## Volume of the platonic diet

Apparently, people like to eat.

Moderators: SecondTalon, Moderators General, Prelates

Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:28 pm UTC
Location: Space Florida

### Volume of the platonic diet

So if the platonic person consumes 2000 Calories a day, what volume of food do they consume?

I know that there's a lot more flexibility in the volume of a person's diet than the Calorie intake, but there are still limits, even if they are further away.

For instance to get the DRI of protein , one would need to eat 2.632 Kg or 5.803 pounds of cauliflower. I have doubts that it's possible or wise for a typical person to consume such high volumes of food.
The thing about recursion problems is that they tend to contain other recursion problems.

commodorejohn
Posts: 1158
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:21 pm UTC
Location: Placerville, CA
Contact:

### Re: Volume of the platonic diet

I dunno, but according to Kepler, the relative volumes of the five Platonic food groups are such that they can fit inside one another.
"'Legacy code' often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling."
- Bjarne Stroustrup
www.commodorejohn.com - in case you were wondering, which you probably weren't.

Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 3961
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

### Re: Volume of the platonic diet

If it was the Plutonic Diet, I think it would be roughly 4mg of 240Pu, but that would only give up half that energy after 6500 years, so you'd need almost 4.8 million separate (and time-displaced, for simplification purposes) packets of Pu, or 1.9kg of the stuff to output the 2000kcal daily, amd thus maybe 97cm³ by volume (not counting material for shielding, energy reclamation, etc, although separation wouldn't be critical, given that it isn't critical). But I've almost certainly miscalculated something.

Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:28 pm UTC
Location: Space Florida

### Re: Volume of the platonic diet

<sincere and actually not sarcastic>
Thank you for replying to my post with puns, even if you didn't provide any pertinent information about my query.
</sincere and actually not sarcastic>
The thing about recursion problems is that they tend to contain other recursion problems.

PAstrychef
for all intimate metaphysical encounters
Posts: 2997
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 6:24 pm UTC

### Re: Volume of the platonic diet

Since caloric density is so variable, your question is essentially unanswerable. Give me a list of foods and I could could generate some data for you.
Don’t become a well-rounded person. Well rounded people are smooth and dull. Become a thoroughly spiky person. Grow spikes from every angle. Stick in their throats like a puffer fish.

Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 3961
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

### Re: Volume of the platonic diet

I tried to find out what we were even talking about, before contributing, but couldn't get beyond links I presumed were entire parodies of any 'real' Platonic Diet that someone might have coined... (The most official-looing "Main website" led only to Facebook pages where the "You must login or register..." stuff was totally in the way of any further drilling down, even for the assumed publicly published content.)

Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:28 pm UTC
Location: Space Florida

### Re: Volume of the platonic diet

PAstrychef wrote:Since caloric density is so variable...
I'm not asking about calories, I'm asking about volume. There are mechanical limits to the human digestive system and those don't go away because the food has the right number of calories. There are ranges of what a person can possibly, comfortably, or healthily eat.

Yes, those limits aren't usually an issue and as such they deserve less focus, but they still exist and I expect someone knows more than me.
Soupspoon wrote:I tried to find out what we were even talking about.... Platonic Diet
I never meant the phrase "platonic diet" to be a proper noun. I meant the diet of a hypothetical, idealized person that it is useful to compare a real person to.
The thing about recursion problems is that they tend to contain other recursion problems.

PAstrychef
for all intimate metaphysical encounters
Posts: 2997
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 6:24 pm UTC

### Re: Volume of the platonic diet

Google tells me that the empty volume of the human stomach is about one liter, and the fully expanded volume about four liters. Foods change volume once cooked, so how much you can eat will depend on several factors.
Don’t become a well-rounded person. Well rounded people are smooth and dull. Become a thoroughly spiky person. Grow spikes from every angle. Stick in their throats like a puffer fish.

Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 3961
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

### Re: Volume of the platonic diet

Soupspoon wrote:I tried to find out what we were even talking about.... Platonic Diet
I never meant the phrase "platonic diet" to be a proper noun. I meant the diet of a hypothetical, idealized person that it is useful to compare a real person to.

Then these guys (behind the Facebook popovers that dissuade me from trying to dig deeper anything) have confused matters.

Mikeski
Posts: 1069
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:24 am UTC
Location: Minnesota, USA

### Re: Volume of the platonic diet

PAstrychef wrote:Google tells me that the empty volume of the human stomach is about one liter, and the fully expanded volume about four liters.

I don't think anyone would eat more than three stomach-filling meals a day (although I have been on a cruise ship...), so a reasonable upper bound is 12 liters of food. (Hope you have enough t.p.)

And for a lower bound, lard is about 9000 calories/kg, and about 0.920 g/ml (or kg/l), so a 2000-calorie serving of the densest "food" I can think of is 0.24 liters.

So a range of a quarter-liter to twelve liters.

A Platonic ideal volume? I dunno, maybe a liter or two per day? Far too dependent on food choice. And the definition of volume. Is the "volume" of bread what it looks like sitting on a plate, or what you swallow after chewing all the air bubbles out of it?

Here's an article (annoying clickthru style, but only seven pages, and the seventh one isn't needed) that has pictures of "typical" diets for six people from around the world. (And the USAan truck driver has two packs of cigs on his tray, because 'murica, y'all.) The trays and tables of food look like about two liters to me, but they're also averaging over 3000 calories a day...

(I won't try "calories" for a high-end reading, since I've heard you can starve yourself to death by eating nothing but raw celery; it supposedly provides fewer calories than digesting it requires.)

Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:28 pm UTC
Location: Space Florida

### Re: Volume of the platonic diet

Soupsoon wrote:Then these guys
We don't want to be those guys.
PAstrychef wrote:Google tells me that the empty volume of the human stomach is about one liter, and the fully expanded volume about four liters.
Mikeski wrote:I don't think anyone would eat more than three stomach-filling meals a day (although I have been on a cruise ship...), so a reasonable upper bound is 12 liters of food. (Hope you have enough t.p.)
That's a good upper bound, but I also think in practice it might be lower since I don't think the stomach typically empties completely between meals.
And the definition of volume.
As I see it there're different volumes of interest depend on the stage of digestion stage of digestion.

pre-stomach: Air removed. Since most food is mostly water this can be approximated by taking the mass and multiplying by 1 mL/g

post-stomach: Loose water removed. For example a hearty soup and raw celery both might be 95% water, but the stomach can absorb most of the water from the soup, so the same pre-stomach volume of both would mean a proportionately higher post-stomach volume.

pre-colon: A lot more complicated, since so much has already been removed and added.
I won't try "calories" for a high-end reading, since I've heard you can starve yourself to death by eating nothing but raw celery; it supposedly provides fewer calories than digesting it requires.
That's false in that it provides more net calories than nothing.

However, 2000 Calories requires 12.5 kg of raw celery, so I do think a typical person locked in a room with infinite celery would get pretty hungry.
The thing about recursion problems is that they tend to contain other recursion problems.

PAstrychef
for all intimate metaphysical encounters
Posts: 2997
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 6:24 pm UTC

### Re: Volume of the platonic diet

Quizatzhaderac wrote:That's false in that it provides more net calories than nothing.

However, 2000 Calories requires 12.5 kg of raw celery, so I do think a typical person locked in a room with infinite celery would get pretty hungry.

That, in a celery stalk, is the panda's problem. Limited diet with low nutritional density.
Don’t become a well-rounded person. Well rounded people are smooth and dull. Become a thoroughly spiky person. Grow spikes from every angle. Stick in their throats like a puffer fish.

Liri
Healthy non-floating pooper reporting for doodie.
Posts: 1113
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 8:11 pm UTC
Contact:

### Re: Volume of the platonic diet

Low-nutrition diets lend one to being an idiot, like koalas.
There's a certain amount of freedom involved in cycling: you're self-propelled and decide exactly where to go. If you see something that catches your eye to the left, you can veer off there, which isn't so easy in a car, and you can't cover as much ground walking.