling methods as different games)

by **matt96** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:02 pm UTC

nice, but can we do that in here too?

by **orangedragonfire** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:16 pm UTC

Play Nomic here? Sure.

These are the starting rules:

§001:
Any player may set forth a motion to take some official action. Official actions include, but are not limited to, amendment of or additions of rules.

§002:
All official motions must be in bold and italics and begin with "I make a motion to..." Additionally, official motions must end with "For the purposes of voting, this motion shall be referred to as [username]'s motion to...", followed by a summary of the motion's actions, with "[username]" replaced by the motion-maker's username. For example, one could say "I make a motion to promote ahammel to the cerimonial position of Grand High Poobah of the Nomic. For the purposes of voting, this motion shall be referred to as ahammel's motion to grant himself a meaningless title."

§003:
To vote in favor of or against a motion, one must declare one's vote by saying "I cast my vote [in favor of/against] [motion-maker]'s motion to [motion summary]." For example, one could say "I cast my vote in favor of ahammel's motion to grant himself a meaningless title.".

§004:
If at any point there are three votes from three different players in favor of a motion, the motion passes and is acted upon. If at any point there are three votes from three different players against a motion, the motion fails. If the motion passes, and requires that the rules be amended, the motion-maker must do this as soon as possible, and post the revised ruleset. If the motion-maker fails to do this within 48 hours of the motion's passage, the motion's state is changed, and it fails.

by **matt96** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:21 pm UTC

I make a motion to turn this thread into a game of nomic. for the purposes of voting, this motion shall be referred to as matt96's motion to double the number of games being played in this thread.

by **careyhammer** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:58 pm UTC

I cast my vote in favor of matt96's motion to double the number of games being played in this thread.

by **matt96** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:59 pm UTC

careyhammer wrote:I cast my vote in favor of matt96's motion to double the number of games being played in this thread.

thanks!

by **careyhammer** » Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:04 pm UTC

Who is online