
Untitled by LadiesWhoKill, on Flickr
My sister has a lot of great photos so check her out!
This photo is the one she has to constantly bitch about because no one ever credits her for it:

baby skunk by LadiesWhoKill, on Flickr
Moderators: Jacque, Moderators General, Prelates




sillybear25 wrote:But it's NPH, so it's creepy in the best possible way.
Shivahn wrote:I'm in your abstractions, burning your notions of masculinity.







sillybear25 wrote:But it's NPH, so it's creepy in the best possible way.
Shivahn wrote:I'm in your abstractions, burning your notions of masculinity.
F117Landers wrote:HDR images always seem just a tad too off for me, but always interesting to look at.
Also, what's up with everyone referring to themselves as "HULK" within the past month or so?
sillybear25 wrote:But it's NPH, so it's creepy in the best possible way.
Shivahn wrote:I'm in your abstractions, burning your notions of masculinity.

That is exactly the combo I want to move to when I can afford it. Except that when I can afford that I'll be able to afford a 5D Mk I and I'll need even more expensive glass.Link wrote:Canon EOS 450D with EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM and EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM. Yes, it cost me a small fortune (considering I'm entirely an amateur), but it's a damn brilliant set.

Carnildo wrote:Cloudy with a chance of eclipse
MotorToad wrote:Reposting to post some of my efforts. I'm still using (the ever-increasingly infuriating) Picasa for hosting so they're a bit smaller than I'd like to post, but meh.
Many thanks. I agree, it's something I shouldn't need to know. When I first started using Picasa I really liked it, but google has featured it up to near uselessness. There was another pic I was going to share but it was too dark to see the object clearly (an osprey that was on my neighbor's old TV antenna and staring straight at me). So I edited it in picasa, got it to where I want it, but the photo on the web didn't change. Well, hell, go to edit it again and the edited version comes up in the editor. Nice. I can't find the edited version.adho wrote:These are really good shots!
Change the number after the s (i.e. 512, 720 etc.) to 0 in the address to get the original uploaded image. A trick you shouldn't have to use...
Sungura wrote:Care to comment on the settings used?
MotorToad wrote:I guess F/32 explains the fuzziness? I tried to get a couple of shots of the reflection (we had 90% coverage) but mostly I just took shots of the weird shadows. None of which looked like they got the effect like I wanted, still need to sort through them.







Sungura wrote:Excellent transit of Venus pictures

sillybear25 wrote:But it's NPH, so it's creepy in the best possible way.
Shivahn wrote:I'm in your abstractions, burning your notions of masculinity.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest