Moderators: Moderators General, Magistrates, Prelates
Hofstadter'sLaw wrote:If he’s really that busy I don’t want to bother him though.
Thank you for pointing out what should have been obvious. I feel better now. =]
Amie wrote:Cathy, I now declare you to be an awesome person, by the powers vested in me by nobody, really.
yurell wrote:We need fewer homoeopaths, that way they'll be more potent!
Hofstadter'sLaw wrote:It’s actually only the forth or fifth week of the term at the school I went to, but it’s a good point that he probably deals with an inbox full of e-mails every day since he teaches a couple of classes. I guess mine got pushed to the next page and forgotten. If he’s really that busy I don’t want to bother him though.
Thank you for pointing out what should have been obvious. I feel better now. =]
emceng wrote:You're freaking kidding me. A few weeks ago I signed up for a free seminar that occurs today. I got put on the waitlist. This morning, 9 minutes before the event starts, I got a registration email saying I am registered for the course. Thanks! That was really helpful. I'm sure that it would be useful for me seeing the email 20 minutes after the course starts, and that 30 min(ignoring traffic) drive to the location? Sure, that won't be a problem either.
firechicago wrote:As part of my job I screen the email of a professor at a large research university, and I can promise you that a lot of important emails go unanswered just because it's just more than one person (or even two people!) can handle.
Just today I saw an email to the effect of "Weren't we talking 6 months ago about doing a joint project with [large international organization working in our field]? I totally forgot about following up on that."
firechicago wrote:As part of my job I screen the email of a professor at a large research university, and I can promise you that a lot of important emails go unanswered just because it's just more than one person (or even two people!) can handle.
Just today I saw an email to the effect of "Weren't we talking 6 months ago about doing a joint project with [large international organization working in our field]? I totally forgot about following up on that."
Enokh wrote:It was only fairly recently that I discovered the full ramifications of society's apparent belief of "Well of COURSE the mother should be the one to get the child!".
Amie wrote:Cathy, I now declare you to be an awesome person, by the powers vested in me by nobody, really.
yurell wrote:We need fewer homoeopaths, that way they'll be more potent!
Cathy wrote:I'm sorry. I plan to have kids in the next 10 year somewhere here, and what's currently scaring the hell out of me and making me really angry is the assumption that if my son gets pregnant with someone else's daughter, I [and he] get off scot free but if my daughter gets pregnant with someone else's son, she and the kid are 100% guaranteed to be with me for 20 years and the boy 100% will be a deadbeat with no interest in his child.
Menacing Spike wrote:Cathy wrote:I'm sorry. I plan to have kids in the next 10 year somewhere here, and what's currently scaring the hell out of me and making me really angry is the assumption that if my son gets pregnant with someone else's daughter, I [and he] get off scot free but if my daughter gets pregnant with someone else's son, she and the kid are 100% guaranteed to be with me for 20 years and the boy 100% will be a deadbeat with no interest in his child.
Er, what about abortions?
Location wrote:TX, USA
Zarq wrote:Menacing Spike wrote:Cathy wrote:I'm sorry. I plan to have kids in the next 10 year somewhere here, and what's currently scaring the hell out of me and making me really angry is the assumption that if my son gets pregnant with someone else's daughter, I [and he] get off scot free but if my daughter gets pregnant with someone else's son, she and the kid are 100% guaranteed to be with me for 20 years and the boy 100% will be a deadbeat with no interest in his child.
Er, what about abortions?Location wrote:TX, USA
Amie wrote:Cathy, I now declare you to be an awesome person, by the powers vested in me by nobody, really.
yurell wrote:We need fewer homoeopaths, that way they'll be more potent!
Zarq wrote:I wasn't assuming you were anti-abortion, I just thought it was illegal.
Amie wrote:Cathy, I now declare you to be an awesome person, by the powers vested in me by nobody, really.
yurell wrote:We need fewer homoeopaths, that way they'll be more potent!
Amie wrote:Cathy, I now declare you to be an awesome person, by the powers vested in me by nobody, really.
yurell wrote:We need fewer homoeopaths, that way they'll be more potent!
Cathy wrote:Enokh wrote:It was only fairly recently that I discovered the full ramifications of society's apparent belief of "Well of COURSE the mother should be the one to get the child!".
I'm sorry. I plan to have kids in the next 10 year somewhere here, and what's currently scaring the hell out of me and making me really angry is the assumption that if my son gets pregnant with someone else's daughter, I [and he] get off scot free but if my daughter gets pregnant with someone else's son, she and the kid are 100% guaranteed to be with me for 20 years and the boy 100% will be a deadbeat with no interest in his child.
WTF.
Steax wrote:The issue is so bad that I'm developing my own platform for client collaboration.
Kithplana wrote:Dear ISP,
When I, at 1.1.1.1, am trying to get to 2.2.2.2 and am reaching 3.3.3.3 (ISP's router) before hitting 10.x.x.x (yes, actually a 10.x address), and cannot get to 2.2.2.2, please don't tell me to try a different device from 1.1.1.1, or even imply that this is the fault of anything at 1.1.1.1 at all. That's like me telling you there's a big sinkhole in the road I can't walk past and you telling me to try different shoes.
Please just fix it. Having my traceroute over the public Internet deadend somewhere in your network at a 10.x address gives me the heebie-jeebies.
This. The neighbors across the street have this dog that yaps in an almost metronomic "arf arf arf arf arf arf arf..." for minutes on end. -___-Giant Speck wrote:I absolutely HATE the sound of a high-pitched dog yap. One of my neighbors' isn't at home and their dog is barking and scratching at the door. I can hear it through my walls.
ExplodingHat wrote:This. The neighbors across the street have this dog that yaps in an almost metronomic "arf arf arf arf arf arf arf..." for minutes on end. -___-Giant Speck wrote:I absolutely HATE the sound of a high-pitched dog yap. One of my neighbors' isn't at home and their dog is barking and scratching at the door. I can hear it through my walls.
Promicin wrote:Now if I can just grab on with my tongue-like foot... wait. I am not a mussel.
pseudoidiot wrote:Someone should sig thisYou, sir, name? wrote:fucking owls is enjoyable.
Giant Speck wrote:I absolutely HATE the sound of a high-pitched dog yap. One of my neighbors' isn't at home and their dog is barking and scratching at the door. I can hear it through my walls.
Indeed. I have no idea what my dogs do all day. Case in point, though, of when I had a roommate/tenant/housemate/whatever... He'd get home before me, walk in, say hi to my dog in a crate who wouldn't make a sound, maybe look at him, maybe not, and my roommate would go about his business in the (essentially) silent house. Dog hears my or my wife's car pull in, and starts going nuts because he's SO HAPPY one of us is home.Zarq wrote:Giant Speck wrote:I absolutely HATE the sound of a high-pitched dog yap. One of my neighbors' isn't at home and their dog is barking and scratching at the door. I can hear it through my walls.
Have you told him yet? There's a good chance he doesn't know. A lot of dogs shut up when they hear their owners returning, and neighbors sometimes don't dare to say it.
Weeks wrote:A tame dragon is its own reward.TaintedDeity wrote:And all I get is this tame space dragon. Where's my recognition?!
[.root/fail] wrote:Only a loser would sig themselves...
General_Norris wrote:I notice a lack of counter-arguments and a lot of fisting.
Gears wrote:Airlines are stupid fuck! If I book a flight to go the US, and return on a certain date, I need that return date to be the day in Japan, not the US!! Fuck!! Wasted money now I have to change it because they didn't account for the date line.
sourmilk wrote:Well, I'm still technically correct. The best kind of correct.
Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at boards.4chan.org.
Hofstadter'sLaw wrote:I hate how relatives drop by out of the blue without calling first. Especially if it means entertaining them for the next two hours, when I had other things I needed to do and when I look like crap because I didn't expect to have to deal with people today.
Amie wrote:Cathy, I now declare you to be an awesome person, by the powers vested in me by nobody, really.
yurell wrote:We need fewer homoeopaths, that way they'll be more potent!
Users browsing this forum: Adam H, BipAnina, Bkppiw39, carpinteyroqbe, EncardinonnagPTH, Fekeenuisance, FiemiBrarkemi, HFLpqoal, lknccgeq, Madurist, Rarkammiscare, rath358, riskUnegreePTH, SlefBalia, Tebychacy, Tooftetaidive and 13 guests