Moderators: Moderators General, Magistrates, Prelates
If you've never been pregnant, your uterus is a bit less flexible, and therefore somewhat more likely to be perforated during the insertion of an IUD. So "nulliparious" women have had trouble getting IUDs in the past, and it makes sense to go to an OBGYN who does a lot of IUD insertions and therefore knows what they are doing. However, I've never heard anything bad about IUDs and virgins, in particular. I think sophyturtle is completely correct. Also, I'm pretty sure that one of the regular posters on this thread got an IUD as a virgin: if I remember correctly, it wasn't the most pleasant experience in her life, but she's really happy with the results.eaglewings51 wrote:I've heard that a lot of doctors won't fit you for an IUD if you're a virgin and if they do, it tends to be very painful and difficult if not impossible. Does anyone know if there's truth to that?
Amie wrote:Cathy, I now declare you to be an awesome person, by the powers vested in me by nobody, really.
yurell wrote:We need fewer homoeopaths, that way they'll be more potent!
The myth is more about having been pregnant before than being a virgin. And both are false. I was a virgin when I got my IUD (Mirena) and there were no issues. The gyno said it was a textbook insertion. Additionally, I am very small...the gyno did exclaim "holyshit you are tiny!!!" when she first looked. So uh...speaking as a tiny virgin haha, I had no issues.Enuja wrote:eaglewings51 wrote:I've heard that a lot of doctors won't fit you for an IUD if you're a virgin and if they do, it tends to be very painful and difficult if not impossible. Does anyone know if there's truth to that?
Sungura wrote:(and I've been told by some guys, ones that know of IUDs, they prefer IUD's because some girls lie about being on bc as they want to get pregnant but you can't lie about an iud! which...holyshit I never knew some lied about that!)
Amie wrote:Cathy, I now declare you to be an awesome person, by the powers vested in me by nobody, really.
yurell wrote:We need fewer homoeopaths, that way they'll be more potent!
Cathy wrote:You know, if you pm me your mailing address, I will send you yummies and something happy. <3 If you're not comfortable with that it's totally ok!
PAstrychef wrote:When the sex comments got really bad and the pictures of naked or scantily-clad women became really a bit much, I put up some shots of naked guys. A week later the shop got repainted and a no-pictures policy put in place.
une see wrote:Cass, YOU are my favorite!
http://www.stacommunications.com/journals/diagnosis/2008/05-May%202008/071-WH-May%2008.pdf wrote:A nonsterile bimanual exam determines size, position and uterocervical angulation. Under sterile conditions the cervix is then visualized with a sterile speculum. Because IUD insertion is painful and can cause syncope, the cervix should be frozen before the tenaculum is applied, a very simple procedure to perform. A 1 cc to 2 cc injection of 1% lidocaine is given through a long spinal needle to raise a superficialbleb at the 12 o’clock position on the anterior cervix. Having the patient cough as you inject prevents them from having pain from the injection and not seeing the syringe also helps. Alternatives include 5% lidocaine gel or 20% benzacaine spray (with extended nozzle) for five seconds.
The described technique is simple, low cost, requires no special equipment, and adds no more than 30-60 seconds to insertion time. Patients do not feel the injection of local anesthetic solution. The advantages of using a local anesthetic are as follows: 1) minimal discomfort felt during insertion; 2) postinsertion cramping is eliminated or greatly reduced; 3) elimination of cervical shock or vasovagal reaction during or just after insertion; 4) maximal patient cooperation allowing easier attainment of absolute no touch technique and ensuring correct placement of the device; 5) reduction in recovery and resting time following insertion; and 6) a positive influence on patient acceptance of the device due to pain-free insertion.
Sizing Info:
Small: Accommodates most women who wear 32A, 32B, or 34A.
Medium: Accommodates most women who wear 32C or 34B.
Large: Accommodates most women who wear 32D, 34C, or 36B.
une see wrote:Cass, YOU are my favorite!
Amie wrote:Cathy, I now declare you to be an awesome person, by the powers vested in me by nobody, really.
yurell wrote:We need fewer homoeopaths, that way they'll be more potent!
cephalopod9 wrote:oh dang, why stop at one pocket?
Utility Bra
mochafairy wrote:It's not the small sizes that bug me, it's that I'd like more sizes available, for women of every shape and size.
Amie wrote:Cathy, I now declare you to be an awesome person, by the powers vested in me by nobody, really.
yurell wrote:We need fewer homoeopaths, that way they'll be more potent!
mochafairy wrote:cephalopod9 wrote:oh dang, why stop at one pocket?
Utility Bra
I am...Batwoman!
broken_escalator wrote:Everyone knows afros are a hard counter to petrification.
poxic wrote:When we're stuck, flailing, and afraid, that's usually when we're running into the limitations of our old ways of doing things. Something new is being born. Stick around and find out what it is.
Users browsing this forum: Bakstoola, Bkppiw39, dyclectuale, Farpappestals, Fekeenuisance, feraeUrbataabith, GuetraGma, hflsslo, Ledeeffelioli, shealtket, Slageammalymn, SlefBalia, Tebychacy, Uttehythino and 6 guests