xkcd

by **orangedragonfire** » Fri Apr 20, 2012 12:41 am UTC

Then i decrypt your secret and post it on the net.

by **matt96** » Fri Apr 20, 2012 12:43 am UTC

but your decryption failed horribly.

by **t1mm01994** » Fri Apr 20, 2012 11:04 am UTC

OBJECTION!

by **orangedragonfire** » Fri Apr 20, 2012 11:47 am UTC

I hide my secret in a manner so secret that I can't even write it here.

by **t1mm01994** » Fri Apr 20, 2012 12:28 pm UTC

Opened this thread,so another useless post it is.

by **orangedragonfire** » Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:18 pm UTC

This too is a secret.

by **matt96** » Fri Apr 20, 2012 4:56 pm UTC

orangedragonfire wrote:This too is a secret.

not a secret one.

by **t1mm01994** » Fri Apr 20, 2012 5:42 pm UTC

I can at least contradict the rumour that viewing multiple pages leads to multiple threadviews. Tried it on the minimize thread and it failed.

by **matt96** » Fri Apr 20, 2012 5:55 pm UTC

orangedragonfire wrote:This too is a secret.

Definitely not anymore

by **t1mm01994** » Fri Apr 20, 2012 6:15 pm UTC

OH SNAP HE WENT THERE

by **matt96** » Fri Apr 20, 2012 9:17 pm UTC

I DID?

by **el_cheato** » Sat Apr 21, 2012 9:49 pm UTC

Sperm whales are not named so for their white color, but because when the first whalers caught one, they drilled into it's skull to extract the precious whale oil, only to find a white waxy substance instead. It was originally thought to be the whale's sperm, but that has since been disproven. It is not known what the biological function of the white waxy substance, now called spermaceti, is, but it is used in many cosmetics due to it's bright gleam and lack of any taste or odor.

by **matt96** » Sun Apr 22, 2012 2:56 am UTC

el_cheato wrote:Sperm whales are not named so for their white color, but because when the first whalers caught one, they drilled into it's skull to extract the precious whale oil, only to find a white waxy substance instead. It was originally thought to be the whale's sperm, but that has since been disproven. It is not known what the biological function of the white waxy substance, now called spermaceti, is, but it is used in many cosmetics due to it's bright gleam and lack of any taste or odor.

Anyone want to put this in the today I learned thread?

by **pne** » Tue Apr 24, 2012 11:18 am UTC

One theory I've heard is that it controls the sperm whale's buoyancy.

by **orangedragonfire** » Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:57 pm UTC

I don't know what to write, but I looked so I have too...

by **Bartimaeus** » Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:29 pm UTC

bloop bloop bloop

by **peri_renna** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 6:03 pm UTC

t1mm01994 wrote:I can at least contradict the rumour that viewing multiple pages leads to multiple threadviews. Tried it on the minimize thread and it failed.

Thanks!

by **matt96** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 6:22 pm UTC

great, now I looked and I feel obliged to post

by **farnsworth** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:36 pm UTC

Similarly obliged to post.

by **matt96** » Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:41 pm UTC

please don't look at this post, it is a trap to get you to have a need to post too.

by **peri_renna** » Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:26 am UTC

matt96 wrote:please don't look at this post, it is a trap to get you to have a need to post too.

Why'd you post it, then?

by **Роберт** » Fri May 04, 2012 6:56 pm UTC

Posting without actually looking. But I'm sure it counted as a view anyway.

by **halgdp** » Fri May 04, 2012 8:21 pm UTC

testing

by **orangedragonfire** » Fri May 04, 2012 9:47 pm UTC

Note the absence of meaning in this post.

by **SFX** » Sun May 06, 2012 2:20 am UTC

Damn it, I looked, so I must post.

by **orangedragonfire** » Sun May 06, 2012 2:21 am UTC

SFX wrote:Damn it, I looked, so I must post.

yeeeeeesssssssss.... my plan worked perfectly....

by **Sargon of Akkad** » Sun May 06, 2012 6:17 pm UTC

No! its a trap! Now you must post.

by **orangedragonfire** » Thu May 10, 2012 6:28 am UTC

How did I fall for that?

by **[username]** » Thu May 10, 2012 3:15 pm UTC

Posted without looking.

by **[username]** » Thu May 10, 2012 3:15 pm UTC

And again.

by **[username]** » Thu May 10, 2012 3:16 pm UTC

Sucks how low the ratio is already, though. Posting three times without looking isn't really going to do heaps...

by **mind404** » Fri May 11, 2012 5:11 pm UTC

i do find it funny that 'count to a million' has a higher actual view/post ratio

by **Cathy** » Tue May 15, 2012 2:46 am UTC

made ya look!

by **Cathy** » Tue May 15, 2012 2:46 am UTC

Also, my browser has this nasty habit of sending me back to the page after I post... this might have an effect on the post:view ratio.

by **ShortChelsea** » Tue May 29, 2012 4:48 pm UTC

Crap, I thought this was the maximize the views:post ratio one. ...poopie.

by **eculc** » Tue May 29, 2012 4:49 pm UTC

t1mm01994 wrote:OBJECTION!

OVERRULED!

by **orangedragonfire** » Thu Jun 07, 2012 3:01 pm UTC

and another post bites the dust

by **Adam H** » Thu Jun 07, 2012 6:17 pm UTC

One of the great tragedies of the world is that this thread does not have 111,270 posts.

by **mieulium** » Fri Jun 08, 2012 9:56 am UTC

... And that it has people constantly reminding us that this thread is not reaching expectations. .. FUCK YOU DAD. I DONT HAVE TO MEET YOUR EXPECTATIONS!

by **Adam H** » Fri Jun 08, 2012 3:36 pm UTC

Clicked on the thread to see the response to my previous post, realized it meant I had to post. (first-world-problem) :cry:

Who is online