Moderators: SecondTalon, Moderators General, Prelates
Laserdan wrote:I did like the series, but I have to say the pacing felt wrong to me. Somehow it felt to me as if they breezed through the storyline, everything a bit to quick for my taste (though I understand that this is probably necessary due to production cost and attention span of people accustomed to this format).
The only thing that really rubbed me the wrong way was Littlefinger's speech to the two fun-having ladies in the whorehouse. It seemed arbitrary and out-of-place. Like the well-known "as you know, we are planning to..." where people talk about things that they know but spell it out for the viewers. I regard that as lazy writing.
Obby wrote:Laserdan wrote:I did like the series, but I have to say the pacing felt wrong to me. Somehow it felt to me as if they breezed through the storyline, everything a bit to quick for my taste (though I understand that this is probably necessary due to production cost and attention span of people accustomed to this format).
The only thing that really rubbed me the wrong way was Littlefinger's speech to the two fun-having ladies in the whorehouse. It seemed arbitrary and out-of-place. Like the well-known "as you know, we are planning to..." where people talk about things that they know but spell it out for the viewers. I regard that as lazy writing.
I attribute this more to the changes necessary in adapting works to different mediums, rather than ineptitude. They have to divide an 800 page book into 10 episodes. That's a lot of cramming for any book, let alone one with as complex a plot as ASoIaF. Some things are going to get cut, some things are going to get truncated, some things are going to not make sense due to the cuts, some things are going to get changed to make these other things make sense, etc. It's a very difficult process. Fans of this series are fortunate in that at least GRRM has input into the show. A lot of book adaptations are not that lucky.
maybeagnostic wrote:Edited.
I assumed spoilers are used for book stuff. Are we also putting spoilers for events from the show at this point?
It never bothers me while watching an episode but I get the same feeling a few days later. I can't quite figure out why though. The transitions are sudden but very well executed. I sometimes feel like they are just going through a checklist of every single scene from the books and ticking them off one by one but... even if that is the case, it isn't actually bad. I think it is all the small things- the stuff they don't have the time to fully present but still make allusions to. Someone who's read the books can get a lot more information from all sorts of small gestures and 'throwaway' lines that other viewers would ignore but that makes almost every single scene packed with information.Laserdan wrote:I did like the series, but I have to say the pacing felt wrong to me. Somehow it felt to me as if they breezed through the story line
The other thing was a single scene that I found not fitting, and additionally it is a well-known cliche to tell the viewer something in this way, and that is why I found that single scene to be bad writing. That thing has actually an entry on TVTropes called "As You Know", and it was a huge infodump. They could've done it with more subtlety than Littlefinger monologueing to two prostitutes having lesbian sex while he gives them instructions interspersingly.
Yakk wrote:Random: the Maid of Tarth isn't ugly enough.
(I don't consider that a spoiler: if you know what I'm saying, it isn't news...)
Intrigued wrote:which has led me to ask, book to future episodes spoilersSpoiler:
maybeagnostic wrote:I assumed spoilers are used for book stuff. Are we also putting spoilers for events from the show at this point?
LaserGuy wrote: The scene with Littlefinger and Ross in the brothel in the previous episode... not so much. A lot of the scenes with Littlefinger and Ross, separately or together, are often the ones that I'd wish they'd leave out, now that I think about it.
Yakk wrote:Not-a-spoiler:Spoiler:
Yeah, which I think is a symptom of the unfortunate fact that audiences aren't expected to be able to sympathize with truly unattractive female characters. Though as mentioned, her reputation as ugly might have more to do with thwarting people's expectations of noblewomen than with her actually being hard on the eyes.Yakk wrote:Random: the Maid of Tarth isn't ugly enough.
And while you're at it, if you haven't read all the books and seen all the episodes up through the most recent, don't open the thread.Intrigued wrote:How are they worse than useless? It still covers the text, if you don't know what a spoiler is going to spoil, and there are things you haven't read or seen, don't open it.Yakk wrote:A spoiler that isn't marked up with what it could spoil is worse than useless.
Because this is a thread for the Show, not the book. If you want to leave your book spoilers without descriptions, go post them in the book thread. I think generally its okay to put show spoilers here without descriptions. That's the line.Intrigued wrote: Don't get me wrong, I appreciate what the descriptions before spoiler tags do, but if there's no description, opening the spoiler is swim at your own risk.
Yakk wrote:The question the thought experiment I posted is aimed at answering: When falling in a black hole, do you see the entire universe's future history train-car into your ass, or not?
gmalivuk wrote:Regarding Tyrion on a similar note:Spoiler:
SexyTalon wrote:*swoons* I love you, all powerful pseudoidiot!
ShootTheChicken wrote:I can't stop thinking about pseudoidiot's penis.
Agreed. The ironborn fell a bit flat for me in the books but I am enjoying their scenes in the show a lot more than I expected.LaserGuy wrote:Although I never really warmed to it in the books, this is rapidly becoming one of my favourite storylines in the TV series. Balon Greyjoy is just awesome, and Theon's homecoming (and subsequently being knocked down a couple of pegs) has been handled brilliantly.
Belial wrote:That's charming, Nancy, but all I hear when you talk is a bunch of yippy dog sounds.
Diadem wrote: I'd say they did a pretty good job in making her less attractive.
sourmilk wrote:Well, I'm still technically correct. The best kind of correct.
/shrug -- she doesn't look at all ugly. And the books go on and on about how the Maid of Tarth is ugly. Maybe that is just her self esteem talking.Diadem wrote:I'd say they did a pretty good job in making her less attractive.
I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you, I'm just saying I've seen kids that I couldn't tell if they were boys or girls, and this isn't one of them. The real problem I have is that it's a 15 year-old actress trying to pass off as a young boy, and they put liberal amounts of makeup on her which doesn't help.Lucrece wrote:Also, Arya, too "pretty" to be taken for a boy? First of all, thick ass, bushy eyebrows and a equally thick rounded nose are not exactly what people associate with "pretty" and "feminine", and there are many boys that are slow to start masculinizing body-wise. At that age it can be tricky to distinguish boys from girls if you remove the hairstyling, clothing, and socially ingrained body language.
I would recommend anyone who hasn't watched or read the series to read the books first. That said, the books might ruin the show for you. I don't actually think the show is all that great, and I'm pretty sure my irrational love of the books is to blame.Ixtellor wrote:Being that this is probably my favorite TV show, should I now go read the books? Or would that ruin the enjoyment and surprise of the series.
Users browsing this forum: Slageammalymn and 1 guest